The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human ovarian reserve from conception to the menopause
Open accessAbstract
Current understanding is that the human ovary contains a fixed number of several million non-growing follicles (NGF), established by five months of gestational age, that declines with increasing age to the menopause when approximately 1,000 NGF remain at an average age of 50-51 years. With approximately 450 ovulatory monthly cycles in the normal human reproductive lifespan, this progressive decline in NGF numbers is attributed to follicle death by apoptosis. Individual histological studies have quantified NGF numbers over limited age ranges. However, no model describing the rate of establishment and decline of the NGF population from conception to menopause has been previously reported. Here we describe the best fitting model of the age-related NGF population in the human ovary from conception to menopause. Our model matches the log-adjusted NGF population to a five-parameter asymmetric double Gaussian cumulative (ADC) curve (r2 = 0.81). Furthermore we found that the rate of NGF recruitment into growing follicles for all women increases from birth until approximately age 14 years (coinciding with puberty) then decreases towards the menopause. The explanation for this new finding remains unclear but is likely to involve both paracrine and endocrine factors. We describe and analyse the best fitting model for the establishment and decline of human NGF; our model extends our current understanding of human ovarian reserve.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parent, A.-S., Teilmann, G., Juul, A., Skakkebaek, N. E., Toppari, J., & Bourguignon, J.-P. (2003) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2002-0019 · Cited by 1,762
Cited by
Anti-müllerian hormone and ovarian reserve: Update on assessing ovarian function
Moolhuijsen, L. M. E., & Visser, J. A. (2020) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaa513 · Cited by 584
Monniaux, D., Clément, F., Dalbiès-Tran, R., Estienne, A., Fabre, S., Mansanet, C., & Monget, P. (2014) · Biology of Reproduction · doi:10.1095/biolreprod.113.117077 · Cited by 233
Mitochondrial and sex steroid hormone crosstalk during aging
Velarde, M. C. (2014) · Longevity & Healthspan · doi:10.1186/2046-2395-3-2 · Cited by 96
Mamsen, L. S., Charkiewicz, K., Anderson, R. A., Telfer, E. E., McLaughlin, M., Kelsey, T. W., Kristensen, S. G., Gook, D. A., Ernst, E., & Andersen, C. Y. (2019) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.02.003 · Cited by 86
Self-citationPrenatal Exposure to Endocrine Disruptors: A Developmental Etiology for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Hewlett, M., Chow, E., Aschengrau, A., & Mahalingaiah, S. (2017) · Reproductive Sciences · doi:10.1177/1933719116654992 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Wallace, W., & Kelsey, T.
- Venue
- Nature Precedings
- Published
- 2009-04-27
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e8772-e8772
- ISSN
- 1756-0357 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020445250
- Cited by
- 878
- References
- 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human ovarian reserve from conception to the menopause. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/npre.2009.3179.1
- The paper
- Wallace, W., & Kelsey, T. (2009). Human ovarian reserve from conception to the menopause. Nature Precedings. https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2009.3179.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.