The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CO2 Enhancement of Forest Productivity Constrained by Limited Nitrogen Availability
Open accessAbstract
Stimulation of terrestrial productivity by rising CO~2~ concentration is projected to reduce the airborne fraction of anthropogenic CO~2~ emissions; coupled climate-carbon (C) cycle models, including those used in the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4), are sensitive to this negative feedback on atmospheric CO~2~^1^. The representation of the so-called CO~2~ fertilization effect in the 11 models used in AR4 and subsequent models^2,3^ was broadly consistent with experimental evidence from four free-air CO~2~ enrichment (FACE) experiments, which indicated that net primary productivity (NPP) of forests was increased by 23 +/- 2% in response to atmospheric CO~2~ enrichment to 550 ppm^4^. Substantial uncertainty remains, however, because of the expectation that feedbacks through the nitrogen (N) cycle will reduce the CO~2~ stimulation of NPP^5,6^; these feedbacks were not included in the AR4 models and heretofore have not been confirmed by experiments in forests^7^. Here, we provide new evidence from a FACE experiment in a deciduous Liquidambar styraciflua (sweetgum) forest stand in Tennessee, USA, that N limitation has significantly reduced the stimulation of NPP by elevated atmospheric CO~2~ concentration (eCO~2~). Isotopic evidence and N budget analysis support the premise that N availability in this forest ecosystem has been declining over time, and declining faster in eCO~2~. Model analyses and evidence from leaf- and stand-level observations provide mechanistic evidence that declining N availability constrained the tree response to eCO2. These results provide a strong rationale and process understanding for incorporating N limitation and N feedback effects in ecosystem and global models used in climate change assessments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climate–Carbon Cycle Feedback Analysis: Results from the C4MIP Model Intercomparison
Friedlingstein, P., Cox, P., Betts, R., Bopp, L., von Bloh, W., Brovkin, V., Cadule, P., Doney, S., Eby, M., Fung, I., et al. (2006) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli3800.1 · Cited by 2,902
Cited by
Weiskopf, S. R., Rubenstein, M. A., Crozier, L. G., Gaichas, S., Griffis, R., Halofsky, J. E., Hyde, K. J. W., Morelli, T. L., Morisette, J. T., Muñoz, R. C., et al. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137782 · Cited by 1,262
Buildings as a global carbon sink
Churkina, G., Organschi, A., Reyer, C. P. O., Ruff, A., Vinke, K., Liu, Z., Reck, B. K., Graedel, T. E., & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2020) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0462-4 · Cited by 1,045
Nobre, C. A., Sampaio, G., Borma, L. S., Castilla-Rubio, J. C., Silva, J. S., & Cardoso, M. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1605516113 · Cited by 1,045
Detection and attribution of vegetation greening trend in China over the last 30 years
Piao, S., Yin, G., Tan, J., Cheng, L., Huang, M., Li, Y., Liu, R., Mao, J., Myneni, R. B., Peng, S., et al. (2015) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12795 · Cited by 874
Phillips, R. P., Finzi, A. C., & Bernhardt, E. S. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01570.x · Cited by 788
Metadata
- Authors
- Norby, R., Warren, J., Iversen, C., Garten, C., Medlyn, B., & McMurtrie, R.
- Venue
- Nature Precedings
- Published
- 2009-09-14
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 45
- Pages
- 19368-19373
- ISSN
- 1756-0357 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2117806334
- Cited by
- 976
- References
- 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CO2 Enhancement of Forest Productivity Constrained by Limited Nitrogen Availability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/npre.2009.3747.1
- The paper
- Norby, R., Warren, J., Iversen, C., Garten, C., Medlyn, B., & McMurtrie, R. (2009). CO2 Enhancement of Forest Productivity Constrained by Limited Nitrogen Availability. Nature Precedings. https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2009.3747.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.