The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection of in vivo protein–DNA interactions using DamID in mammalian cells
Open accessAbstract
Understanding gene regulatory networks in mammalian cells requires detailed knowledge of protein–DNA interactions. Commonly used methods for genome-wide mapping of these interactions are based on chromatin immunoprecipitation. However, these methods have some drawbacks, such as the use of crosslinking reagents, the need for highly specific antibodies and relatively large amounts of starting material. We present DamID, an alternative technique to map genome-wide occupancy of interaction sites in vivo, that bypasses these limitations. DamID is based on the expression of a fusion protein consisting of a protein of interest and DNA adenine methyltransferase (Dam). This leads to methylation of adenines near sites where the protein of interest interacts with the DNA. These methylated sequences are subsequently amplified by a methylation-specific PCR protocol and identified by hybridization to microarrays. Using DamID, genome-wide maps of the binding of DNA-interacting proteins in mammalian cells can be constructed efficiently. Depending on the strategy used for expression of the Dam-fusion proteins, genome-wide binding maps can be obtained in as little as 2 weeks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Smyth, G. K. (2004) · Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.2202/1544-6115.1027 · Cited by 11,829
Huber, W., von Heydebreck, A., Sültmann, H., Poustka, A., & Vingron, M. (2002) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_1.s96 · Cited by 2,440
A Global Map of p53 Transcription-Factor Binding Sites in the Human Genome
Wei, C.-L., Wu, Q., Vega, V. B., Chiu, K. P., Ng, P., Zhang, T., Shahab, A., Yong, H. C., Fu, Y., Weng, Z., et al. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.043 · Cited by 1,141
Cited by
Molecular Maps of the Reorganization of Genome-Nuclear Lamina Interactions during Differentiation
Peric-Hupkes, D., Meuleman, W., Pagie, L., Bruggeman, S. W. M., Solovei, I., Brugman, W., Gräf, S., Flicek, P., Kerkhoven, R. M., van Lohuizen, M., et al. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.03.016 · Cited by 1,050
Self-citationthe 4D Nucleome Network, Dekker, J., Belmont, A. S., Guttman, M., Leshyk, V. O., Lis, J. T., Lomvardas, S., Mirny, L. A., O’Shea, C. C., Park, P. J., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23884 · Cited by 732
Insights from genomic profiling of transcription factors
Farnham, P. J. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2636 · Cited by 519
Position-Effect Variegation, Heterochromatin Formation, and Gene Silencing in Drosophila
Elgin, S. C. R., & Reuter, G. (2013) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a017780 · Cited by 499
DNA Sequence-Dependent Compartmentalization and Silencing of Chromatin at the Nuclear Lamina
Zullo, J. M., Demarco, I. A., Piqué-Regi, R., Gaffney, D. J., Epstein, C. B., Spooner, C. J., Luperchio, T. R., Bernstein, B. E., Pritchard, J. K., Reddy, K. L., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.035 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Vogel, M. J., Peric-Hupkes, D., & van Steensel, B.
- Venue
- Nature Protocols
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1467-1478
- ISSN
- 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-2189
- OpenAlex
- W2076438782
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of in vivo protein–DNA interactions using DamID in mammalian cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nprot.2007.148
- The paper
- Vogel, M. J., Peric-Hupkes, D., & van Steensel, B. (2007). Detection of in vivo protein–DNA interactions using DamID in mammalian cells. Nature Protocols. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.148
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.