The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Baker, D. & Sali, A. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 294, 93–96 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
- Watson, J.D., Laskowski, R.A. & Thornton, J.M. Predicting protein function from sequence and structural data. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 15, 275–284 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
- Qian, B. et al. High-resolution structure prediction and the crystallographic phase problem. Nature 450, 259–264 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
- Rava, P. & Hussain, M.M. Acquisition of triacylglycerol transfer activity by microsomal triglyceride transfer protein during evolution. Biochemistry 46, 12263–12274 (2007). · DOI
- Park, H. et al. Discovery of novel alpha-glucosidase inhibitors based on the virtual screening with the homology-modeled protein structure. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 16, 284–292 (2008). · DOI
- Karplus, K., Barrett, C. & Hughey, R. Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics 14, 846–856 (1998). · DOI · Paper page
- Ohlson, T., Wallner, B. & Elofsson, A. Profile–profile methods provide improved fold-recognition: a study of different profile–profile alignment methods. Proteins 57, 188–197 (2004). · DOI
- Bennett-Lovsey, R.M., Herbert, A.D., Sternberg, M.J.E. & Kelley, L.A. Exploring the extremes of sequence/structure space with ensemble fold recognition in the program Phyre. Proteins 70, 611–625 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
- Murzin, A.G., Brenner, S.E., Hubbard, T. & Chothia, C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247, 536–540 (1995).
- Berman, H.M. et al. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235–242 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
- McGuffin, L.J., Bryson, K. & Jones, D.T. The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 16, 404–405 (2000). · DOI
- Pollastri, G., Przybylski, D., Rost, B. & Baldi, P. Improving the prediction of protein secondary structure in three and eight classes using recurrent neural networks and profiles. Proteins 47, 228–235 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
- Cole, C., Barber, J.D. & Barton, G.J. The Jpred 3 secondary structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 36 (Web server issue): W197–W201 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
- Ward, J.J., McGuffin, L.J., Bryson, K., Buxton, B.F. & Jones, D.T. The DISOPRED server for the prediction of protein disorder. Bioinformatics 20, 2138–2139 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
- Tress, M.L., Jones, D.T. & Valenica, A. Predicting reliable regions in protein alignments from sequence profiles. J. Mol. Biol. 330, 705–718 (2003). · DOI
- Marchler-Bauer, A. et al. CDD: a conserved domain database for interactive domain family analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 35 (Database issue): D237–D240 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
- Finn, R.D. et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 36 (Database issue): D281–D288 (2008).
- Wass, M.N. & Sternberg, M.J.E. ConFunc—functional annotation in the twilight zone. Bioinformatics 24, 798–806 (2008). · DOI
- Yao, H. et al. An accurate, sensitive, and scalable method to identify functional sites in protein structures. J. Mol. Biol. 326, 255–261 (2003). · DOI
- Kinoshita, K. & Nakamura, H. Identification of protein biochemical functions by similarity search using the molecular surface database eF-site. Protein Sci. 12, 1589–1595 (2003). · DOI
- Laskowski, R.A. et al. Protein clefts in molecular recognition and function. Prot. Sci. 5, 2438–2452 (1996).
- Liang, J., Edelsbrunner, H., Fu, P., Sudhakar, P.V. & Subramaniam, S. Analytical shape computation of macromolecules I and II. Proteins 33, 1–17 and 18–29 (1998). · DOI
- Jones, D.T. Predicting novel protein folds by using FRAGFOLD. Proteins 45 (Suppl. 5): 127–132 (2001). · DOI
- Kim, D.E., Chivian, D. & Baker, D. Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server. Nucleic Acids Res. 32 (Web server issue): W526–W531 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
- Zhang, Y. Template-based modeling and free modeling by I-TASSER in CASP7. Proteins 69 (Suppl. 8): 108–117 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
- Hulo, N. et al. The 20 years of PROSITE. Nucleic Acids Res. 36 (Database issue): D245–D249 (2008).
Cited by
The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis
Kelley, L. A., Mezulis, S., Yates, C. M., Wass, M. N., & Sternberg, M. J. E. (2015) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2015.053 · Cited by 9,652
Self-citationInsights into RNA Biology from an Atlas of Mammalian mRNA-Binding Proteins
Castello, A., Fischer, B., Eichelbaum, K., Horos, R., Beckmann, B. M., Strein, C., Davey, N. E., Humphreys, D. T., Preiss, T., Steinmetz, L. M., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.031 · Cited by 2,132
Complex archaea that bridge the gap between prokaryotes and eukaryotes
Spang, A., Saw, J. H., Jørgensen, S. L., Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka, K., Martijn, J., Lind, A. E., van Eijk, R., Schleper, C., Guy, L., & Ettema, T. J. G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14447 · Cited by 1,324
Unusual biology across a group comprising more than 15% of domain Bacteria
Brown, C. T., Hug, L. A., Thomas, B. C., Sharon, I., Castelle, C. J., Singh, A., Wilkins, M. J., Wrighton, K. C., Williams, K. H., & Banfield, J. F. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14486 · Cited by 1,216
A Highly Conserved Program of Neuronal Microexons Is Misregulated in Autistic Brains
Irimia, M., Weatheritt, R. J., Ellis, J. D., Parikshak, N. N., Gonatopoulos-Pournatzis, T., Babor, M., Quesnel-Vallières, M., Tapial, J., Raj, B., O’Hanlon, D., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.035 · Cited by 693
“Next, we modeled the structure of microexon-containing Ensembl proteins using the Phyre fold-recognition server (Kelley and Sternberg, 2009), with default parameters.”
MethodSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kelley, L. A., & Sternberg, M. J. E.
- Venue
- Nature Protocols
- Published
- 2009-02-26
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 363-371
- ISSN
- 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-2189
- OpenAlex
- W2060259273
- Cited by
- 4,175
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 113.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.