Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4,175

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server

Kelley, Lawrence A, Sternberg, Michael J E·2009·Nature Protocols
DOI 10.1038/nprot.2009.2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nprot.2009.2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Baker, D. & Sali, A. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 294, 93–96 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Watson, J.D., Laskowski, R.A. & Thornton, J.M. Predicting protein function from sequence and structural data. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 15, 275–284 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Qian, B. et al. High-resolution structure prediction and the crystallographic phase problem. Nature 450, 259–264 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Rava, P. & Hussain, M.M. Acquisition of triacylglycerol transfer activity by microsomal triglyceride transfer protein during evolution. Biochemistry 46, 12263–12274 (2007). · DOI
  5. Park, H. et al. Discovery of novel alpha-glucosidase inhibitors based on the virtual screening with the homology-modeled protein structure. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 16, 284–292 (2008). · DOI
  6. Karplus, K., Barrett, C. & Hughey, R. Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics 14, 846–856 (1998). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Ohlson, T., Wallner, B. & Elofsson, A. Profile–profile methods provide improved fold-recognition: a study of different profile–profile alignment methods. Proteins 57, 188–197 (2004). · DOI
  8. Bennett-Lovsey, R.M., Herbert, A.D., Sternberg, M.J.E. & Kelley, L.A. Exploring the extremes of sequence/structure space with ensemble fold recognition in the program Phyre. Proteins 70, 611–625 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Murzin, A.G., Brenner, S.E., Hubbard, T. & Chothia, C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247, 536–540 (1995).
  10. Berman, H.M. et al. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235–242 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  11. McGuffin, L.J., Bryson, K. & Jones, D.T. The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 16, 404–405 (2000). · DOI
  12. Pollastri, G., Przybylski, D., Rost, B. & Baldi, P. Improving the prediction of protein secondary structure in three and eight classes using recurrent neural networks and profiles. Proteins 47, 228–235 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Cole, C., Barber, J.D. & Barton, G.J. The Jpred 3 secondary structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 36 (Web server issue): W197–W201 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Ward, J.J., McGuffin, L.J., Bryson, K., Buxton, B.F. & Jones, D.T. The DISOPRED server for the prediction of protein disorder. Bioinformatics 20, 2138–2139 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Tress, M.L., Jones, D.T. & Valenica, A. Predicting reliable regions in protein alignments from sequence profiles. J. Mol. Biol. 330, 705–718 (2003). · DOI
  16. Marchler-Bauer, A. et al. CDD: a conserved domain database for interactive domain family analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 35 (Database issue): D237–D240 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  17. Finn, R.D. et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 36 (Database issue): D281–D288 (2008).
  18. Wass, M.N. & Sternberg, M.J.E. ConFunc—functional annotation in the twilight zone. Bioinformatics 24, 798–806 (2008). · DOI
  19. Yao, H. et al. An accurate, sensitive, and scalable method to identify functional sites in protein structures. J. Mol. Biol. 326, 255–261 (2003). · DOI
  20. Kinoshita, K. & Nakamura, H. Identification of protein biochemical functions by similarity search using the molecular surface database eF-site. Protein Sci. 12, 1589–1595 (2003). · DOI
  21. Laskowski, R.A. et al. Protein clefts in molecular recognition and function. Prot. Sci. 5, 2438–2452 (1996).
  22. Liang, J., Edelsbrunner, H., Fu, P., Sudhakar, P.V. & Subramaniam, S. Analytical shape computation of macromolecules I and II. Proteins 33, 1–17 and 18–29 (1998). · DOI
  23. Jones, D.T. Predicting novel protein folds by using FRAGFOLD. Proteins 45 (Suppl. 5): 127–132 (2001). · DOI
  24. Kim, D.E., Chivian, D. & Baker, D. Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server. Nucleic Acids Res. 32 (Web server issue): W526–W531 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  25. Zhang, Y. Template-based modeling and free modeling by I-TASSER in CASP7. Proteins 69 (Suppl. 8): 108–117 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  26. Hulo, N. et al. The 20 years of PROSITE. Nucleic Acids Res. 36 (Database issue): D245–D249 (2008).

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kelley, L. A., & Sternberg, M. J. E.
Venue
Nature Protocols
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2009-02-26
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
363-371
ISSN
  • 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2189
DOI
10.1038/nprot.2009.2
OpenAlex
W2060259273
Cited by
4,175
References
1
FWCI
113.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.