Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 338

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Production of hepatocyte-like cells from human pluripotent stem cells

Open access
Hannan, Nicholas R F, Segeritz, Charis-Patricia, Touboul, Thomas, Vallier, Ludovic·2013·Nature Protocols

Abstract

Large-scale production of hepatocytes from a variety of genetic backgrounds would be beneficial for drug screening and to provide a source of cells to be used as a substitute for liver transplantation. However, fully functional primary hepatocytes remain difficult to expand in vitro, and circumventing this problem by using an alternative source of cells is desirable. Here we describe a 25-d protocol to direct the differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into a near-homogenous population of hepatocyte-like cells. As cells progress through this protocol, they express genes in a chronological manner similar to that described during in vivo hepatic development. The protocol relies on culture systems devoid of serum, feeders or complex extracellular matrices, which enable molecular analyses without interference from unknown factors. This approach works efficiently with human embryonic stem cells and human induced pluripotent stem cells and was recently used to model liver diseases in vitro.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nprot.2012.153

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 338

Metadata

Authors
Hannan, N. R. F., Segeritz, C.-P., Touboul, T., & Vallier, L.
Venue
Nature Protocols
Published
2013-01-31
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
430-437
ISSN
  • 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2189
OpenAlex
W1993623398
Cited by
338
References
17
FWCI
11.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.