CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 209

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genome-wide analysis of replication timing by next-generation sequencing with E/L Repli-seq

Marchal, Claire, Sasaki, Takayo, Vera, Daniel, Wilson, Korey, Sima, Jiao, Rivera-Mulia, Juan Carlos, Trevilla-García, Claudia, Nogues, Coralin, Nafie, Ebtesam, Gilbert, David M·2018·Nature Protocols
DOI 10.1038/nprot.2017.148PMC PMC6044726

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nprot.2017.148

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Weber, T.S., Jaehnert, I., Schichor, C., Or-Guil, M. & Carneiro, J. Quantifying the length and variance of the eukaryotic cell cycle phases by a stochastic model and dual nucleoside pulse labelling. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003616 (2014). · DOI
  2. Hiratani, I. et al. Global reorganization of replication domains during embryonic stem cell differentiation. PLoS Biol. 6, e245 (2008). · DOI
  3. Hiratani, I. et al. Genome-wide dynamics of replication timing revealed by in vitro models of mouse embryogenesis. Genome Res. 20, 155–169 (2010). · DOI
  4. Hansen, R.S. et al. Sequencing newly replicated DNA reveals widespread plasticity in human replication timing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 139–144 (2010). · DOI
  5. Pope, B.D., Hiratani, I. & Gilbert, D.M. Domain-wide regulation of DNA replication timing during mammalian development. Chromosome Res. 18, 127–136 (2010). · DOI
  6. Ryba, T. et al. Evolutionarily conserved replication timing profiles predict long-range chromatin interactions and distinguish closely related cell types. Genome Res. 20, 761–770 (2010). · DOI
  7. Ryba, T. et al. Replication timing: a fingerprint for cell identity and pluripotency. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002225 (2011). · DOI
  8. Rivera-Mulia, J.C. et al. Dynamic changes in replication timing and gene expression during lineage specification of human pluripotent stem cells. Genome Res. 25, 1091–1103 (2015). · DOI
  9. Sima, J. & Gilbert, D.M. Complex correlations: replication timing and mutational landscapes during cancer and genome evolution. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 25, 93–100 (2014). · DOI
  10. Renard-Guillet, C., Kanoh, Y., Shirahige, K. & Masai, H. Temporal and spatial regulation of eukaryotic DNA replication: from regulated initiation to genome-scale timing program. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 30, 110–120 (2014). · DOI
  11. Koren, A. DNA replication timing: coordinating genome stability with genome regulation on the X chromosome and beyond. Bioessays 36, 997–1004 (2014). · DOI
  12. Sequeira-Mendes, J. & Gutierrez, C. Links between genome replication and chromatin landscapes. Plant J. 83, 38–51 (2015). · DOI
  13. Boulos, R.E., Drillon, G., Argoul, F., Arneodo, A. & Audit, B. Structural organization of human replication timing domains. FEBS Lett. 589, 2944–2957 (2015). · DOI
  14. Dileep, V., Rivera-Mulia, J.C., Sima, J. & Gilbert, D.M. Large-scale chromatin structure–function relationships during the cell cycle and development: insights from replication timing. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 80, 53–63 (2015). · DOI
  15. Rivera-Mulia, J.C. & Gilbert, D.M. Replication timing and transcriptional control: beyond cause and effect — part III. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 40, 168–178 (2016). · DOI
  16. Gilbert, D.M. Temporal order of replication of Xenopus laevis 5S ribosomal RNA genes in somatic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 2924–2928 (1986). · DOI
  17. Gilbert, D.M. & Cohen, S.N. Bovine papilloma virus plasmids replicate randomly in mouse fibroblasts throughout S phase of the cell cycle. Cell 50, 59–68 (1987). · DOI
  18. Ryba, T., Battaglia, D., Pope, B.D., Hiratani, I. & Gilbert, D.M. Genome-scale analysis of replication timing: from bench to bioinformatics. Nat. Protoc. 6, 870–895 (2011). · DOI
  19. Wilson, K.A., Elefanty, A.G., Stanley, E.G. & Gilbert, D.M. Spatio-temporal re-organization of replication foci accompanies replication domain consolidation during human pluripotent stem cell lineage specification. Cell Cycle 15, 2464–2475 (2016). · DOI
  20. Sasaki, T. et al. Stability of patient-specific features of altered DNA replication timing in xenografts of primary human acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Exp. Hematol. 51, 71–82.e3. · DOI
  21. Koren, A. et al. Genetic variation in human DNA replication timing. Cell 159, 1015–1026 (2014). · DOI
  22. Mukhopadhyay, R. et al. Allele-specific genome-wide profiling in human primary erythroblasts reveal replication program organization. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004319 (2014). · DOI
  23. Bartholdy, B., Mukhopadhyay, R., Lajugie, J., Aladjem, M.I. & Bouhassira, E.E. Allele-specific analysis of DNA replication origins in mammalian cells. Nat. Commun. 6, 7051 (2015). · DOI
  24. Akhtar, W. et al. Chromatin position effects assayed by thousands of reporters integrated in parallel. Cell 154, 914–927 (2013). · DOI
  25. Pope, B.D. et al. Topologically-associating domains are stable units of replication-timing regulation. Nature 515, 402–405 (2014). · DOI
  26. Ryba, T. et al. Abnormal developmental control of replication-timing domains in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Genome Res. 22, 1833–1844 (2012). · DOI
  27. Rivera-Mulia, J.C. et al. Allele-specific control of replication timing and genome organization during development. Preprint at. bioRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/221762 (2017). · DOI
  28. Hansen, R.S., Canfield, T.K., Lamb, M.M., Gartler, S.M. & Laird, C.D. Association of fragile X syndrome with delayed replication of the FMR1 gene. Cell 73, 1403–1409 (1993). · DOI
  29. Gilbert, D.M. Evaluating genome-scale approaches to eukaryotic DNA replication. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 673–684 (2010). · DOI
  30. Koren, A. & McCarroll, S.A. Random replication of the inactive X chromosome. Genome Res. 24, 64–69 (2014). · DOI
  31. Dileep, V. & Gilbert, D.M. Single-cell replication profiling reveals stochastic regulation of the mammalian replication-timing program. Nat. Commun., (in the press).
  32. Dileep, V., Didier, R. & Gilbert, D.M. Genome-wide analysis of replication timing in mammalian cells: troubleshooting problems encountered when comparing different cell types. Methods 57, 165–169 (2012). · DOI
  33. Rivera-Mulia, J.C. & Gilbert, D.M. Replicating large genomes: divide and conquer. Mol. Cell 62, 756–765 (2016). · DOI
  34. Cornacchia, D. et al. Mouse Rif1 is a key regulator of the replication-timing programme in mammalian cells. EMBO J. 31, 3678–3690 (2012). · DOI
  35. Robinson, J.T. et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 24–26 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  36. Nicol, J.W., Helt, G.A., Blanchard, S.G., Raja, A. & Loraine, A.E. The Integrated Genome Browser: free software for distribution and exploration of genome-scale datasets. Bioinformatics 25, 2730–2731 (2009). · DOI
  37. Kent, W.J. et al. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 12, 996–1006 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  38. Weddington, N. et al. ReplicationDomain: a visualization tool and comparative database for genome-wide replication timing data. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 530 (2008). · DOI
  39. Rasmussen, T.P. et al. Messenger RNAs encoding mouse histone macroH2A1 isoforms are expressed at similar levels in male and female cells and result from alternative splicing. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 3685–3689 (1999). · DOI
  40. N2B27 Medium with LIF and 2i Inhibitors. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/pdb.rec096149 (2017). · DOI
  41. Bolstad, B.M., Irizarry, R.A., Åstrand, M. & Speed, T.P. A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics 19, 185–193 (2003). · DOI
  42. Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  43. Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  44. Quinlan, A.R. & Hall, I.M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  45. Lee, P.Y., Costumbrado, J., Hsu, C.-Y. & Kim, Y.H. Agarose gel electrophoresis for the separation of DNA fragments. J. Vis. Exp. 62, 3923 (2012).
  46. Yokochi, T. et al. G9a selectively represses a class of late-replicating genes at the nuclear periphery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 19363–19368 (2009). · DOI
  47. Takebayashi, S. et al. Murine esBAF chromatin remodeling complex subunits BAF250a and Brg1 are necessary to maintain and reprogram pluripotency-specific replication timing of select replication domains. Epigenetics Chromatin 6, 42 (2013). · DOI
  48. Pope, B.D. et al. DNA replication timing is maintained genome-wide in primary human myoblasts independent of D4Z4 contraction in FSH muscular dystrophy. PLoS ONE 6, e27413 (2011). · DOI
  49. Stamatoyannopoulos, J.A. et al. An encyclopedia of mouse DNA elements (mouse ENCODE). Genome Biol. 13, 418 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  50. Fernandez-Vidal, A. et al. A role for DNA polymerase θ in the timing of DNA replication. Nat. Commun. 5, 4285 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  51. Hadjadj, D. et al. Characterization of the replication timing program of 6 human model cell lines. Genomics Data 9, 113–117 (2016). · DOI
  52. Morishima, A., Grumbach, M.M. & Taylor, J.H. Asynchronous duplication of human chromosomes and the origin of sex chromatin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 48, 756–763 (1962). · DOI
  53. Takagi, N., Sugawara, O. & Sasaki, M. Regional and temporal changes in the pattern of X-chromosome replication during the early post-mplantation development of the female mouse. Chromosoma 85, 275–286 (1982). · DOI
  54. McKenna, A. et al. Whole-organism lineage tracing by combinatorial and cumulative genome editing. Science 353, aaf7907 (2016). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 209

Metadata

Authors
Marchal, C., Sasaki, T., Vera, D., Wilson, K., Sima, J., Rivera-Mulia, J. C., Trevilla-García, C., Nogues, C., Nafie, E., & Gilbert, D. M.
Venue
Nature Protocols
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-03-29
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
819-839
ISSN
  • 1754-2189
  • 1750-2799
DOI
10.1038/nprot.2017.148
PMC
PMC6044726
Cited by
209
References
3
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review