The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Data processing, multi-omic pathway mapping, and metabolite activity analysis using XCMS Online
Open accessAbstract
Systems biology is the study of complex living organisms, and as such, analysis on a systems-wide scale involves the collection of information-dense data sets that are representative of an entire phenotype. To uncover dynamic biological mechanisms, bioinformatics tools have become essential to facilitating data interpretation in large-scale analyses. Global metabolomics is one such method for performing systems biology, as metabolites represent the downstream functional products of ongoing biological processes. We have developed XCMS Online, a platform that enables online metabolomics data processing and interpretation. A systems biology workflow recently implemented within XCMS Online enables rapid metabolic pathway mapping using raw metabolomics data for investigating dysregulated metabolic processes. In addition, this platform supports integration of multi-omic (such as genomic and proteomic) data to garner further systems-wide mechanistic insight. Here, we provide an in-depth procedure showing how to effectively navigate and use the systems biology workflow within XCMS Online without a priori knowledge of the platform, including uploading liquid chromatography (LC)–mass spectrometry (MS) data from metabolite-extracted biological samples, defining the job parameters to identify features, correcting for retention time deviations, conducting statistical analysis of features between sample classes and performing predictive metabolic pathway analysis. Additional multi-omics data can be uploaded and overlaid with previously identified pathways to enhance systems-wide analysis of the observed dysregulations. We also describe unique visualization tools to assist in elucidation of statistically significant dysregulated metabolic pathways. Parameter input takes 5–10 min, depending on user experience; data processing typically takes 1–3 h, and data analysis takes ∼30 min.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome
Grabherr, M. G., Haas, B. J., Yassour, M., Levin, J. Z., Thompson, D. A., Amit, I., Adiconis, X., Fan, L., Raychowdhury, R., Zeng, Q., et al. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1883 · Cited by 21,039
Cox, J., & Mann, M. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1511 · Cited by 14,855
On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other
Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177730491 · Cited by 14,320
Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis
Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441 · Cited by 13,912
Statistical significance for genomewide studies
Storey, J. D., & Tibshirani, R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1530509100 · Cited by 9,692
Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer
The Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11252 · Cited by 8,499
Haas, B. J., Papanicolaou, A., Yassour, M., Grabherr, M., Blood, P. D., Bowden, J., Couger, M. B., Eccles, D., Li, B., Lieber, M., et al. (2013) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.084 · Cited by 8,464
The Reactome pathway Knowledgebase
Fabregat, A., Sidiropoulos, K., Garapati, P., Gillespie, M., Hausmann, K., Haw, R., Jassal, B., Jupe, S., Korninger, F., McKay, S., et al. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1351 · Cited by 5,605
Smith, C. A., Want, E. J., O'Maille, G., Abagyan, R., & Siuzdak, G. (2006) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac051437y · Cited by 5,262
Self-citationUniProt: a hub for protein information
The UniProt Consortium (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku989 · Cited by 5,106
Cited by
Integrated omics: tools, advances and future approaches
Misra, B. B., Langefeld, C., Olivier, M., & Cox, L. A. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/jme-18-0055 · Cited by 686
Machine learning and integrative analysis of biomedical big data
Mirza, B., Wang, W., Wang, J., Choi, H., Chung, N. C., & Ping, P. (2019) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes10020087 · Cited by 380
Chen, S., Zhu, P., Mao, L., Wu, W., Lin, H., Xu, D., Lu, X., & Shi, J. (2023) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202208256 · Cited by 363
Metabolomics: A Way Forward for Crop Improvement
Razzaq, A., Sadia, B., Raza, A., Khalid Hameed, M., & Saleem, F. (2019) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo9120303 · Cited by 253
The need for an integrated multi-OMICs approach in microbiome science in the food system
Ferrocino, I., Rantsiou, K., McClure, R., Kostic, T., de Souza, R. S. C., Lange, L., FitzGerald, J., Kriaa, A., Cotter, P., Maguin, E., et al. (2023) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.13103 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Forsberg, E. M., Huan, T., Rinehart, D., Benton, H. P., Warth, B., Hilmers, B., & Siuzdak, G.
- Venue
- Nature Protocols
- Published
- 2018-03-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 633-651
- ISSN
- 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-2189
- OpenAlex
- W2794334542
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 11.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Data processing, multi-omic pathway mapping, and metabolite activity analysis using XCMS Online. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nprot.2017.151
- The paper
- Forsberg, E. M., Huan, T., Rinehart, D., Benton, H. P., Warth, B., Hilmers, B., & Siuzdak, G. (2018). Data processing, multi-omic pathway mapping, and metabolite activity analysis using XCMS Online. Nature Protocols. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2017.151
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.