Cited by 8,464Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis

Open access
Haas, Brian J, Papanicolaou, Alexie, Yassour, Moran, Grabherr, Manfred, Blood, Philip D, Bowden, Joshua, Couger, Matthew Brian, Eccles, David +15 more·2013·Nature Protocols

Abstract

De novo assembly of RNA-seq data enables researchers to study transcriptomes without the need for a genome sequence; this approach can be usefully applied, for instance, in research on 'non-model organisms' of ecological and evolutionary importance, cancer samples or the microbiome. In this protocol we describe the use of the Trinity platform for de novo transcriptome assembly from RNA-seq data in non-model organisms. We also present Trinity-supported companion utilities for downstream applications, including RSEM for transcript abundance estimation, R/Bioconductor packages for identifying differentially expressed transcripts across samples and approaches to identify protein-coding genes. In the procedure, we provide a workflow for genome-independent transcriptome analysis leveraging the Trinity platform. The software, documentation and demonstrations are freely available from http://trinityrnaseq.sourceforge.net. The run time of this protocol is highly dependent on the size and complexity of data to be analyzed. The example data set analyzed in the procedure detailed herein can be processed in less than 5 h.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nprot.2013.084

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Paired-end strand-specific sequencing and long reads are preferred for de novo transcriptome assembly because they are more informative.

    “In general, PE strand-specific sequencing and long reads are preferred because they are more informative [33].”

    From A survey of best practices for RNA-seq data analysis (2016) · cites this paper as [33]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haas, B. J., Papanicolaou, A., Yassour, M., Grabherr, M., Blood, P. D., Bowden, J., Couger, M. B., Eccles, D., Li, B., Lieber, M., MacManes, M. D., Ott, M., Orvis, J., Pochet, N., Strozzi, F., Weeks, N., Westerman, R., William, T., Dewey, C. N., Henschel, R., LeDuc, R. D., Friedman, N., & Regev, A.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center (US)
  • Oklahoma State University (US)
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Center for Information Services and High Performance Computing (DE)
  • QB3 (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Parco Tecnologico Padano (IT)
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • GWT-TUD GmbH (Germany) (DE)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
  • Haas, Brian J
  • Regev, Aviv
Venue
Nature Protocols
Published
2013-07-11
Volume
8
Issue
8
Pages
1494-1512
ISSN
  • 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2189
OpenAlex
W2011657487
Cited by
8,464
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 483 · 2025: 626 · 2024: 709 · 2023: 754 · 2022: 858 · 2021: 1021 · 2020: 887 · 2019: 812 · 2018: 708 · 2017: 634 · 2016: 469 · 2015: 338 · 2014: 138 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 1
FWCI
142.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Protocols (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG005232, P50HG006193)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (HHSN272200900018C)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
de novo transcriptome assembly, Trinity, RNA-seq, non-model organisms, transcript abundance estimation, RSEM, differentially expressed transcripts
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, RNA, Schizosaccharomyces, Software, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Profiling, Schizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review