Cited by 1,943Metabolism, Diabetes, and CancerPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism

The LKB1-AMPK pathway: metabolism and growth control in tumour suppression

Open access
Shackelford, David B., Shaw, Reuben J.·2009·Nature Reviews Cancer

Abstract

In the past decade, studies of the human tumour suppressor LKB1 have uncovered a novel signalling pathway that links cell metabolism to growth control and cell polarity. LKB1 encodes a serine-threonine kinase that directly phosphorylates and activates AMPK, a central metabolic sensor. AMPK regulates lipid, cholesterol and glucose metabolism in specialized metabolic tissues, such as liver, muscle and adipose tissue. This function has made AMPK a key therapeutic target in patients with diabetes. The connection of AMPK with several tumour suppressors suggests that therapeutic manipulation of this pathway using established diabetes drugs warrants further investigation in patients with cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrc2676

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LKB1 plays a central role in energy homeostasis by sensing increased intracellular AMP/ATP ratio and phosphorylating AMPK, which in turn suppresses energy consumption by inhibiting mTOR and stimulating autophagy.

    “LKB1 plays a central role in energy homeostasis by sensing increased intracellular AMP/ATP ratio and phosphorylating AMPK, which in turn suppresses energy consumption by inhibiting mTOR and stimulating autophagy45.”

    From LKB1 regulates JNK-dependent stress signaling and apoptotic dependency of KRAS-mutant lung cancers (2025) · cites this paper as [45]

    In “LKB1 is a master kinase” (page unavailable), the paper says AMPK responds to falling ATP and rising AMP, while LKB1 phosphorylates AMPK during energy stress; it does not say LKB1 itself senses the AMP/ATP ratio. “A LKB1-AMPK-mTORC1 checkpoint” describes AMPK inhibiting mTORC1, and “Outstanding questions” reports that AMPK promotes autophagy under energy-poor conditions. The paper does not establish that autophagy suppresses energy consumption. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • All other signalling components for regulation of mTORC1 depending on energy deprivation sensing and amino acid sensing are present in the tardigrade.

    “In contrast, all other signalling components are present for regulation of mTORC1, depending on physiologic demands such as energy deprivation sensing29 and amino acid sensing30.”
  • LKB1 is a master kinase that regulates diverse cellular processes via phosphorylation of multiple members of AMPK family kinases.

    “LKB1 is a master kinase that regulates diverse cellular processes via phosphorylation of multiple members of AMPK family kinases45,65.”
  • Previous studies have revealed a complex, bidirectional interplay between the Hippo pathway and glucose metabolism.

    “previous studies have revealed complex, bidirectional interplay between the Hippo pathway and glucose metabolism (74).”
  • Animal experiments have elucidated the mechanisms underlying these epidemiological findings, i.e., interference with glucose, protein, and lipid metabolism of the neoplastic cells.

    “and interference with glucose(266), protein(267, 268), and lipid(269) metabolism of the neoplastic cells.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 201 · Cited by 1,943

Authors
Shackelford, D. B., & Shaw, R. J.
Affiliations
Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
Corresponding author
Shaw, Reuben J.
Venue
Nature Reviews Cancer
Published
2009-08
Volume
9
Issue
8
Pages
563-575
ISSN
  • 1474-175X (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1768
OpenAlex
W2044874695
Cited by
1,943
References
201
Citations by year
2026: 95 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 117 · 2023: 129 · 2022: 144 · 2021: 151 · 2020: 125 · 2019: 118 · 2018: 112 · 2017: 126 · 2016: 111 · 2015: 129 · 2014: 124 · 2013: 114 · 2012: 106
FWCI
6.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • American Cancer Society
  • V Foundation for Cancer Research
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (P01CA120964, T32CA009370)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK080425)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Keywords
LKB1, AMPK, tumor suppression, cellular metabolism, cell growth regulation, cell polarity, serine/threonine kinase, kinase phosphorylation, glucose metabolism, lipid metabolism, cholesterol metabolism, diabetes drugs, cancer therapy
MeSH terms
AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases, Animals, Blood Glucose, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Neoplasms, Protein Kinases, Signal Transduction, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Mice, AMP-Activated Protein Kinases, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review