Cited by 1,083Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 181 of the 181 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rational, biologically based treatment of EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer

Open access
Pao, William, Chmielecki, Juliann·2010·Nature Reviews Cancer

Abstract

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was first recognized in 2004 as a distinct, clinically relevant molecular subset of lung cancer. The disease has been the subject of intensive research at both the basic scientific and clinical levels, becoming a paradigm for how to understand and treat oncogene-driven carcinomas. Although patients with EGFR-mutant tumours have increased sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), primary and acquired resistance to these agents remains a major clinical problem. This Review summarizes recent developments aimed at treating and ultimately curing the disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrc2947

Cites

181 of 181 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 180 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Oh, I.-J. et al. in AACR–IASLC Joint Conference on Molecular Origins of Lung Cancer: Prospects for Personalized Prevention and Therapy (Coronado, California USA, 2010).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,083

Metadata

Authors
Pao, W., & Chmielecki, J.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Pao, William
Venue
Nature Reviews Cancer
Published
2010-10-22
Volume
10
Issue
11
Pages
760-774
ISSN
  • 1474-175X (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1768
OpenAlex
W2090029719
Cited by
1,083
References
180
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 90 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 93 · 2013: 93 · 2012: 104
FWCI
14.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Vanderbilt University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • National Cancer Institute (P30 CA 68485, R01CA121210, P01CA129243, CA90949, U54CA143798, P50CA090949, P30CA068485)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer, epidermal growth factor receptor, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, gefitinib, erlotinib, acquired drug resistance, primary resistance, targeted therapy
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Mutation, Protein-Tyrosine Kinases, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review