Structural, Biochemical, and Clinical Characterization of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Exon 20 Insertion Mutations in Lung Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Crystal structure and detailed analysis of different EGFR mutants explain why some mutations in exon 20 make lung cancers resistant to EGFR inhibitors and others make them more sensitive.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 75 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Among studied exon 20 insertions, only A763_Y764insFQEA was inhibited by erlotinib below 0.1 μM, along with control delL747_P753insS and L858R.
“only cells with EGFR-delL747_P753insS, L858R and the atypical A763_Y764insFQEA - among all EGFR exon 20 insertions - were inhibited by erlotinib concentrations below 0.1 µM (Fig. 1B, 1C and Sup. Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
D770_N771insNPG bound gefitinib with a Ki similar to WT EGFR (25.7 nM vs 16.4 nM).
“The D770_N771insNPG mutant bound gefitinib with a Ki similar to that of WT EGFR (Ki=25.7 nM for D770_N771insNPG and Ki=16.4 nM for WT EGFR).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Gefitinib and afatinib showed similar sensitivity patterns to erlotinib across the studied mutants.
“Nearly identical results were obtained with gefitinib (Sup. Table 2), and a similar pattern of insensitivity was noted with the more potent irreversible EGFR TKI afatinib (Sup. Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In cells with inhibitor-insensitive exon 20 insertions, phosphorylation of EGFR, AKT, and ERK was not fully inhibited by 1 μM erlotinib.
“phosphorylation of EGFR, AKT and ERK were not fully inhibited by 1 µM erlotinib in cells with the inhibitor-insensitive EGFR exon 20 insertions mutations (Fig. 1D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A767_V769dupASV lacked deactivation of phosphorylated EGFR, PI3K/AKT, MAPK/ERK, and upregulation of BIM with 1 μM or submicromolar erlotinib.
“an inhibitor-insensitive EGFR exon 20 insertion (A767_V769dupASV) lacked deactivation of phosphorylated EGFR, downstream targets (PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK) and upregulation of the apoptotic cascade, as measured by levels of BIM”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
A763_Y764insFQEA bound gefitinib about 10-fold more tightly than D770_N771insNPG.
“the inhibitor-sensitive A763_Y764insFQEA mutant bound gefitinib ∼10-fold more tightly than the insensitive D770_N771insNPG mutant (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The D770_N771insNPG structure superimposes well with the L858R structure in complex with the same inhibitor.
“overall the D770_N771insNPG structure superimposes well with the L858R structure in complex with the same inhibitor (Fig. 4B, 4C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Within the ATP site, the conformation of the covalently bound inhibitor is essentially the same as in the L858R structure.
“Within the ATP site, the conformation of the covalently bound inhibitor is essentially the same as in the L858R structure”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
BID007 DNA sequence confirmed the presence of the 12 nucleotides corresponding to A763_Y764insFQEA insertion.
“Sequence of exons 18–21 of EGFR from DNA isolated from BID007 confirmed the presence of the 12 nucleotides corresponding to the A763_Y764insFQEA insertion (Fig. 3A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is no evidence that the D770_N771insNPG mutation alters interactions with the inhibitor.
“there is no evidence that the D770_N771insNPG mutation alters interactions with the inhibitor (Fig. 4C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Tumors harboring these mutations did not achieve clinical or radiographic responses to usual doses of gefitinib (250 mg daily) or erlotinib (150 mg daily) in NSCLC patients.
“tumors harboring these mutations did not achieve clinical or radiographic responses to usual doses of gefitinib (250 mg daily) or erlotinib (150 mg daily) in NSCLC patients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
EGFR siRNAs had no effect on growth of KRAS-mutated A549 cells.
“As expected, EGFR siRNAs had no effect on the growth of KRAS mutated A549 cells (Fig. 3B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The D770_N771insNPG insertion lies at the C-terminal end of the C-helix immediately following D770.
“The D770_N771insNPG insertion lies at the C-terminal end of the C-helix, immediately following D770 (Fig. 4A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Three patients with A763_Y764insFQEA NSCLC achieved stable disease or partial response on erlotinib.
“three patients with A763_Y764insFQEA EGFR mutated NSCLCs either achieved stable disease (SD) or partial response (PR) when treated with erlotinib (Fig. 2A, 2B, Sup. Fig. 5, Sup. Table 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
These results were confirmed in BID007, a NSCLC-derived cell line bearing EGFR A763_Y764insFQEA.
“These results were also confirmed in BID007, a NSCLC-derived cell line bearing the EGFR A763_Y764insFQEA mutation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Growth of BID007, PC9, HCC827, and H3255 cells was inhibited by submicromolar concentrations of erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib.
“growth of BID007, PC9, HCC827 and H3255 cells was inhibited by submicromolar concentrations of erlotinib (Fig. 3C, Sup. Table 2), gefitinib and afatinib (Sup. Table 2), indicating augmented sensitivity relative to the inhibitor-resistant H1975 cell line.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The shift in register effectively replaces I759 with alanine.
“The shift in register in the C-helix effectively replaces I759 with alanine (Fig. 5D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Progression-free survival of patients with A763_Y764insFQEA exceeded that of patients with other exon 20 mutations.
“the progression-free survival of these patients exceed that of patients with other exon 20 mutations (Sup. Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No additional mutation was identified in 113 known oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in BID007.
“DNA was also analyzed for additional hotspot mutations in 113 known oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes (Sup. Table 4), and no additional mutation was identified.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The response rate to gefitinib or erlotinib was significantly higher for A763_Y764insFQEA (2/3; 66.6%) than for all other mutations within or following the C-helix (0/16, 0%; p=0.0175).
“the RR of gefitinib or erlotinib was significantly higher for A763_Y764insFQEA (2/3; 66.6%) when compared to all other mutations within or following the C-helix (0/16, 0%; p=0.0175)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
BID007 and H3255 underwent apoptosis with submicromolar erlotinib, as shown by PARP cleavage.
“and underwent apoptosis with submicromolar doses of erlotinib, as shown by PARP cleavage (Fig. 3E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The four-residue FQEA insertion occurs just C-terminal to A763 in the middle of the C-helix.
“The four residue FQEA insertion occurs just C-terminal to A763, in the middle of the C-helix.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Levels of phosphorylated EGFR, AKT, and ERK in BID007, PC9, HCC827, and H3255 were diminished by 1 μM erlotinib.
“The levels of phosphorylated EGFR, AKT and ERK in BID007, PC9, HCC827 and H3255 were diminished by 1 µM of erlotinib (Fig. 3D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Only BID007 and H3255 had deactivation of phosphorylated EGFR, AKT, ERK and upregulation of BIM with submicromolar erlotinib.
“only BID007 and H3255 had deactivation of phosphorylated EGFR, AKT, ERK and upregulation of BIM with submicromolar concentrations of erlotinib (Fig. 3E)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
BID007 showed broad and focal copy gains or losses across chromosomes.
“many regions of the cells’ chromosomes had broad and focal copy gains or losses (Sup. Fig. 9A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Beyond the inserted glycine, the polypeptide conformation is similar to WT and L858R kinases.
“Beyond this glycine, the conformation of the polypeptide chain is quite similar to that of the WT and L858R kinases 38”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Yun CH Boggon TJ Li Y Woo MS Greulich H Meyerson M Eck MJ Structures of lung cancer-derived EGFR mutants and inhibitor complexes: mechanism of activation and insights into differential inhibitor sensitivity Cancer Cell 2007 11 217 227 17349580 PMC1939942 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Three patients with NSCLCs harboring EGFR A763_Y764insFQEA had clinical and radiographic regressions or stable disease on erlotinib 150 mg daily.
“Three patients with NSCLCs harboring EGFR A763_Y764insFQEA had clinical and radiographic regressions or stable disease on erlotinib 150 mg daily.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Almost all 19 NSCLC patients with diverse exon 20 insertions from the centers displayed progressive disease on gefitinib or erlotinib.
“almost all 19 NSCLC patients from our centers displayed progressive disease (PD) in the course of treatment with gefitinib or erlotinib (Fig. 2B, Sup. Table 3, and Sup. Fig. 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The D770_N771insNPG structure contains five molecules in the asymmetric unit arranged in a continuous chain of asymmetric dimer interactions.
“The structure contains five molecules in the crystallographic asymmetric unit arranged in a continuous chain of “asymmetric dimer” interactions in which the C-lobe of one molecule interacts with the N-lobe of the next (Sup. Fig. 10A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cells bearing Y764_V765insHH, M766_A767insAI, A767_V769dupASV, D770_N771insNPG, D770_N771insSVD, and H773_V774insH are not inhibited by clinically achievable doses of gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib.
“We characterized Y764_V765insHH, M766_A767insAI, A767_V769dupASV, D770_N771insNPG, D770_N771insSVD and H773_V774insH using in vitro models and found that cells bearing these mutant EGFR proteins are not inhibited by clinically-achievable doses of gefitinib, erlotinib 12,35,52–54 or the irreversible EGFR inhibitor afatinib 35,55.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 6 sources checked- cites [12] Nguyen KS Kobayashi S Costa DB Acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancers dependent on the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway Clin. Lung Cancer 2009 10 281 289 19632948 PMC2758558 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [35] Yasuda H Kobayashi S Costa DB EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: preclinical data and clinical implications Lancet Oncol 2012 13 e23 e31 21764376 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [52] Costa DB Nguyen KS Cho BC Sequist LV Jackman DM Riely GJ Yeap BY Halmos B Kim JH Janne PA Huberman MS Pao W Tenen DG Kobayashi S Effects of erlotinib in EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancers with resistance to gefitinib Clin. Cancer Res 2008 14 7060 7067 18981003 PMC2596582 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [53] Baselga J Rischin D Ranson M Calvert H Raymond E Kieback DG Kaye SB Gianni L Harris A Bjork T Averbuch SD Feyereislova A Swaisland H Rojo F Albanell J Phase I safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic trial of ZD1839, a selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with five selected solid tumor types J Clin. Oncol 2002 20 4292 4302 12409327 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [54] Hidalgo M Siu LL Nemunaitis J Rizzo J Hammond LA Takimoto C Eckhardt SG Tolcher A Britten CD Denis L Ferrante K Von Hoff DD Silberman S Rowinsky EK Phase I and pharmacologic study of OSI-774, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid malignancies J Clin. Oncol 2001 19 3267 3279 11432895 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [55] Yap TA Vidal L Adam J Stephens P Spicer J Shaw H Ang J Temple G Bell S Shahidi M Uttenreuther-Fischer M Stopfer P Futreal A Calvert H de Bono JS Plummer R Phase I trial of the irreversible EGFR and HER2 kinase inhibitor BIBW 2992 in patients with advanced solid tumors J Clin Oncol 2010 28 3965 3972 20679611 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
BID007 cell line was derived from malignant pleural effusion of a patient with NSCLC containing EGFR A763_Y764insFQEA.
“we derived a lung cell line from the malignant pleural effusion of a patient with a NSCLC containing EGFR A763_Y764insFQEA (Fig. 3A; Sup. Table 3, and Sup. Fig. 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The structure of D770_N771insNPG shows that its three amino acid insertion forms a wedge at the end of the C-helix that may lock the helix in its inward, active position.
“The structure of D770_N771insNPG, which we studied as a representative EGFR TKI-insensitive exon 20 mutation, shows how the three amino acid insertion forms a “wedge” at the end of the C-helix that may effectively lock the helix in its inward, active position.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: D770_N771insNPG is a representative EGFR TKI-insensitive exon 20 insertion mutation.
- Findingreasoning
D770_N771insNPG does not sensitize to gefitinib and erlotinib inhibition.
“Rather, D770_N771insNPG simply does not sensitize to gefitinib and erlotinib inhibition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
There are no structural alterations proximate to the ATP binding cleft in D770_N771insNPG.
“By contrast, there are no structural alterations proximate to the ATP binding cleft in D770_N771insNPG.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
D770_N771insNPG binds EGFR TKIs with a binding mode and apparent affinity similar to that of WT EGFR.
“The D770_N771insNPG structure, together with our enzyme kinetic studies, shows that this insertion mutant binds EGFR TKIs with a binding mode and apparent affinity similar to that of WT EGFR.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
The ratio Ki/Km[ATP] provides a better estimate of potency than Ki alone.
“Because inhibitors must compete with substrate ATP for binding, the ratio of Ki/Km[ATP] provides a better estimate of potency that the Ki alone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Exon 19 deletions and L858R are oncogenic in cell lines and mouse models.
“These EGFR mutations are oncogenic in both cell lines and mouse models 9,10.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [9] Politi K Zakowski MF Fan PD Schonfeld EA Pao W Varmus HE Lung adenocarcinomas induced in mice by mutant EGF receptors found in human lung cancers respond to a tyrosine kinase inhibitor or to down-regulation of the receptors Genes Dev 2006 20 1496 1510 16705038 PMC1475762 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] Ji H Li D Chen L Shimamura T Kobayashi S McNamara K Mahmood U Mitchell A Sun Y Al Hashem R Chirieac LR Padera R Bronson RT Kim W Janne PA Shapiro GI Tenen D Johnson BE Weissleder R Sharpless NE Wong KK The impact of human EGFR kinase domain mutations on lung tumorigenesis and in vivo sensitivity to EGFR-targeted therapies Cancer Cell 2006 9 485 495 16730237 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The sensitivity of EGFR-L858R and exon 19 deletions to TKIs stems from enhanced intrinsic affinity for TKIs and markedly decreased affinity for ATP.
“The exquisite sensitivity of EGFR-L858R and exon 19 deletions to EGFR TKIs stems from two effects: their enhanced intrinsic affinity for these TKIs and their markedly decreased affinity for substrate ATP 38,39.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [38] Yun CH Boggon TJ Li Y Woo MS Greulich H Meyerson M Eck MJ Structures of lung cancer-derived EGFR mutants and inhibitor complexes: mechanism of activation and insights into differential inhibitor sensitivity Cancer Cell 2007 11 217 227 17349580 PMC1939942 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [39] Carey KD Garton AJ Romero MS Kahler J Thomson S Ross S Park F Haley JD Gibson N Sliwkowski MX Kinetic analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor somatic mutant proteins shows increased sensitivity to the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, erlotinib Cancer Res 2006 66 8163 8171 16912195 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Most patients with exon 19 deletions or L858R have radiographic responses to gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib.
“Most patients whose tumors harbor exon 19 deletions or L858R EGFR activating mutations have radiographic responses to monotherapy with the reversible adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-competitive EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) gefitinib and erlotinib 17–23 and the irreversible EGFR TKI afatinib 24.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 8 sources checked- cites [17] Sequist LV Martins RG Spigel D Grunberg SM Spira A Janne PA Joshi VA McCollum D Evans TL Muzikansky A Kuhlmann GL Han M Goldberg JS Settleman J Iafrate AJ Engelman JA Haber DA Johnson BE Lynch TJ First-line gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring somatic EGFR mutations J Clin. Oncol 2008 26 2442 2449 18458038 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18] Costa DB Kobayashi S Tenen DG Huberman MS Pooled analysis of the prospective trials of gefitinib monotherapy for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancers Lung Cancer 2007 58 95 103 17610986 PMC2551312 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Rosell R Moran T Queralt C Porta R Cardenal F Camps C Majem M Lopez-Vivanco G Isla D Provencio M Insa A Massuti B Gonzalez-Larriba JL Paz-Ares L Bover I Garcia-Campelo R Moreno MA Catot S Rolfo C Reguart N Palmero R Sanchez JM Bastus R Mayo C Bertran-Alamillo J Molina MA Sanchez JJ Taron M Screening for epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer N. Engl. J Med 2009 361 958 967 19692684 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [20] Maemondo M Inoue A Kobayashi K Sugawara S Oizumi S Isobe H Gemma A Harada M Yoshizawa H Kinoshita I Fujita Y Okinaga S Hirano H Yoshimori K Harada T Ogura T Ando M Miyazawa H Tanaka T Saijo Y Hagiwara K Morita S Nukiwa T Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR N. Engl. J Med 2010 362 2380 2388 20573926 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21] Mitsudomi T Morita S Yatabe Y Negoro S Okamoto I Tsurutani J Seto T Satouchi M Tada H Hirashima T Asami K Katakami N Takada M Yoshioka H Shibata K Kudoh S Shimizu E Saito H Toyooka S Nakagawa K Fukuoka M Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3 trial Lancet Oncol 2010 11 121 128 20022809 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [22] Mok TS Wu YL Thongprasert S Yang CH Chu DT Saijo N Sunpaweravong P Han B Margono B Ichinose Y Nishiwaki Y Ohe Y Yang JJ Chewaskulyong B Jiang H Duffield EL Watkins CL Armour AA Fukuoka M Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma N. Engl. J Med 2009 361 947 957 19692680 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [23] Zhou C Wu Y-L Chen G Feng J Liu X Wang C Zhang S Wang J Zhou S Ren S Efficacy results from the randomized phase III OPTIMAL (CTONG 0802) study comparing first-line erlotinib versus carboplatin (CBDCA) plus gemcitabine (GEM), in Chinese advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (PTS) with EGFR activating mutations Ann. Oncol 2010 21 LBA13 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [24] Sequist LV Yang JC Yamamoto N O’Byrne K Hirsh V Mok T Geater SL Orlov S Tsai CM Boyer M Su WC Bennouna J Kato T Gorbunova V Lee KH Shah R Massey D Zazulina V Shahidi M Schuler M Phase III Study of Afatinib or Cisplatin Plus Pemetrexed in Patients With Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma With EGFR Mutations J Clin Oncol 2013 31 3327 3334 23816960 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The C-helix contains key active site residue E762 just N-terminal to the insertion site.
“The C-helix contains a key active site residue, E762, just N-terminal to the site of the insertion 50.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] Eck MJ Yun CH Structural and mechanistic underpinnings of the differential drug sensitivity of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010 1804 559 566 20026433 PMC2859716 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
NSCLCs harboring EGFR A763_Y764insFQEA appear to respond to gefitinib and erlotinib.
“Thus, as predicted by our preclinical studies, NSCLCs harboring EGFR A763_Y764insFQEA appear to respond to gefitinib and erlotinib.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The most common exon 20 insertions are post C-helix insertions of 1-4 amino acids, accounting for 80-90% of all exon 20 insertions.
“The most common EGFR exon 20 insertions that have been reported in NSCLC samples are post C-helix insertions of one to four amino-acids, which in aggregate account for 80–90% of all exon 20 insertions 31,32,35.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [31] Oxnard GR Lo PC Nishino M Dahlberg SE Lindeman NI Butaney M Jackman DM Johnson BE Janne PA Natural history and molecular characteristics of lung cancers harboring EGFR exon 20 insertions J Thorac. Oncol 2013 8 179 184 23328547 PMC3549533 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [32] Arcila ME Nafa K Chaft JE Rekhtman N Lau C Reva BA Zakowski MF Kris MG Ladanyi M EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in lung adenocarcinomas: prevalence, molecular heterogeneity, and clinicopathologic characteristics Mol. Cancer Ther 2013 12 220 229 23371856 PMC3714231 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [35] Yasuda H Kobayashi S Costa DB EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: preclinical data and clinical implications Lancet Oncol 2012 13 e23 e31 21764376 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Mutations affecting amino acids Y764 to V774 should be classified as non-sensitizing to reversible EGFR TKIs gefitinib and erlotinib.
“the aforementioned mutations affecting amino-acids Y764 to V774 should be classified as non-sensitizing to the reversible EGFR TKIs gefitinib and erlotinib.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
EGFR A763_Y764insFQEA accounts for 10-20% of all reported EGFR exon 20 insertions.
“This sequence alteration accounts for 10–20% of all reported EGFR exon 20 insertions 31,32,35.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [31] Oxnard GR Lo PC Nishino M Dahlberg SE Lindeman NI Butaney M Jackman DM Johnson BE Janne PA Natural history and molecular characteristics of lung cancers harboring EGFR exon 20 insertions J Thorac. Oncol 2013 8 179 184 23328547 PMC3549533 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [32] Arcila ME Nafa K Chaft JE Rekhtman N Lau C Reva BA Zakowski MF Kris MG Ladanyi M EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in lung adenocarcinomas: prevalence, molecular heterogeneity, and clinicopathologic characteristics Mol. Cancer Ther 2013 12 220 229 23371856 PMC3714231 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [35] Yasuda H Kobayashi S Costa DB EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: preclinical data and clinical implications Lancet Oncol 2012 13 e23 e31 21764376 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
BID007 cells are dependent on aberrant EGFR signaling.
“These results demonstrate that BID007 cells, similar to other EGFR mutated cell lines, are dependent on aberrant EGFR signaling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The model based on the active state supports the hypothesis that the glutamic acid in A763_Y764insFQEA can effectively replace E762 in the active site.
“The model based on the active state supports the hypothesis that the glutamic acid residue in the A763_Y764insFQEA insertion can effectively replace E762 in the active site (Fig. 4A, 4C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The inserted residues may sterically inhibit reorientation of the C-helix characteristic of the inactive state.
“thus the inserted residues may sterically inhibit the reorientation of the C-helix that is characteristic of the inactive state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: In the inactive state, the C-helix pivots outward and shifts by ~3.5Å toward the insertion site.
- Interpretationreasoning
The homology model of the inactive state suggests a mechanism of activation related to L858R.
“Examination of the homology model of the inactive state suggests a mechanism of activation related to that of L858R 38.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Yun CH Boggon TJ Li Y Woo MS Greulich H Meyerson M Eck MJ Structures of lung cancer-derived EGFR mutants and inhibitor complexes: mechanism of activation and insights into differential inhibitor sensitivity Cancer Cell 2007 11 217 227 17349580 PMC1939942 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
A763_Y764insFQEA must alter the structure of the β3-αC loop, like exon 19 deletion and insertion mutants.
“like both exon 19 deletion and insertion mutants 25, A763_Y764insFQEA must alter the structure of the β3-αC loop.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] He M Capelletti M Nafa K Yun CH Arcila ME Miller VA Ginsberg MS Zhao B Kris MG Eck MJ Janne PA Ladanyi M Oxnard GR EGFR exon 19 insertions: a new family of sensitizing EGFR mutations in lung adenocarcinoma Clin Cancer Res 2012 18 1790 1797 22190593 PMC3306520 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
BID007 cells are sensitive to clinically achievable submicromolar concentrations of gefitinib and erlotinib.
“BID007 cells were not only dependent on EGFR signaling but were also sensitive to clinically achievable submicromolar concentrations of gefitinib and erlotinib.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A shift in register toward the C-terminus would leave E762 unaltered.
“A shift in register toward the C-terminus would leave this catalytically important residue unaltered.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
D770_N771insNPG may activate EGFR by blocking conformational rearrangements required for the inactive conformation.
“D770_N771insNPG may activate EGFR by blocking the conformational rearrangements required for the inactive conformation of the kinase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: In the inactive state, the C-helix pivots outward and shifts by ~3.5Å toward the insertion site.
- Interpretationcitation
The mutation may interfere with an adjacent electrostatic switch interaction proposed to stabilize an inactive EGFR dimer.
“This mutation may also interfere with an adjacent “electrostatic switch” interaction that is proposed to stabilize an inactive EGFR dimer 49.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] Jura N Shan Y Cao X Shaw DE Kuriyan J Structural analysis of the catalytically inactive kinase domain of the human EGF receptor 3 Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2009 106 21608 21613 20007378 PMC2791034 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
D770_N771insNPG lacks the therapeutic-window Achilles' heel that L858R and exon 19 deletion mutants have.
“Unlike EGFR-L858R and exon 19 deletion mutants, the D770_N771insNPG mutation lacks this “Achilles’ heel”, since it activates EGFR without markedly diminishing its affinity for ATP or increasing its affinity for EGFR TKIs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
EGFR A763_Y764insFQEA is an EGFR TKI-sensitizing mutation.
“Consequently, we conclude that EGFR A763_Y764insFQEA is an EGFR TKI-sensitizing mutation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The T790M structural alteration enabled discovery of inhibitors that selectively inhibit T790M-bearing mutants, when in association with L858R or exon 19 deletions, relative to WT EGFR.
“Thus, the T790M structural alteration in essence “enabled” discovery of inhibitors that selectively inhibit T790M–bearing mutants, when in association with L858R or exon 19 deletions, relative to WT EGFR 58,59.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [58] Zhou W Ercan D Chen L Yun CH Li D Capelletti M Cortot AB Chirieac L Iacob RE Padera R Engen JR Wong KK Eck MJ Gray NS Janne PA Novel mutant-selective EGFR kinase inhibitors against EGFR T790M Nature 2009 462 1070 1074 20033049 PMC2879581 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [59] Lee HJ Schaefer G Heffron TP Shao L Ye X Sideris S Malek S Chan E Merchant M La H Ubhayakar S Yauch RL Pirazzoli V Politi K Settleman J Noncovalent wild-type-sparing inhibitors of EGFR T790M Cancer Discov 2013 3 168 181 23229345 PMC3576842 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The similar ATP and TKI binding properties of D770_N771insNPG compared with WT EGFR suggest that it will be difficult to achieve the requisite selectivity versus WT receptor.
“Additionally, the similar ATP and TKI binding properties of this mutant, as compared with WT EGFR, suggest that it will be difficult to achieve the requisite selectivity versus the WT receptor 39,50,56,58,59.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [39] Carey KD Garton AJ Romero MS Kahler J Thomson S Ross S Park F Haley JD Gibson N Sliwkowski MX Kinetic analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor somatic mutant proteins shows increased sensitivity to the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, erlotinib Cancer Res 2006 66 8163 8171 16912195 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [50] Eck MJ Yun CH Structural and mechanistic underpinnings of the differential drug sensitivity of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010 1804 559 566 20026433 PMC2859716 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [56] Mulloy R Ferrand A Kim Y Sordella R Bell DW Haber DA Anderson KS Settleman J Epidermal growth factor receptor mutants from human lung cancers exhibit enhanced catalytic activity and increased sensitivity to gefitinib Cancer Res 2007 67 2325 2330 17332364 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
In sensitive EGFR mutants, serum concentrations can be achieved that functionally shut down oncogenic mutant EGFR but relatively spare WT receptor in the skin and gastrointestinal tract.
“In these sensitive EGFR mutants, serum concentrations can be achieved that functionally shut down the oncogenic mutant EGFR, but relatively spare the WT receptor in the skin and gastrointestinal tract.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The enhanced sensitivity of L858R and exon 19 deletion mutants relative to WT EGFR creates the therapeutic window that makes gefitinib and erlotinib useful drugs.
“Because the dose-limiting toxicities of gefitinib and erlotinib arise from inhibition of WT EGFR in normal tissues, the enhanced sensitivity of these mutants relative to WT EGFR effectively creates the “therapeutic window” that makes gefitinib and erlotinib useful drugs 39,50,56.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [39] Carey KD Garton AJ Romero MS Kahler J Thomson S Ross S Park F Haley JD Gibson N Sliwkowski MX Kinetic analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor somatic mutant proteins shows increased sensitivity to the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, erlotinib Cancer Res 2006 66 8163 8171 16912195 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [50] Eck MJ Yun CH Structural and mechanistic underpinnings of the differential drug sensitivity of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010 1804 559 566 20026433 PMC2859716 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [56] Mulloy R Ferrand A Kim Y Sordella R Bell DW Haber DA Anderson KS Settleman J Epidermal growth factor receptor mutants from human lung cancers exhibit enhanced catalytic activity and increased sensitivity to gefitinib Cancer Res 2007 67 2325 2330 17332364 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The dose-limiting toxicities of gefitinib and erlotinib arise from inhibition of WT EGFR in normal tissues.
“Because the dose-limiting toxicities of gefitinib and erlotinib arise from inhibition of WT EGFR in normal tissues, the enhanced sensitivity of these mutants relative to WT EGFR effectively creates the “therapeutic window” that makes gefitinib and erlotinib useful drugs 39,50,56.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [39] Carey KD Garton AJ Romero MS Kahler J Thomson S Ross S Park F Haley JD Gibson N Sliwkowski MX Kinetic analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor somatic mutant proteins shows increased sensitivity to the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, erlotinib Cancer Res 2006 66 8163 8171 16912195 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [50] Eck MJ Yun CH Structural and mechanistic underpinnings of the differential drug sensitivity of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010 1804 559 566 20026433 PMC2859716 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [56] Mulloy R Ferrand A Kim Y Sordella R Bell DW Haber DA Anderson KS Settleman J Epidermal growth factor receptor mutants from human lung cancers exhibit enhanced catalytic activity and increased sensitivity to gefitinib Cancer Res 2007 67 2325 2330 17332364 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
EGFR-A763_Y764insFQEA and the identical D761_E762insEAFQ amino acid sequence appear unique among reported EGFR exon 20 insertions in having the ability to induce an N-terminal shift in the C-helix while maintaining or replacing active site residue E762.
“EGFR-A763_Y764insFQEA and the identical D761_E762insEAFQ amino acid sequence appear to be unique among reported EGFR exon 20 insertions in having the ability to induce an N-terminal shift in the C-helix while maintaining or replacing active site residue E762.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
At a structural and enzyme kinetic level, A763_Y764insFQEA may more closely resemble L858R and exon 19 deletion mutants than other exon 20 insertion mutations.
“Thus at a structural and enzyme kinetic level, A763_Y764insFQEA may more closely resemble the L858R and exon 19 deletion mutants than it does other exon 20 insertion mutations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The clinical resistance of D770_N771insNPG does not stem from steric interference with inhibitor binding.
“Thus the clinical resistance of this mutant does not stem from steric interference with inhibitor binding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The EGFR-T790M mutation confers resistance by reversing the sensitization conferred by primary activating mutations.
“The EGFR-T790M mutation confers resistance by reversing the sensitization conferred by primary activating mutations, but it does so by altering the gatekeeper residue in the ATP-site that is known to be an important determinant of inhibitor specificity 50,57.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [50] Eck MJ Yun CH Structural and mechanistic underpinnings of the differential drug sensitivity of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010 1804 559 566 20026433 PMC2859716 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [57] Yun CH Mengwasser KE Toms AV Woo MS Greulich H Wong KK Meyerson M Eck MJ The T790M mutation in EGFR kinase causes drug resistance by increasing the affinity for ATP Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2008 105 2070 2075 18227510 PMC2538882 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Other EGFR exon 20 insertion mutants that insert one to three residues at or near the end of the C-helix are expected to have a similar structural effect to D770_N771insNPG.
“While each will differ in detail, we expect that other EGFR exon 20 insertion mutants that insert one to three residues at or near the end of the C-helix will have a similar structural effect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: D770_N771insNPG is a representative EGFR TKI-insensitive exon 20 insertion mutation.
- May combine two claims. 33
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 12
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataA763_Y764insFQEA had a Ki for gefitinib of 2.5 nM, comparable to L858R (6.4 nM).
“The Ki value for A763_Y764insFQEA (2.5 nM) was comparable to that we measured for the L858R mutant (6.4 nM).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll other studied exon 20 insertions and T790M-bearing mutations had erlotinib IC50s above 2 μM; most exon 20 insertions were not inhibited by submicromolar reversible EGFR TKIs.
“All other EGFR exon 20 insertions and T790M–bearing mutations had 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50s) that exceeded 2 µM erlotinib (Fig. 1B, 1C and Sup. Table 2).”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · boosted
“our data confirm that most exon 20 insertions are not inhibited by submicromolar concentrations of reversible EGFR TKIs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · boosted
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataBa/F3 cells stably expressing the studied EGFR mutations proliferate without IL3, indicating transforming ability.
“All were able to proliferate in the absence of IL3 (Sup. Fig. 1), indicating transforming ability of these mutations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth D770_N771insNPG and A763_Y764insFQEA had higher catalytic activity than WT EGFR, but less than L858R.
“both insertion mutants exhibited higher catalytic activity than WT EGFR; although they were not as active as EGFR-L858R (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA763_Y764insFQEA showed inhibition of downstream phosphorylation and upregulation of BIM similar to L858R.
“the inhibition of these downstream phosphorylation events and upregulation of BIM were seen with EGFR-A763_Y764insFQEA in a similar fashion as with inhibitor-sensitive L858R (Fig. 1D, 1E)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEGFR-specific siRNAs decreased EGFR expression and suppressed growth in BID007 and H3255.
“In both BID007 and H3255, EGFR-specific siRNAs decreased expression of EGFR and suppressed cell growth (Fig. 3B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA763_Y764insFQEA had an IC50 of <0.05 μM to erlotinib or gefitinib, more than 10-fold lower than clinically achievable serum concentrations.
“In vitro characterization of A763_Y764insFQEA demonstrated that it had an IC50 of < 0.05µM to erlotinib or gefitinib, which is more than 10-fold lower than the clinically achievable serum concentrations of these EGFR TKIs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTogether with D770, the three inserted residues form a tight turn with a hydrogen bond between the main chain carbonyl of D770 and the amide of the inserted glycine.
“Together with D770, the three inserted residues form a tight turn, with a hydrogen bond formed between the main chain carbonyl of D770 and the amide of the inserted glycine (Fig. 4B, Sup. Fig. 10B, 10C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataD770_N771insNPG adopts an active conformation with the C-helix in its inward position.
“The D770_N771insNPG mutant adopts an active conformation with the C-helix in its inward position (Fig. 4A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSubmicromolar erlotinib inhibited EGFR phosphorylation in A763_Y764insFQEA mutant cells, deactivated PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK pathways, and induced apoptosis.
“submicromolar concentrations of erlotinib inhibited phosphorylation of EGFR in A763_Y764insFQEA mutant cells, led to deactivation of the PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK pathways, and subsequently induced apoptosis in our models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDifferences between D770_N771insNPG and L858R structures include a small change in relative orientation of N- and C-lobes and a fully ordered activation loop in D770_N771insNPG but not in L858R.
“Differences, which likely arise from the divergent crystal packing in D770_N771insNPG, include a small change in the relative orientation of the N- and C-lobes, and the conformation of the activation loop, which is fully ordered in the D770_N771insNPG structure but not in the present L858R structure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataBID007 had slight amplification of region around chromosome 7 corresponding to EGFR.
“The region around chromosome 7, corresponding to EGFR, demonstrated slight amplification (Sup. Fig. 9B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA763_Y764insFQEA is activated relative to WT EGFR and much more potently inhibited by gefitinib than WT EGFR.
“Our kinetic characterization of this mutant revealed that it is activated, relative to WT EGFR, and that it is much more potently inhibited by gefitinib than is WT EGFR.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHomology models of A763_Y764insFQEA using active and inactive conformations show the insertion modeled in helical conformation, shifting register N-terminus and resulting in longer β3-αC loop.
“In both models, the insertion was modeled in a helical conformation, shifting the register of the C-helix toward its N-terminus, and resulting in a longer loop at its N-terminal end (the β3-αC loop).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe FQEA insertion is compatible with asymmetric dimer formation, and size-exclusion chromatography revealed a monomer-dimer equilibrium in solution.
“inspection of the model indicates that the FQEA insertion is compatible with formation of the asymmetric dimer and, consistent with this, analysis of the A763_Y764insFQEA mutant using size-exclusion chromatography revealed a monomer-dimer equilibrium in solution (Sup. Fig. 11).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataE762Q_insFQEA was highly active in a ligand-independent manner, while A763_Y764insFQQA was inactive.
“We found that E762Q_insFQEA, like A763_Y764insFQEA, was highly active in a ligand independent manner but A763_Y764insFQQA was inactive (Fig. 5B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataBID007 had focal deletion encompassing CDKN2A.
“BID007 had a focal area of deletion encompassing the CDKN2A tumor suppressor gene (Sup. Fig. 9C); an area commonly deleted in cancers 45.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Weir BA Woo MS Getz G Perner S Ding L Beroukhim R Lin WM Province MA Kraja A Johnson LA Shah K Sato M Thomas RK Barletta JA Borecki IB Broderick S Chang AC Chiang DY Chirieac LR Cho J Fujii Y Gazdar AF Giordano T Greulich H Hanna M Johnson BE Kris MG Lash A Lin L Lindeman N Mardis ER McPherson JD Minna JD Morgan MB Nadel M Orringer MB Osborne JR Ozenberger B Ramos AH Robinson J Roth JA Rusch V Sasaki H Shepherd F Sougnez C Spitz MR Tsao MS Twomey D Verhaak RG Weinstock GM Wheeler DA Winckler W Yoshizawa A Yu S Zakowski MF Zhang Q Beer DG Wistuba II Watson MA Garraway LA Ladanyi M Travis WD Pao
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningD770_N771insNPG activates EGFR without markedly diminishing its affinity for ATP or increasing its affinity for EGFR TKIs.
“Unlike EGFR-L858R and exon 19 deletion mutants, the D770_N771insNPG mutation lacks this “Achilles’ heel”, since it activates EGFR without markedly diminishing its affinity for ATP or increasing its affinity for EGFR TKIs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe most common EGFR mutations are exon 19 deletions around LREA (45%) and L858R (40%).
“The most common EGFR mutations are in-frame deletions around the LREA motif (amino-acid residues 747 to 750) of exon 19 (45% of EGFR mutations) and the exon 21 L858R point mutation (40% of EGFR mutations) 5,6,8.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [5] Shigematsu H Lin L Takahashi T Nomura M Suzuki M Wistuba II Fong KM Lee H Toyooka S Shimizu N Fujisawa T Feng Z Roth JA Herz J Minna JD Gazdar AF Clinical and biological features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung cancers J Natl. Cancer Inst 2005 97 339 346 15741570
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [6] Sequist LV Bell DW Lynch TJ Haber DA Molecular predictors of response to epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in non-small-cell lung cancer J Clin. Oncol 2007 25 587 595 17290067
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] Tokumo M Toyooka S Kiura K Shigematsu H Tomii K Aoe M Ichimura K Tsuda T Yano M Tsukuda K Tabata M Ueoka H Tanimoto M Date H Gazdar AF Shimizu N The relationship between epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and clinicopathologic features in non-small cell lung cancers Clin. Cancer Res 2005 11 1167 1173 15709185
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationExon 20 insertion mutations make up 4-10% of all EGFR mutations in NSCLC.
“Exon 20 insertion mutations comprise 4–10% of all EGFR mutations 27,29–32.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [27] Mitsudomi T Yatabe Y Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene and related genes as determinants of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors sensitivity in lung cancer Cancer Sci 2007 98 1817 1824 17888036 PMC11159145
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [29] Choi YL Soda M Yamashita Y Ueno T Takashima J Nakajima T Yatabe Y Takeuchi K Hamada T Haruta H Ishikawa Y Kimura H Mitsudomi T Tanio Y Mano H EML4-ALK mutations in lung cancer that confer resistance to ALK inhibitors N. Engl. J Med 2010 363 1734 1739 20979473
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [30] Pao W Chmielecki J Rational, biologically based treatment of EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer Nat. Rev. Cancer 2010 10 760 774 20966921 PMC3072803 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [31] Oxnard GR Lo PC Nishino M Dahlberg SE Lindeman NI Butaney M Jackman DM Johnson BE Janne PA Natural history and molecular characteristics of lung cancers harboring EGFR exon 20 insertions J Thorac. Oncol 2013 8 179 184 23328547 PMC3549533
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [32] Arcila ME Nafa K Chaft JE Rekhtman N Lau C Reva BA Zakowski MF Kris MG Ladanyi M EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in lung adenocarcinomas: prevalence, molecular heterogeneity, and clinicopathologic characteristics Mol. Cancer Ther 2013 12 220 229 23371856 PMC3714231
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOther EGFR mutations (G719A/C/S, rare exon 19 insertions, L861Q) are associated with some sensitivity to gefitinib and erlotinib.
“Other EGFR mutations have also been associated with some sensitivity to gefitinib and erlotinib. These include exon 18 point mutations in position G719 (G719A, C or S - ∼3% of EGFR mutations), rare inframe exon 19 insertions 25, and the exon 21 L861Q mutant (∼2% of EGFR mutations) 26–28.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [25] He M Capelletti M Nafa K Yun CH Arcila ME Miller VA Ginsberg MS Zhao B Kris MG Eck MJ Janne PA Ladanyi M Oxnard GR EGFR exon 19 insertions: a new family of sensitizing EGFR mutations in lung adenocarcinoma Clin Cancer Res 2012 18 1790 1797 22190593 PMC3306520
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [26] Mitsudomi T Yatabe Y Epidermal growth factor receptor in relation to tumor development: EGFR gene and cancer FEBS J 2010 277 301 308 19922469
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27] Mitsudomi T Yatabe Y Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene and related genes as determinants of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors sensitivity in lung cancer Cancer Sci 2007 98 1817 1824 17888036 PMC11159145
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [28] Yeh P Chen H Andrews J Naser R Pao W Horn L DNA-Mutation Inventory to Refine and Enhance Cancer Treatment (DIRECT): A Catalog of Clinically Relevant Cancer Mutations to Enable Genome-Directed Anticancer Therapy Clin Cancer Res 2013 19 1894 1901 23344264 PMC4121886
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBased on Ki/Km[ATP], A763_Y764insFQEA is predicted to be almost as sensitive to gefitinib as L858R, while D770_N771insNPG is expected to be many fold less sensitive.
“Based on this measure, A763_Y764insFQEA is predicted to be almost as sensitive to gefitinib as the L858R mutant, whereas D770_N771insNPG is expected to be many fold less sensitive (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost exon 20 insertion mutations lie near the end of the C-helix after M766, while a small subset map to the middle of the C-helix affecting E762 to Y764.
“Most of these mutations lie near the end of the C-helix within the N-lobe of the kinase, after residue M766, but a small subset map to the middle of the C-helix (affecting amino-acids E762 to Y764) 5,33,34.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [5] Shigematsu H Lin L Takahashi T Nomura M Suzuki M Wistuba II Fong KM Lee H Toyooka S Shimizu N Fujisawa T Feng Z Roth JA Herz J Minna JD Gazdar AF Clinical and biological features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung cancers J Natl. Cancer Inst 2005 97 339 346 15741570
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [33] Murray S Dahabreh IJ Linardou H Manoloukos M Bafaloukos D Kosmidis P Somatic mutations of the tyrosine kinase domain of epidermal growth factor receptor and tyrosine kinase inhibitor response to TKIs in non-small cell lung cancer: an analytical database J Thorac. Oncol 2008 3 832 839 18670300
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [34] Linardou H Dahabreh IJ Bafaloukos D Kosmidis P Murray S Somatic EGFR mutations and efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in NSCLC Nat. Rev. Clin Oncol 2009 6 352 366 19483740
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost NSCLCs with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations do not respond radiographically or clinically to gefitinib or erlotinib, with reported response rate below 5%.
“Unlike EGFR exon 19 deletions and L858R–bearing tumors, most NSCLCs with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations don’t respond radiographically or clinically to gefitinib or erlotinib. The reported response rate (RR) is below 5% and most patients have short intervals of disease control 35.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] Yasuda H Kobayashi S Costa DB EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: preclinical data and clinical implications Lancet Oncol 2012 13 e23 e31 21764376 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe study was limited by paucity of NSCLC cell lines with exon 20 insertions, lack of in vivo models, and small number of exon 20 insertion mutated NSCLC cases treated with reversible TKIs.
“Our study was limited by a number of factors, including a paucity of available NSCLC cell lines with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations, a lack of in vivo models and the small number of exon 20 insertion mutated NSCLC cases that were treated with reversible EGFR TKIs in our centers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataStructure and kinetic data show D770_N771insNPG promotes the active conformation, reflected by enhanced catalytic activity and propensity to form asymmetric dimer.
“our structure and kinetic data show that D770_N771insNPG promotes the active conformation, as reflected by its enhanced catalytic activity (Table 1) and a propensity to form the asymmetric dimer as seen in the crystal structure (Sup. Fig. 10A) and in solution (Sup. Fig. 11).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA shift toward the N-terminus would displace E762 by one turn but effectively replace it with a glutamic acid residue introduced by the insertion.
“Alternatively, a shift toward the N-terminus would displace this residue by one turn, but effectively replace it with a glutamic acid residue introduced by the insertion (FQEA, Fig. 5A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMutation of L747 in this cluster to proline or serine is believed to underlie the activity of EGFR-exon 19 insertions.
“mutation of L747 in this cluster to proline or serine is believed to underlie the activity of EGFR-exon 19 insertions 25.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] He M Capelletti M Nafa K Yun CH Arcila ME Miller VA Ginsberg MS Zhao B Kris MG Eck MJ Janne PA Ladanyi M Oxnard GR EGFR exon 19 insertions: a new family of sensitizing EGFR mutations in lung adenocarcinoma Clin Cancer Res 2012 18 1790 1797 22190593 PMC3306520
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBinding of gefitinib and erlotinib is expected to be unperturbed in D770_N771insNPG, consistent with similar Ki values for gefitinib between D770_N771insNPG and WT EGFR.
“Likewise, we expect that binding of gefitinib and erlotinib would be unperturbed in this mutant, consistent with the closely similar Ki values for gefitinib we measure for D770_N771insNPG and WT EGFR (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
InterpretationreasoningThe de facto I759A replacement caused by FQEA insertion may activate EGFR via destabilization of the inactive conformation.
“Thus we hypothesize that the de facto I759A replacement caused by the FQEA insertion may activate EGFR via a similar mechanism (destabilization of the inactive conformation).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: I759, together with L747, L858, and L861, forms a cluster of interacting hydrophobic residues that helps stabilize the inactive conformation.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAsymmetric dimer interaction mediates EGFR activation by ligand-induced dimerization and is typically recapitulated in crystals of active EGFR kinase.
“This mode of interaction mediates EGFR activation by ligand-induced dimerization 48, and is typically recapitulated in crystals of the EGFR kinase in its active conformation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] Zhang X Gureasko J Shen K Cole PA Kuriyan J An allosteric mechanism for activation of the kinase domain of epidermal growth factor receptor Cell 2006 125 1137 1149 16777603
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe inserted residues are expected to form approximately one turn of helix and shift the register of adjacent residues either toward N-terminus or C-terminus.
“the four inserted residues are expected to form approximately one turn of helix and shift the register of adjacent residues in the helix, either toward the N-terminus or toward the C-terminus (Fig. 5A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The four inserted residues in A763_Y764insFQEA form approximately one turn of helix.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPD168393 is a preclinical irreversible anilinoquinazoline inhibitor structurally related to afatinib and dacomitinib.
“PD168393 is a pre-clinical irreversible anilinoquinazoline inhibitor that is structurally related to afatinib and dacomitinib 46,47.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [46] Engelman JA Zejnullahu K Gale CM Lifshits E Gonzales AJ Shimamura T Zhao F Vincent PW Naumov GN Bradner JE Althaus IW Gandhi L Shapiro GI Nelson JM Heymach JV Meyerson M Wong KK Janne PA PF00299804, an irreversible pan-ERBB inhibitor, is effective in lung cancer models with EGFR and ERBB2 mutations that are resistant to gefitinib Cancer Res 2007 67 11924 11932 18089823 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [47] Li D Ambrogio L Shimamura T Kubo S Takahashi M Chirieac LR Padera RF Shapiro GI Baum A Himmelsbach F Rettig WJ Meyerson M Solca F Greulich H Wong KK BIBW2992, an irreversible EGFR/HER2 inhibitor highly effective in preclinical lung cancer models Oncogene 2008 27 4702 4711 18408761 PMC2748240 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationL858R and L861Q mutations within the hydrophobic cluster are well-characterized activating mutations.
“The L858R and L861Q mutations within this cluster are well-characterized activating mutations 28”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Yeh P Chen H Andrews J Naser R Pao W Horn L DNA-Mutation Inventory to Refine and Enhance Cancer Treatment (DIRECT): A Catalog of Clinically Relevant Cancer Mutations to Enable Genome-Directed Anticancer Therapy Clin Cancer Res 2013 19 1894 1901 23344264 PMC4121886
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe insertion shifts the register of the C-helix in the N-terminal direction, and the glutamic acid in FQEA assumes the active site role of E762 in WT kinase.
“Thus, we conclude that the insertion shifts the register of the helix in the N-terminal direction and that the glutamic acid residue in the FQEA insertion assumes the active site role of E762 in the WT kinase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationL858R and exon 19 deletion mutants exhibit increased Km[ATP] and higher affinity (5-10 fold) for gefitinib or erlotinib than WT EGFR.
“L858R and exon 19 deletion mutants exhibit increased Km[ATP] and higher affinity (5–10 fold) for gefitinib or erlotinib than the WT receptor 39,50,56.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [39] Carey KD Garton AJ Romero MS Kahler J Thomson S Ross S Park F Haley JD Gibson N Sliwkowski MX Kinetic analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor somatic mutant proteins shows increased sensitivity to the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, erlotinib Cancer Res 2006 66 8163 8171 16912195
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [50] Eck MJ Yun CH Structural and mechanistic underpinnings of the differential drug sensitivity of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010 1804 559 566 20026433 PMC2859716
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [56] Mulloy R Ferrand A Kim Y Sordella R Bell DW Haber DA Anderson KS Settleman J Epidermal growth factor receptor mutants from human lung cancers exhibit enhanced catalytic activity and increased sensitivity to gefitinib Cancer Res 2007 67 2325 2330 17332364
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenStructurally, EGFR-A763_Y764insFQEA is very different from other exon 20 insertions.
“Structurally, EGFR-A763_Y764insFQEA is very different from other exon 20 insertions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe increased Km[ATP] and higher TKI affinity of L858R and exon 19 deletion mutants, together with the oncogene-addicted state of tumors bearing these mutations, explain their sensitivity to EGFR TKIs.
“Together with the oncogene-addicted state of tumors bearing these mutations 39,50,56, these factors explain their sensitivity to EGFR TKIs 50.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] Eck MJ Yun CH Structural and mechanistic underpinnings of the differential drug sensitivity of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010 1804 559 566 20026433 PMC2859716
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
InterpretationreasoningThe I759A alteration may lead to catalytic activation in a manner related to L858R/L861Q.
“we hypothesize that it leads to catalytic activation in a related manner.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationTumors bearing L858R or exon 19 deletion mutations are oncogene-addicted.
“Together with the oncogene-addicted state of tumors bearing these mutations 39,50,56, these factors explain their sensitivity to EGFR TKIs 50.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [39] Carey KD Garton AJ Romero MS Kahler J Thomson S Ross S Park F Haley JD Gibson N Sliwkowski MX Kinetic analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor somatic mutant proteins shows increased sensitivity to the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, erlotinib Cancer Res 2006 66 8163 8171 16912195
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [50] Eck MJ Yun CH Structural and mechanistic underpinnings of the differential drug sensitivity of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010 1804 559 566 20026433 PMC2859716
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [56] Mulloy R Ferrand A Kim Y Sordella R Bell DW Haber DA Anderson KS Settleman J Epidermal growth factor receptor mutants from human lung cancers exhibit enhanced catalytic activity and increased sensitivity to gefitinib Cancer Res 2007 67 2325 2330 17332364
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationT790M resistance involves alteration of the gatekeeper residue in the ATP-site, which is an important determinant of inhibitor specificity.
“The EGFR-T790M mutation confers resistance by reversing the sensitization conferred by primary activating mutations, but it does so by altering the gatekeeper residue in the ATP-site that is known to be an important determinant of inhibitor specificity 50,57.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [50] Eck MJ Yun CH Structural and mechanistic underpinnings of the differential drug sensitivity of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010 1804 559 566 20026433 PMC2859716
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [57] Yun CH Mengwasser KE Toms AV Woo MS Greulich H Wong KK Meyerson M Eck MJ The T790M mutation in EGFR kinase causes drug resistance by increasing the affinity for ATP Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2008 105 2070 2075 18227510 PMC2538882
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEGFR monoclonal antibodies and EGFR WT kinase sparing covalent T790M selective TKIs are ineffective in typical EGFR exon 20 insertion mutants.
“Indeed, it seems that EGFR monoclonal antibodies 60 and EGFR WT kinase sparing covalent T790M selective TKIs 61 are ineffective in typical EGFR exon 20 insertion mutants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [60] Cho J Chen L Sangji N Okabe T Yonesaka K Francis JM Flavin RJ Johnson W Kwon J Yu S Greulich HE Johnson BE Eck MJ Janne PA Wong KK Meyerson M Cetuximab response of lung cancer-derived EGF receptor mutants is associated with asymmetric dimerization Cancer Res 2013 PMC3903789 24063894
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [61] Walter AO Tjin Tham SR Haringsma HJ Ohashi K Sun J Lee K Dubrovskiy A Labenski M Zhu Z Wang Z Sheets M St Martin T Karp R van Kalken D Chaturvedi P Niu D Nacht M Petter RC Westlin W Lin K Jaw-Tsai S Raponi M Van Dyke T Etter J Weaver Z Pao W Singh J Simmons AD Harding TC Allen A Discovery of a mutant-selective covalent inhibitor of EGFR that overcomes T790M–mediated resistance in NSCLC Cancer Discov 2013 PMC4048995 24065731 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataStructural analysis and supporting mutagenesis indicate that the inserted FQEA sequence shifts the register of the C-helix toward its N-terminus, altering the length of the β3-αC loop and effectively leading to an I759A replacement.
“our structural analysis and supporting mutagenesis indicate that the inserted FQEA sequence shifts the register of the C-helix toward its N-terminus, altering the length of the β3-αC loop leading into the helix and effectively leading to an I759A replacement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The concentration of ATP in cells approximates 1 mM.
“which approximates the concentration of ATP in cells”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The four inserted residues in A763_Y764insFQEA form approximately one turn of helix.
“the four inserted residues are expected to form approximately one turn of helix”
The paper relies on this without support.
In the inactive state, the C-helix pivots outward and shifts by ~3.5Å toward the insertion site.
“In the inactive state, the C-helix pivots outward, and shifts by ∼3.5Å toward the insertion site.”
The paper relies on this without support.
I759, together with L747, L858, and L861, forms a cluster of interacting hydrophobic residues that helps stabilize the inactive conformation.
“Isoleucine at position 759, together with L747, L858 and L861, is part of a cluster of interacting hydrophobic residues that helps to stabilize the inactive conformation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
D770_N771insNPG is a representative EGFR TKI-insensitive exon 20 insertion mutation.
“The structure of D770_N771insNPG, which we studied as a representative EGFR TKI-insensitive exon 20 mutation, shows how the three amino acid insertion forms a “wedge” at the end of the C-helix that may effectively lock the helix in its inward, active position.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Very few EGFR exon 20 insertions, such as A763_Y764insFQEA, have demonstrated sensitivity to first- and second-generation EGFR TKIs.
“Very few of these EGFRex20ins such as A763_Y764insFQEA have demonstrated sensitivity to 1st and 2nd generation EGFR TKIs”
From Diverse EGFR Exon 20 Insertions and Co-Occurring Molecular Alterations Identified by Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of NSCLC (2018) · cites this paper as [9]
Structural modeling and binding affinity studies showed that first-generation EGFR TKI binding affinity for representative EGFR exon 20 insertions is similar to that of wild-type EGFR.
“Structural modeling and binding affinity studies of representative EGFR exon 20 insertions showed that 1st generation EGFR TKI binding affinity is similar to that of wild-type EGFR”
From Diverse EGFR Exon 20 Insertions and Co-Occurring Molecular Alterations Identified by Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of NSCLC (2018) · cites this paper as [9]
Modeling of EGFR A763insFQEA demonstrated that insertions before residue 764 do not exhibit this effect and do not induce drug resistance.
“However, modeling of EGFR A763insFQEA demonstrated that insertions before residue 764 do not exhibit this effect and do not induce drug resistance16.”
From Mechanisms and clinical activity of an EGFR and HER2 exon 20–selective kinase inhibitor in non–small cell lung cancer (2018) · cites this paper as [16]
Crystallography of EGFR exon 20 insertion D770insNPG revealed a stabilized and rigid active conformation that induces resistance to first-generation TKIs in insertions after residue 764.
“Crystallography of the EGFR exon 20 insertion D770insNPG has revealed a stabilized and rigid active conformation inducing resistance to first-generation TKIs in the insertions after residue 764.”
From Mechanisms and clinical activity of an EGFR and HER2 exon 20–selective kinase inhibitor in non–small cell lung cancer (2018) · cites this paper as [16]
Historical data show overall response rates of about 3-8% to first-line erlotinib, gefitinib, or afatinib in patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations.
“Historical data for patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations have shown that overall response rates are approximately 3–8% to first-line therapy with erlotinib, gefitinib, or afatinib16,18.”
From Mechanisms and clinical activity of an EGFR and HER2 exon 20–selective kinase inhibitor in non–small cell lung cancer (2018) · cites this paper as [16]
Most activating EGFR-mutant NSCLCs respond to available EGFR TKIs, but a subset with EGFR or HER2 exon 20 alterations is intrinsically resistant and lacks effective therapy.
“Although most activating mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) are sensitive to available EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), a subset with alterations in exon 20 of EGFR and HER2 are intrinsically resistant and lack an effective therapy.”
From Mechanisms and clinical activity of an EGFR and HER2 exon 20–selective kinase inhibitor in non–small cell lung cancer (2018) · cites this paper as [16]
Clinical data and prior studies demonstrate limited activity of available EGFR TKIs in NSCLC driven by EGFR exon 20 insertion and validate the need for alternative treatment strategies.
“These clinical data as well as results from prior studies16,18 demonstrate the limited activity of the available EGFR TKIs in NSCLC driven by an EGFR exon 20 insertion and validate the need for alternative treatment strategies for these specific tumors.”
From Mechanisms and clinical activity of an EGFR and HER2 exon 20–selective kinase inhibitor in non–small cell lung cancer (2018) · cites this paper as [16]
Exon 20 of EGFR and HER2 contains two major regions, the α-C helix and the loop following it.
“Exon 20 of EGFR and HER2 contains two major regions, the α-C helix (residues 762–766 in EGFR and 770–774 in HER2) and the loop following the α-C helix (residues 767–774 in EGFR and 775–783 in HER2)16,19,20,27.”
From Mechanisms and clinical activity of an EGFR and HER2 exon 20–selective kinase inhibitor in non–small cell lung cancer (2018) · cites this paper as [16]
About 10-12% of EGFR-mutant NSCLC tumors have an in-frame insertion in exon 20 of EGFR and are generally resistant to EGFR TKIs.
“However, approximately 10–12% of EGFR-mutant NSCLC tumors have an in-frame insertion within exon 20 of EGFR6,15,16,17 and are generally resistant to EGFR TKIs.”
From Mechanisms and clinical activity of an EGFR and HER2 exon 20–selective kinase inhibitor in non–small cell lung cancer (2018) · cites this paper as [16]
Only one crystal structure is available for an exon 20 variant (insNPG), and it reveals an inhibitor binding site essentially indistinguishable from that of the inhibitor-sensitive L858R mutant.
“Only one crystal structure is available for an exon 20 variant (the insNPG mutant) and it reveals an inhibitor binding site that is essentially indistinguishable from that of the inhibitor-sensitive L858R mutant (8).”
From Response Heterogeneity of EGFR and HER2 Exon 20 Insertions to Covalent EGFR and HER2 Inhibitors (2017) · cites this paper as [8]
There is significant clinical and biochemical heterogeneity among EGFR and HER2 exon 20 mutations.
“However, there is significant clinical and biochemical heterogeneity among EGFR or HER2 exon 20 mutations.”
From Response Heterogeneity of EGFR and HER2 Exon 20 Insertions to Covalent EGFR and HER2 Inhibitors (2017) · cites this paper as [8]
Previous studies identified EGFR A763_Y764insFQEA as sensitive to erlotinib, while most EGFR exon 20 mutations are resistant to EGFR inhibitors.
“Although the vast majority are associated with resistance to EGFR inhibitors, previous studies have identified a unique EGFR exon 20 mutation (A763_Y764insFQEA) that remained sensitive to erlotinib (8).”
From Response Heterogeneity of EGFR and HER2 Exon 20 Insertions to Covalent EGFR and HER2 Inhibitors (2017) · cites this paper as [8]
Most exon 20 insertion mutations, except the rare A763_Y764insFQEA, make tumors resistant to the standard first-line EGFR inhibitors erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib.
“EGFR Ex20Ins tumors are generally unresponsive to 1st and 2nd generation EGFR inhibitors”
From Antitumor Activity of Osimertinib, an Irreversible Mutant-Selective EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in NSCLC Harboring EGFR Exon 20 Insertions (2018) · cites this paper as [7]
Ex20Ins mutants lack T790M-associated structural differences proximate to the ATP-binding site.
“Although Ex20Ins mutants lack T790M-associated structural differences proximate to the ATP-binding site (7)”
From Antitumor Activity of Osimertinib, an Irreversible Mutant-Selective EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in NSCLC Harboring EGFR Exon 20 Insertions (2018) · cites this paper as [7]
Several studies have shown that 1G EGFR-TKI are less effective in patients with NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations compared with patients harboring common EGFR mutations.
“Several studies, although very small, have shown that 1G EGFR‐TKI are less effective in patients with NSCLC harboring such uncommon EGFR mutations, compared with patients harboring common EGFR mutations.”
Several studies indicate that different EGFR inhibitory effects of EGFR-TKIs might be associated with different structural-based interactions.
“Several studies, in which affinities between kinases and various EGFR‐TKI were investigated, indicate that the different EGFR inhibitory effects of EGFR‐TKI might be associated with the different structural‐based interactions.25, 44”
Like 1G EGFR-TKIs, afatinib might be less effective for most exon 20 insertions in preclinical and clinical studies.
“In contrast, like 1G EGFR‐TKI, afatinib might be less effective for most exon 20 insertions in preclinical and clinical studies.24, 25, 28, 42, 43”
A763_Y764insFQEA accounts for 7% of Ins20 mutations.
“Thus, this mutation, accounting for 7% of Ins20, should not be overlooked in clinical practice.63, 67”
From Not all epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer are created equal: Perspectives for individualized treatment strategy (2016) · cites this paper as [63]
In a compilation of data on treatment response to first-generation TKIs, objective response rate for Ins20 was only 17% (10/59).
“In a compilation of data on the treatment response to 1G‐TKI, ORR was only 17% (10/59) (Table 3).61, 62, 63, 64, 65”
From Not all epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer are created equal: Perspectives for individualized treatment strategy (2016) · cites this paper as [63]
Yasuda et al. reported an additional 31 types of Ins20 mutations.
“In addition, Yasuda et al. reported an additional 31 types of mutations.18, 63”
From Not all epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer are created equal: Perspectives for individualized treatment strategy (2016) · cites this paper as [63]
Not all exon 20 insertions or duplications are insensitive to EGFR TKIs; the FQEA insertion at A763_Y764 confers sensitivity to first- and second-generation EGFR TKIs.
“not all exon 20 insertions or duplications are insensitive to EGFR TKIs, with the FQEA insertion at position A763_Y764 (in the middle of the c-helix) conferring sensitivity to firstand second-generation EGFR TKIs.60,64”
Cites
<i>Coot</i> : model-building tools for molecular graphics
Emsley, P., & Cowtan, K. (2004) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444904019158 · Cited by 30,571 · see citing works
<i>Phaser</i> crystallographic software
McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C., & Read, R. J. (2007) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0021889807021206 · Cited by 20,612 · see citing works
Crystallography & NMR System: A New Software Suite for Macromolecular Structure Determination
Brünger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., DeLano, W. L., Gros, P., Grosse‐Kunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J., Kuszewski, J. J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N., et al. (1998) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444998003254 · Cited by 15,720 · see citing works
Refinement of Macromolecular Structures by the Maximum-Likelihood Method
Murshudov, G. N., Vagin, A. A., & Dodson, E. J. (1997) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444996012255 · Cited by 14,671 · see citing works
Siegel, R., Naishadham, D., & Jemal, A. (2013) · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21166 · Cited by 11,825 · see citing works
Lynch, T. J., Bell, D. W., Sordella, R., Gurubhagavatula, S., Okimoto, R. A., Brannigan, B. W., Harris, P. L., Haserlat, S. M., Supko, J. G., Haluska, F. G., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040938 · Cited by 11,486 · see citing works
<i>EGFR</i> Mutations in Lung Cancer: Correlation with Clinical Response to Gefitinib Therapy
Paez, J. G., Jänne, P. A., Lee, J. C., Tracy, S., Greulich, H., Gabriel, S., Herman, P., Kaye, F. J., Lindeman, N., Boggon, T. J., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099314 · Cited by 9,368 · see citing works
Self-citationGefitinib or Carboplatin–Paclitaxel in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma
Mok, T. S., Wu, Y.-L., Thongprasert, S., Yang, C.-H., Chu, D.-T., Saijo, N., Sunpaweravong, P., Han, B., Margono, B., Ichinose, Y., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0810699 · Cited by 8,261 · see citing works
Gefitinib or Chemotherapy for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Mutated EGFR
Maemondo, M., Inoue, A., Kobayashi, K., Sugawara, S., Oizumi, S., Isobe, H., Gemma, A., Harada, M., Yoshizawa, H., Kinoshita, I., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0909530 · Cited by 5,525 · see citing works
PRODRG: a tool for high-throughput crystallography of protein–ligand complexes
Schüttelkopf, A. W., & van Aalten, D. M. F. (2004) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444904011679 · Cited by 4,815 · see citing works
Pao, W., Miller, V., Zakowski, M., Doherty, J., Politi, K., Sarkaria, I., Singh, B., Heelan, R., Rusch, V., Fulton, L., et al. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0405220101 · Cited by 4,338 · see citing works
Mitsudomi, T., Morita, S., Yatabe, Y., Negoro, S., Okamoto, I., Tsurutani, J., Seto, T., Satouchi, M., Tada, H., Hirashima, T., et al. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70364-x · Cited by 4,090 · see citing works
Zhou, C., Wu, Y.-L., Chen, G., Feng, J., Liu, X.-Q., Wang, C., Zhang, S., Wang, J., Zhou, S., Ren, S., et al. (2011) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70184-x · Cited by 4,081 · see citing works
<i>EGFR</i> Mutation and Resistance of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer to Gefitinib
Kobayashi, S., Boggon, T. J., Dayaram, T., Jänne, P. A., Kocher, O., Meyerson, M., Johnson, B. E., Eck, M. J., Tenen, D. G., & Halmos, B. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa044238 · Cited by 3,964 · see citing works
Self-citationSequist, L. V., Yang, J. C.-H., Yamamoto, N., O'Byrne, K., Hirsh, V., Mok, T., Geater, S. L., Orlov, S., Tsai, C.-M., Boyer, M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.44.2806 · Cited by 3,228 · see citing works
Self-citationEpidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer
Sharma, S. V., Bell, D. W., Settleman, J., & Haber, D. A. (2007) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2088 · Cited by 3,170 · see citing works
Shigematsu, H., Lin, L., Takahashi, T., Nomura, M., Suzuki, M., Wistuba, I. I., Fong, K. M., Lee, H., Toyooka, S., Shimizu, N., et al. (2005) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/dji055 · Cited by 2,377 · see citing works
Screening for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Lung Cancer
Rosell, R., Moran, T., Queralt, C., Porta, R., Cardenal, F., Camps, C., Majem, M., Lopez-Vivanco, G., Isla, D., Provencio, M., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0904554 · Cited by 2,373 · see citing works
The T790M mutation in EGFR kinase causes drug resistance by increasing the affinity for ATP
Yun, C.-H., Mengwasser, K. E., Toms, A. V., Woo, M. S., Greulich, H., Wong, K.-K., Meyerson, M., & Eck, M. J. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0709662105 · Cited by 2,118 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The EGFR-T790M mutation confers resistance by reversing the sensitization conferred by primary activating mutations, but it does so by altering the gatekeeper residue in the ATP site that is an important determinant of inhibitor specificity (50, 57).”
BackgroundSelf-citationAn allosteric mechanism for activation of the kinase domain of epidermal growth factor receptor
Zhang, X., Gureasko, J., Shen, K., Cole, P. A., & Kuriyan, J. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.013 · Cited by 1,650 · see citing works
Eberhard, D. A., Johnson, B. E., Amler, L. C., Goddard, A. D., Heldens, S., Herbst, R. S., Ince, W. L., Janne, P. A., Januario, T., Johnson, D. H., et al. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.02.857 · Cited by 1,453 · see citing works
BIBW2992, an irreversible EGFR/HER2 inhibitor highly effective in preclinical lung cancer models
Li, D., Ambrogio, L., Shimamura, T., Kubo, S., Takahashi, M., Chirieac, L. R., Padera, R. F., Shapiro, G. I., Baum, A., Himmelsbach, F., et al. (2008) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2008.109 · Cited by 1,447 · see citing works
Self-citationYun, C.-H., Boggon, T. J., Li, Y., Woo, M. S., Greulich, H., Meyerson, M., & Eck, M. J. (2007) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2006.12.017 · Cited by 1,192 · see citing works
Self-citationEML4-ALK Mutations in Lung Cancer That Confer Resistance to ALK Inhibitors
Choi, Y. L., Soda, M., Yamashita, Y., Ueno, T., Takashima, J., Nakajima, T., Yatabe, Y., Takeuchi, K., Hamada, T., Haruta, H., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1007478 · Cited by 1,186 · see citing works
Characterizing the cancer genome in lung adenocarcinoma
Weir, B. A., Woo, M. S., Getz, G., Perner, S., Ding, L., Beroukhim, R., Lin, W. M., Province, M. A., Kraja, A., Johnson, L. A., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06358 · Cited by 1,105 · see citing works
Self-citationRational, biologically based treatment of EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer
Pao, W., & Chmielecki, J. (2010) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2947 · Cited by 1,083 · see citing works
Novel mutant-selective EGFR kinase inhibitors against EGFR T790M
Zhou, W., Ercan, D., Chen, L., Yun, C.-H., Li, D., Capelletti, M., Cortot, A. B., Chirieac, L., Iacob, R. E., Padera, R., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08622 · Cited by 1,013 · see citing works
Self-citationHidalgo, M., Siu, L. L., Nemunaitis, J., Rizzo, J., Hammond, L. A., Takimoto, C., Eckhardt, S. G., Tolcher, A., Britten, C. D., Denis, L., et al. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2001.19.13.3267 · Cited by 1,001 · see citing works
High-throughput oncogene mutation profiling in human cancer
Thomas, R. K., Baker, A. C., Debiasi, R. M., Winckler, W., LaFramboise, T., Lin, W. M., Wang, M., Feng, W., Zander, T., MacConaill, L. E., et al. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1975 · Cited by 978 · see citing works
Self-citationBaselga, J., Rischin, D., Ranson, M., Calvert, H., Raymond, E., Kieback, D. G., Kaye, S. B., Gianni, L., Harris, A., Bjork, T., et al. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2002.03.100 · Cited by 829 · see citing works
Sequist, L. V., Martins, R. G., Spigel, D., Grunberg, S. M., Spira, A., Jänne, P. A., Joshi, V. A., McCollum, D., Evans, T. L., Muzikansky, A., et al. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.14.8494 · Cited by 820 · see citing works
Self-citationEngelman, J. A., Zejnullahu, K., Gale, C.-M., Lifshits, E., Gonzales, A. J., Shimamura, T., Zhao, F., Vincent, P. W., Naumov, G. N., Bradner, J. E., et al. (2007) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-1885 · Cited by 730 · see citing works
Self-citationWalter, A. O., Sjin, R. T. T., Haringsma, H. J., Ohashi, K., Sun, J., Lee, K., Dubrovskiy, A., Labenski, M., Zhu, Z., Wang, Z., et al. (2013) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-13-0314 · Cited by 620 · see citing works
Sequist, L. V. D., Bell, D. W., Lynch, T. J., & Haber, D. A. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.07.3585 · Cited by 617 · see citing works
Self-citationYasuda, H., Kobayashi, S., & Costa, D. B. (2012) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70129-2 · Cited by 610 · see citing works
Self-citationMitsudomi, T., & Yatabe, Y. (2007) · Cancer Science · doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00607.x · Cited by 606 · see citing works
Epidermal growth factor receptor in relation to tumor development: EGFR gene and cancer
Mitsudomi, T., & Yatabe, Y. (2009) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07448.x · Cited by 560 · see citing works
Costa, D. B., Halmos, B., Kumar, A., Schumer, S., Huberman, M. S., Boggon, T. J., Tenen, D. G., & Kobayashi, S. S. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040315 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Self-citationTokumo, M., Toyooka, S., Kiura, K., Shigematsu, H., Tomii, K., Aoe, M., Ichimura, K., Tsuda, T., Yano, M., Tsukuda, K., et al. (2005) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.1167.11.3 · Cited by 489 · see citing works
Politi, K., Zakowski, M. F., Fan, P.-D., Schonfeld, E. A., Pao, W., & Varmus, H. E. (2006) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1417406 · Cited by 478 · see citing works
Arcila, M. E., Nafa, K., Chaft, J. E., Rekhtman, N., Lau, C., Reva, B. A., Zakowski, M. F., Kris, M. G., & Ladanyi, M. (2013) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-12-0620 · Cited by 473 · see citing works
Self-citationWu, J.-Y., Yu, C.-J., Chang, Y.-C., Yang, C.-H., Shih, J.-Y., & Yang, P.-C. (2011) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-3408 · Cited by 463 · see citing works
Ji, H., Li, D., Chen, L., Shimamura, T., Kobayashi, S., McNamara, K., Mahmood, U., Mitchell, A., Sun, Y., Al-Hashem, R., et al. (2006) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2006.04.022 · Cited by 462 · see citing works
Self-citationCarey, K. D., Garton, A. J., Romero, M. S., Kahler, J., Thomson, S., Ross, S., Park, F., Haley, J. D., Gibson, N., & Sliwkowski, M. X. (2006) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-0453 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Nguyen, K.-S. H., Kobayashi, S., & Costa, D. B. (2009) · Clinical Lung Cancer · doi:10.3816/clc.2009.n.039 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Self-citationSequist, L. V. D., Besse, B., Lynch, T. J., Miller, V. A., Wong, K., Gitlitz, B. J., Eaton, K. D., Zacharchuk, C., Freyman, A., Powell, C., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.27.9414 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
Self-citationSequist, L. V. D., von Pawel, J., Garmey, E. G., Akerley, W., Brugger, W., Ferrari, D., Chen, Y., Costa, D. B., Gerber, D. E., Орлов, С. В., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2010.34.0570 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Self-citationNatural History and Molecular Characteristics of Lung Cancers Harboring EGFR Exon 20 Insertions
Oxnard, G. R., Lo, P. C., Nishino, M., Dahlberg, S. E., Lindeman, N. I., Butaney, M., Jackman, D. M., Johnson, B. E., & Jänne, P. A. (2013) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1097/jto.0b013e3182779d18 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Self-citationUpdate on Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Riely, G. J., Politi, K. A., Miller, V. A., & Pao, W. J. (2006) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-0658 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Self-citationYap, T. A., Vidal, L., Adam, J., Stephens, P., Spicer, J., Shaw, H., Ang, J., Temple, G., Bell, S., Shahidi, M., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.26.7278 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Cragg, M. S., Kuroda, J., Puthalakath, H., Huang, D. C. S., & Strasser, A. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040316 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Structural analysis of the catalytically inactive kinase domain of the human EGF receptor 3
Jura, N., Shan, Y., Cao, X., Shaw, D. E., & Kuriyan, J. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0912101106 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Gong, Y., Somwar, R., Politi, K. A., Balak, M. N., Chmielecki, J., Jiang, X., & Pao, W. J. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040294 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Wu, J.-Y., Wu, S.-G., Yang, C.-H., Gow, C.-H., Chang, Y.-L., Yu, C.-J., Shih, J.-Y., & Yang, P.-C. (2008) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-5123 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Kobayashi, S., Ji, H., Yuza, Y., Meyerson, M., Wong, K.-K., Tenen, D. G., & Halmos, B. (2005) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-1346 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Self-citationSomatic EGFR mutations and efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in NSCLC
Linardou, H., Dahabreh, I. J., Bafaloukos, D. I., Kosmidis, P., & Murray, S. J. (2009) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.62 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Eck, M. J., & Yun, C.-H. (2010) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2009.12.010 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Self-citationMulloy, R., Ferrand, A., Kim, Y., Sordella, R., Bell, D. W., Haber, D. A., Anderson, K. S., & Settleman, J. (2007) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-4293 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Effects of Erlotinib in <i>EGFR</i> Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers with Resistance to Gefitinib
Costa, D. B., Nguyen, K.-S. H., Cho, B. C., Sequist, L. V., Jackman, D. M., Riely, G. J., Yeap, B. Y., Halmos, B., Kim, J. H., Jänne, P. A., et al. (2008) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-1455 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Self-citationCosta, D. B., Kobayashi, S., Tenen, D. G., & Huberman, M. S. (2007) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.05.017 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Self-citationDeng, J., Shimamura, T., Perera, S. A., Carlson, N. E., Cai, D. D., Shapiro, G. I., Wong, K., & Letai, A. G. (2007) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-1961 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Murray, S. J., Dahabreh, I. J., Linardou, H., Manoloukos, M., Bafaloukos, D. I., & Kosmidis, P. (2008) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1097/jto.0b013e31818071f3 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
He, M., Capelletti, M., Nafa, K., Yun, C.-H., Arcila, M. E., Miller, V. A., Ginsberg, M. S., Zhao, B., Kris, M. G., Eck, M. J., et al. (2012) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-2361 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Self-citationCho, J., Chen, L., Sangji, N., Okabe, T., Yonesaka, K., Francis, J. M., Flavin, R. J., Johnson, W., Kwon, J., Yu, S., et al. (2013) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-13-1145 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Self-citationMinami, Y., Shimamura, T., Shah, K., LaFramboise, T., Glatt, K. A., Liniker, E., Borgman, C. L., Haringsma, H. J., Feng, W. W., Weir, B. A., et al. (2007) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1210292 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Self-citationYeh, P. G., Chen, H., Andrews, J., Naser, R., Pao, W. J., & Horn, L. (2013) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-1894 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Noncovalent Wild-type–Sparing Inhibitors of EGFR T790M
Lee, H.-J., Schaefer, G., Heffron, T. P., Shao, L., Ye, X., Sideris, S., Malek, S., Chan, E., Merchant, M., La, H., et al. (2013) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-12-0357 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation in Japanese lung cancer
Sasaki, H., Endo, K., Takada, M., Kawahara, M., Kitahara, N., Tanaka, H., Okumura, M., Matsumura, A., Iuchi, K., Kawaguchi, T., et al. (2007) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.06.024 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Erlotinib at a Dose of 25 mg Daily for Non-small Cell Lung Cancers with EGFR Mutations
Yeo, W.-L., Riely, G. J., Yeap, B. Y., Lau, M. W., Warner, J. L., Bodio, K., Huberman, M. S., Kris, M. G., Tenen, D. G., Pao, W. J., et al. (2010) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1097/jto.0b013e3181dd1386 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationThe partition method for poset-free families
Griggs, J. R., & Li, W. (2012) · Journal of Combinatorial Optimization · doi:10.1007/s10878-012-9476-9 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Harada, T., López-Chávez, A., Xi, L., Raffeld, M. A., Wang, Y., & Giaccone, G. (2010) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2010.545 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
OncoKB: A Precision Oncology Knowledge Base
Chakravarty, D., Gao, J., Phillips, S. M., Kundra, R., Zhang, H., Wang, J., Rudolph, J. E., Yaeger, R. D., Soumerai, T. E., Nissan, M. H., et al. (2017) · JCO Precision Oncology · doi:10.1200/po.17.00011 · Cited by 2,735 · see citing works
Self-citationThai, A. A., Solomon, B., Sequist, L. V. D., Gainor, J. F., & Heist, R. S. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00312-3 · Cited by 2,629 · see citing works
Self-citationEpidermal Growth Factor Receptor Cell Proliferation Signaling Pathways
Wee, P., & Wang, Z. (2017) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers9050052 · Cited by 2,027 · see citing works
ERBB Receptors: From Oncogene Discovery to Basic Science to Mechanism-Based Cancer Therapeutics
Arteaga, C. L., & Engelman, J. A. (2014) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2014.02.025 · Cited by 1,048 · see citing works
Yang, J. C.-H., Sequist, L. V., Geater, S. L., Tsai, C.-M., Mok, T. S. K., Schuler, M., Yamamoto, N., Yu, C.-J., Ou, S.-H. I., Zhou, C., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00026-1 · Cited by 1,002 · see citing works
Self-citationUnderstanding and targeting resistance mechanisms in NSCLC
Rotow, J. K., & Bivona, T. G. (2017) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2017.84 · Cited by 978 · see citing works
HER kinase inhibition in patients with HER2- and HER3-mutant cancers
Hyman, D. M., Piha-Paul, S. A., Won, H., Rodon, J., Saura, C., Shapiro, G. I., Juric, D., Quinn, D. I., Moreno, V., Doger, B., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25475 · Cited by 780 · see citing works
Cell death-based treatment of lung adenocarcinoma
Denisenko, T. V., Budkevich, I. N., & Zhivotovsky, B. (2018) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-017-0063-y · Cited by 768 · see citing works
Mechanisms of acquired resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors
Westover, D., Zugazagoitia, J., Cho, B. C., Lovly, C. M., & Paz-Ares, L. (2018) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx703 · Cited by 766 · see citing works
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 4.2016
Ettinger, D. S., Wood, D. E., Akerley, W., Bazhenova, L. A., Borghaei, H., Camidge, D. R., Cheney, R. T., Chirieac, L. R., D’Amico, T. A., Dilling, T. J., et al. (2016) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2016.0031 · Cited by 742 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Advantages of Targeted Protein Degradation Over Inhibition: An RTK Case Study
Burslem, G. M., Smith, B. E., Lai, A. C., Jaime-Figueroa, S., McQuaid, D. C., Bondeson, D. P., Toure, M., Dong, H., Qian, Y., Wang, J., et al. (2018) · Cell Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.09.009 · Cited by 686 · see citing works
Park, K., Haura, E. B., Leighl, N. B., Mitchell, P., Shu, C. A., Girard, N., Viteri, S., Han, J., Kim, S., Lee, C. K., et al. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.21.00662 · Cited by 665 · see citing works
Rare epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer
Harrison, P. T., Vyse, S., & Huang, P. H. (2019) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.09.015 · Cited by 625 · see citing works
EGFR in Cancer: Signaling Mechanisms, Drugs, and Acquired Resistance
Uribe, M. L., Marrocco, I., & Yarden, Y. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13112748 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
Structure-based classification predicts drug response in EGFR-mutant NSCLC
Robichaux, J. P., Le, X., Vijayan, R. S. K., Hicks, J. K., Heeke, S., Elamin, Y. Y., Lin, H. Y., Udagawa, H., Skoulidis, F., Tran, H., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03898-1 · Cited by 490 · see citing works
Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 6.2015
Ettinger, D. S., Wood, D. E., Akerley, W., Bazhenova, L. A., Borghaei, H., Camidge, D. R., Cheney, R. T., Chirieac, L. R., D’Amico, T. A., Demmy, T. L., et al. (2015) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2015.0071 · Cited by 478 · see citing works
Self-citationRobichaux, J. P., Elamin, Y. Y., Tan, Z., Carter, B. W., Zhang, S., Liu, S., Li, S., Chen, T., Poteete, A., Estrada-Bernal, A., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0007-9 · Cited by 468 · see citing works
Challenges and Opportunities in Cancer Drug Resistance
Ward, R. A., Fawell, S. E., Floc’h, N., Flemington, V., McKerrecher, D., & Smith, P. D. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00383 · Cited by 454 · see citing works
Institutional implementation of clinical tumor profiling on an unselected cancer population
Sholl, L. M., Do, K., Shivdasani, P., Cerami, E., Dubuc, A. M., Kuo, F. C., Garcia, E. P., Jia, Y., Davineni, P., Abo, R. P., et al. (2016) · JCI Insight · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.87062 · Cited by 450 · see citing works
Self-citationKobayashi, Y., & Mitsudomi, T. (2016) · Cancer Science · doi:10.1111/cas.12996 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Treatment approaches for EGFR-inhibitor-resistant patients with non-small-cell lung cancer
Tan, C., Gilligan, D., & Pacey, S. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00246-6 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
Targeting EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in non-small cell lung cancer
Vyse, S., & Huang, P. H. (2019) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-019-0038-9 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
EGFR signaling pathway as therapeutic target in human cancers
Levantini, E., Maroni, G., Re, M. D., & Tenen, D. G. (2022) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.04.002 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Castellanos, E. H., Feld, E., & Horn, L. (2016) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2016.12.014 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Stewart, E., Tan, S. Z., Liu, G., & Tsao, M. (2015) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · doi:10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2014.11.06 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Yun, J., Lee, S.-H., Kim, S.-Y., Jeong, S.-Y., Kim, J.-H., Pyo, K.-H., Park, C.-W., Heo, S. G., Yun, M. R., Lim, S., et al. (2020) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-0116 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Kidney Cancer, Version 2.2020
Motzer, R. J., Jonasch, E., Michaelson, M. D., Nandagopal, L., Gore, J. L., George, S., Alva, A., Haas, N., Harrison, M. R., Plimack, E. R., et al. (2019) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2019.0054 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Riess, J. W., Gandara, D. R., Frampton, G. M., Madison, R., Peled, N., Bufill, J. A., Dy, G. K., Ou, S.-H. I., Stephens, P. J., McPherson, J. D., et al. (2018) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2018.06.019 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Resisting Resistance: Targeted Therapies in Lung Cancer
Lin, J. J., & Shaw, A. T. (2016) · Trends in cancer · doi:10.1016/j.trecan.2016.05.010 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Riely, G. J., Neal, J. W., Camidge, D. R., Spira, A. I., Piotrowska, Z., Costa, D. B., Tsao, A. S., Patel, J. D., Gadgeel, S. M., Bazhenova, L. A., et al. (2021) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-1598 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Self-citationMolecular pathways and therapeutic targets in lung cancer
Shtivelman, E., Hensing, T., Simon, G. R., Dennis, P. A., Otterson, G. A., Bueno, R., & Salgia, R. (2014) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.1891 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Naidoo, J., Sima, C. S., Rodriguez, K., Busby, N., Nafa, K., Ladanyi, M., Riely, G. J., Kris, M. G., Arcila, M. E., & Yu, H. A. (2015) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.29493 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Self-citationKohsaka, S., Nagano, M., Ueno, T., Suehara, Y., Hayashi, T., Shimada, N., Takahashi, K., Suzuki, K., Takamochi, K., Takahashi, F., et al. (2017) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aan6566 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Dong, R., Zhu, M., Liu, M., Xu, Y., Yuan, L.-L., Bian, J., Xia, Y., & Kong, L. (2021) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105583 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Rethink of EGFR in Cancer With Its Kinase Independent Function on Board
Thomas, R., & Weihua, Z. (2019) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2019.00800 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Kobayashi, Y., Togashi, Y., Yatabe, Y., Mizuuchi, H., Jangchul, P., Kondo, C., Shimoji, M., Sato, K., Suda, K., Tomizawa, K., et al. (2015) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-1046 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertions in solid tumours: from biology to treatment
Friedlaender, A., Subbiah, V., Russo, A., Banna, G. L., Malapelle, U., Rolfo, C. D., & Addeo, A. (2021) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-021-00558-1 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Wu, Q., Qian, W., Sun, X., & Jiang, S. (2022) · Journal of Hematology & Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13045-022-01362-9 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Tan, D. S. W., Yom, S. S., Tsao, M. S., Pass, H. I., Kelly, K., Peled, N., Yung, R. C., Wistuba, I. I., Yatabe, Y., Unger, M., et al. (2016) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2016.05.008 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Santoni‐Rugiu, E., Melchior, L. C., Urbanska, E. M., Jakobsen, J. N., de Stricker, K., Grauslund, M., & Sørensen, J. B. (2019) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers11070923 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Gonzalvez, F., Vincent, S., Baker, T. E., Gould, A. E., Li, S., Wardwell, S. D., Nadworny, S., Ning, Y., Zhang, S., Huang, W.-S., et al. (2021) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-1683 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
VanderLaan, P. A., Rangachari, D., Mockus, S. M., Spotlow, V., Reddi, H. V., Malcolm, J., Huberman, M. S., Joseph, L. J., Kobayashi, S. S., & Costa, D. B. (2017) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.01.011 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Self-citationA comprehensive review of uncommon EGFR mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer
Tu, H.-Y., Ke, E.-E., Yang, J.-J., Sun, Y.-L., Yan, H.-H., Zheng, M.-Y., Bai, X.-Y., Wang, Z., Su, J., Chen, Z.-H., et al. (2017) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.11.005 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Nukaga, S., Yasuda, H., Tsuchihara, K., Hamamoto, J., Masuzawa, K., Kawada, I., Naoki, K., Matsumoto, S., Mimaki, S., Ikemura, S., et al. (2017) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-2359 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Self-citationRusso, A., Franchina, T., Rita Ricciardi, G. R., Picone, A., Ferraro, G., Zanghì, M., Toscano, G., Giordano, A., & Adamo, V. (2015) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.4254 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Hirano, T., Yasuda, H., Tani, T., Hamamoto, J., Oashi, A., Ishioka, K., Arai, D., Nukaga, S., Miyawaki, M., Kawada, I., et al. (2015) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.5887 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Self-citationMolecular mechanisms of resistance in epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant lung adenocarcinomas
Cortot, A. B., & Jänne, P. A. (2014) · European Respiratory Review · doi:10.1183/09059180.00004614 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Treatment of uncommon EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: new evidence and treatment
Zhang, T., Wan, B., Zhao, Y., Li, C., Liu, H., Lv, T., Zhan, P., & Song, Y. (2019) · Translational Lung Cancer Research · doi:10.21037/tlcr.2019.04.12 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Shea, M., Costa, D. B., & Rangachari, D. (2015) · Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1177/1753465815617871 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Self-citationEmerging therapies for non-small cell lung cancer
Zhang, C., Leighl, N. B., Wu, Y.-L. L. C., & Zhong, W. (2019) · Journal of Hematology & Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13045-019-0731-8 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Uncommon EGFR mutations in advanced non-small cell lung cancer
O'Kane, G. M., Bradbury, P. A., Feld, R. D., Leighl, N. B., Liu, G., Pisters, K.-M., Kamel‐Reid, S., Tsao, M., & Shepherd, F. A. (2017) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.04.016 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Molecular-Targeted Therapies for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and Its Resistance Mechanisms
Yamaoka, T., Ohba, M., & Ohmori, T. (2017) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms18112420 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Dietel, M., Jöhrens, K., von Laffert, M., Hummel, M., Bläker, H., Pfitzner, B. M., Lehmann, A., Denkert, C., Darb‐Esfahani, S., Lenze, D., et al. (2015) · Cancer Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/cgt.2015.39 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Lee, K. H. (2017) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.02.001 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Fassunke, J., Müller, F., Keul, M., Michels, S. Y. F., Dammert, M. A., Schmitt, A., Plenker, D., Lategahn, J., Heydt, C., Brägelmann, J., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07078-0 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Patterson, S. E., Liu, R., Statz, C. M., Durkin, D., Lakshminarayana, A., & Mockus, S. M. (2016) · Human Genomics · doi:10.1186/s40246-016-0061-7 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Wang, M., Yang, J. C.-H., Mitchell, P. L., Fang, J., Camidge, D. R., Nian, W., Chiu, C.-H., Zhou, J., Zhao, Y., Su, W.-C., et al. (2022) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-1615 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Response Heterogeneity of EGFR and HER2 Exon 20 Insertions to Covalent EGFR and HER2 Inhibitors
Kosaka, T., Tanizaki, J., Paranal, R. M., Endoh, H., Lydon, C., Capelletti, M., Repellin, C. E., Choi, J., Ogino, A., Calles, A., et al. (2017) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-3404 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Self-citationTargeting non-small cell lung cancer with small-molecule EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors
Singh, M., & Jadhav, H. R. (2017) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2017.10.004 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Genomic alterations of ERBB receptors in cancer: clinical implications
Mishra, R., Hanker, A. B., & Garrett, J. T. (2017) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.22825 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Rangachari, D., VanderLaan, P. A., Shea, M., Le, X., Huberman, M. S., Kobayashi, S. S., & Costa, D. B. (2017) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2016.12.026 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Self-citationEGFR exon 20 insertions in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A new history begins
Remón, J., Hendriks, L. E. L., Cardona, A. F., & Besse, B. (2020) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102105 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in lung cancer: preclinical and clinical data
Jorge, S. E., Kobayashi, S. S., & Costa, D. B. (2014) · Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research · doi:10.1590/1414-431x20144099 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Self-citationGristina, V., Malapelle, U., Galvano, A., Pisapia, P., Pepe, F., Rolfo, C. D., Tortorici, S., Bazan, V., Troncone, G., & Russo, A. D. (2020) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.101994 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Jia, Y., Juarez, J., Li, J., Manuia, M., Niederst, M. J., Tompkins, C., Timple, N., Vaillancourt, M.-T., Pferdekamper, A. C., Lockerman, E. L., et al. (2016) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-15-2581 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations and response to osimertinib in non-small-cell lung cancer
Fang, W., Huang, Y., Hong, S., Zhang, Z., Wang, M., Gan, J., Wang, W., Guo, H., Wang, K., & Zhang, L. (2019) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-019-5820-0 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Molecular Mechanisms and Targeted Therapies Including Immunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Nagano, T., TACHIHARA, M. Y., & Nishimura, Y. (2018) · Current Cancer Drug Targets · doi:10.2174/1568009619666181210114559 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Kim, E. Y., Cho, E. N., Park, H. S., Hong, J. Y., Lim, S., Youn, J. P., Hwang, S. Y., & Chang, Y. S. (2016) · Cancer Biology & Therapy · doi:10.1080/15384047.2016.1139235 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Floc'h, N., Martin, M. J., Riess, J. W., Orme, J. P., Staniszewska, A. D., Ménard, L., Cuomo, M. E., O'Neill, D. J., Ward, R. A., Finlay, M. R. V., et al. (2018) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-17-0758 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Identification of Recurrent FGFR3–TACC3 Fusion Oncogenes from Lung Adenocarcinoma
Capelletti, M., Dodge, M. E., Ercan, D., Hammerman, P. S., Park, S.-I., Kim, J., Sasaki, H., Jablons, D. M., Lipson, D., Young, L., et al. (2014) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-1337 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
König, D., Prince, S. S., & Rothschild, S. I. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13040804 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Yang, G., Li, J., Xu, H., Yang, Y., Yang, L., Xu, F., Xia, B., Zhu, V. W., Nagasaka, M., Yang, Y., et al. (2020) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.03.014 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Targeting HER2 Aberrations in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer with Osimertinib
Liu, S., Li, S., Hai, J., Wang, X., Chen, T., Quinn, M. M., Gao, P., Zhang, Y., Ji, H., Cross, D. A. E., et al. (2018) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-1875 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Russo, A., Franchina, T., Ricciardi, G., Battaglia, A., Picciotto, M., & Adamo, V. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20061431 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Elamin, Y. Y., Robichaux, J. P., Carter, B. W., Altan, M., Tran, H. T., Gibbons, D. L., Heeke, S., Fossella, F. V., Lam, V. K. L., Le, X., et al. (2022) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2022.06.006 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Reita, D., Pabst, L., Pencreach, E., Guérin, É., Dano, L., Rimelen, V., Voegeli, A., Vallat, L. D., Mascaux, C., & Beau‐Faller, M. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13194926 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Meador, C. B., Sequist, L. V. D., & Piotrowska, Z. (2021) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-0226 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Self-citation20 years since the approval of first EGFR-TKI, gefitinib: Insight and foresight
Singh, S. K., Sadhukhan, S., & Sonawane, A. (2023) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2023.188967 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Shen, Y.-C., Tseng, G.-C., Tu, C.-Y., Chen, W.-C., Liao, W.-C., Chen, W.-C., Li, C.-H., Chen, H.-J., & Hsia, T.-C. (2017) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.06.007 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Rangachari, D., To, C., Shpilsky, J. E., VanderLaan, P. A., Kobayashi, S. S., Mushajiang, M., Lau, C. J., Paweletz, C. P., Oxnard, G. R., Janne, P. A., et al. (2019) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2019.07.016 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citationOsimertinib treatment for patients with EGFR exon 20 mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer
van Veggel, B. A. M. H., Vilachã, J. F., Hashemi, S. M. S., Paats, M. S., Monkhorst, K., Heideman, D. A. M., Groves, M. R., Radonic, T. R., Smit, E. F., Schuuring, E. M. D., et al. (2019) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.12.013 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Mondal, G., Lee, J. C., Ravindranathan, A., Villanueva-Meyer, J. E., Tran, Q. T., Allen, S. J., Barreto, J., Gupta, R. K., Doo, P., Ziffle, J. V., et al. (2020) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-020-02155-5 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Choi, Y.-M., Lee, H., Ann, M., Song, M., Rheey, J., & Jang, J. (2023) · Biofabrication · doi:10.1088/1758-5090/acd95f · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Grünewald, S., Klug, L. R., Mühlenberg, T., Lategahn, J., Falkenhorst, J., Town, A., Ehrt, C., Wardelmann, E., Hartmann, W., Schildhaus, H., et al. (2020) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-0487 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
β-Catenin Contributes to Lung Tumor Development Induced by EGFR Mutations
Nakayama, S., Sng, N., Carretero, J., Welner, R. S., Hayashi, Y., Yamamoto, M., Tan, A. J., Yamaguchi, N., Yasuda, H., Li, D., et al. (2014) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-0184 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citationBurnett, H. F., Emich, H., Carroll, C., Stapleton, N., Mahadevia, P. J., & Li, T. M. W. Y. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0247620 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Prevalence and role of HER2 mutations in cancer
Cocco, E., Lopez, S., Santin, A. D., & Scaltriti, M. (2019) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.03.010 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
TAS6417, A Novel EGFR Inhibitor Targeting Exon 20 Insertion Mutations
Hasako, S., Terasaka, M., Abe, N., Uno, T., Ohsawa, H., Hashimoto, A., Fujita, R., Tanaka, K., Okayama, T., Wadhwa, R., et al. (2018) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-17-1206 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Management and Future Directions in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Known Activating Mutations
Gerber, D. E., Gandhi, L., & Costa, D. B. (2014) · American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book · doi:10.14694/edbook_am.2014.34.e353 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Self-citationBanno, E., Togashi, Y., Nakamura, Y., Chiba, M., Kobayashi, Y., Hayashi, H., Terashima, M., de Velasco, M. A., Sakai, K., Fujita, Y., et al. (2016) · Cancer Science · doi:10.1111/cas.12980 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Structure and mechanism of activity-based inhibition of the EGF receptor by Mig6
Park, E., Kim, N., Ficarro, S. B., Zhang, Y., Lee, B. I., Cho, A., Kim, K., Park, A. K.-J., Park, W., Murray, B. A., et al. (2015) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.3074 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citationEstrada‐Bernal, A., Le, A. T., Doak, A. E., Tirunagaru, V. G., Silva, S., Bull, M. R., Smaill, J. B., Patterson, A. V., Kim, C., Liu, S. V., et al. (2020) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-3555 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Bazhenova, L. A., Minchom, A. R., Viteri, S., Bauml, J. M., Ou, S. I., Gadgeel, S. M., Trigo, J. M., Backenroth, D., Li, T. M. W. Y., Londhe, A., et al. (2021) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.10.020 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Jorge, S. E., Schulman, S., Freed, J. A., VanderLaan, P. A., Rangachari, D., Kobayashi, S. S., Huberman, M. S., & Costa, D. B. (2015) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.10.028 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationVasconcelos, P. E. N. S., Gergis, C., Viray, H., Varkaris, A. S., Fujii, M., Rangachari, D., VanderLaan, P. A., Kobayashi, I. S., Kobayashi, S. S., & Costa, D. B. (2020) · JTO Clinical and Research Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jtocrr.2020.100051 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationJohn, T., Taylor, A., Wang, H., Eichinger, C. S., Freeman, C. S., & Ahn, M. (2021) · Cancer Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.canep.2021.102080 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Piotrowska, Z., Costa, D. B., Oxnard, G. R., Huberman, M., Gainor, J. F., Lennes, I. T., Muzikansky, A., Shaw, A. T., Azzoli, C. G., Heist, R. S., et al. (2018) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy336 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citationHeigener, D. F., Schumann, C., Sebastian, M., Sadjadian, P., Stehle, I., Märten, A., Lüers, A., Griesinger, F., Scheffler, M., & for the Afatinib Compassionate Use Consortium (ACUC) (2015) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0073 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Cheng, G., Song, Z., & Chen, D. (2016) · OncoTargets and Therapy · doi:10.2147/ott.s108242 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Udagawa, H., Hasako, S., Ohashi, A., Fujioka, R., Hakozaki, Y., Shibuya, M., Abe, N., Komori, T., Haruma, T., Terasaka, M., et al. (2019) · Molecular Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-19-0419 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Yasuda, H., Park, E., Yun, C.-H., Sng, N. J., Lucena-Araujo, A. R., Yeo, W.-L., Huberman, M. S., Cohen, D. W., Nakayama, S., Ishioka, K., Yamaguchi, N., Hanna, M., Oxnard, G. R., Lathan, C. S., Moran, T., Sequist, L. V., Chaft, J. E., Riely, G. J., Arcila, M. E., Soo, R. A., Meyerson, M., Eck, M. J., Kobayashi, S. S., & Costa, D. B.
- Affiliations
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Peking University (CN)
- Keio University (JP)
- Broad Institute (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Yasuda, Hiroyuki
- Park, Eunyoung
- Yun, Cai-Hong
- Cohen, David W.
- Eck, Michael J.
- Kobayashi, Susumu S.
- Costa, Daniel B.
- ORCID
- Yasuda, Hiroyuki
- Park, Eunyoung
- Yun, Cai-Hong
- Lucena-Araujo, Antonio R.
- Cohen, David W.
- Nakayama, Sohei
- Ishioka, Kota
- Yamaguchi, Norihiro
- Oxnard, Geoffrey R.
- Lathan, Christopher S.
- Sequist, Lecia V.
- Chaft, Jamie E.
- Riely, Gregory J.
- Arcila, Maria E.
- Soo, Ross A.
- Meyerson, Matthew
- Eck, Michael J.
- Kobayashi, Susumu S.
- Costa, Daniel B.
- Venue
- Science Translational Medicine
- Published
- 2013-12-18
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 216
- Pages
- 216ra177-216ra177
- ISSN
- 1946-6234 (ISSN-L)
- 1946-6242
- PMC
- PMC3954775
- OpenAlex
- W2076883919
- Cited by
- 571
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 17
- FWCI
- 24.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Science Translational Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA116020, CA090578, R00CA126026, R01CA169259, CA 116020, P50CA090578, K99CA126026, P20CA090578, P01CA154303, CA154303, CA126026, CA169259)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- EGFR exon 20 insertion, non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, gefitinib, erlotinib, tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance, L858R mutation, ATP binding site, kinase conformation, crystal structure, targeted therapy
- MeSH terms
- Erlotinib Hydrochloride, Gefitinib, Amino Acid Sequence, Antineoplastic Agents, Base Sequence, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, DNA, Neoplasm, Exons, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Protein Conformation, Quinazolines, Mutagenesis, Insertional, Crystallography, X-Ray, Genes, erbB-1, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Structural Homology, Protein, Cell Line, Tumor, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Translational Research, Biomedical, ErbB Receptors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review