Cited by 889Pluripotent Stem Cells ResearchCancer Cells and MetastasisDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

The tumorigenicity of human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells

Ben-David, Uri, Benvenisty, Nissim·2011·Nature Reviews Cancer

Abstract

The unique abilities of human pluripotent stem cells to self-renew and to differentiate into cells of the three germ layers make them an invaluable tool for the future of regenerative medicine. However, the same properties also make them tumorigenic, and therefore hinder their clinical application. Hence, the tumorigenicity of human embryonic stem cells (HESCs) has been extensively studied. Until recently, it was assumed that human induced pluripotent stem cells (HiPSCs) would behave like their embryonic counterparts in respect to their tumorigenicity. However, a rapidly accumulating body of evidence suggests that there are important genetic and epigenetic differences between these two cell types, which seem to influence their tumorigenicity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrc3034

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ben-David, U., & Benvenisty, N.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Venue
Nature Reviews Cancer
Published
2011-03-10
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
268-277
ISSN
  • 1474-175X (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1768
OpenAlex
W1967467247
Cited by
889
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 67
FWCI
6.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
tumorigenicity, human embryonic stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, pluripotency, self-renewal, germ layer differentiation, genetic differences, epigenetic variation, clinical translation
MeSH terms
Cell Differentiation, Humans, Neoplasms, Regenerative Medicine, Embryonic Stem Cells, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Epigenomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review