The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Triple-negative breast cancer in African-American women: disparities versus biology
Open accessAbstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype that disproportionately affects BRCA1 mutation carriers and young women of African origin. There is evidence that African-American women with TNBC have worse clinical outcomes than women of European descent. However, it is unclear whether survival differences persist after adjusting for disparities in access to health-care treatment, co-morbid disease and income. It remains controversial whether TNBC in African-American women is a molecularly distinct disease or whether African-American women have a higher incidence of aggressive biology driven by disparities: there is evidence in support of both. Understanding the relative contributions of biology and disparities is essential for improving the poor survival rate of African-American women with TNBC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours
The Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11412 · Cited by 12,129
The extracellular matrix: A dynamic niche in cancer progression
Lu, P., Weaver, V. M., & Werb, Z. (2012) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201102147 · Cited by 3,024
Kleer, C. G., Cao, Q., Varambally, S., Shen, R., Ota, I., Tomlins, S. A., Ghosh, D., Sewalt, R. G. A. B., Otte, A. P., Hayes, D. F., et al. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1933744100 · Cited by 1,649
Yoshida, K., & Miki, Y. (2004) · Cancer Science · doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.2004.tb02195.x · Cited by 753
Triple-negative breast cancer: epidemiological considerations and recommendations
Boyle, P. (2012) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mds187 · Cited by 593
Cited by
Polak, P., Kim, J., Braunstein, L. Z., Karlic, R., Haradhavala, N. J., Tiao, G., Rosebrock, D., Livitz, D., Kübler, K., Mouw, K. W., et al. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3934 · Cited by 531
Social determinants of breast cancer risk, stage, and survival
Coughlin, S. S. (2019) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-019-05340-7 · Cited by 555
Telonis, A. G., Loher, P., Honda, S., Jing, Y., Palazzo, J., Kirino, Y., & Rigoutsos, I. (2015) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.4695 · Cited by 191
Metadata
- Authors
- Dietze, E. C., Sistrunk, C., Miranda-Carboni, G., O'Regan, R., & Seewaldt, V. L.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Cancer
- Published
- 2015-02-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 248-254
- ISSN
- 1474-175X (ISSN-L)
- 1474-1768
- OpenAlex
- W1966727713
- Cited by
- 898
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Triple-negative breast cancer in African-American women: disparities versus biology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nrc3896
- The paper
- Dietze, E. C., Sistrunk, C., Miranda-Carboni, G., O'Regan, R., & Seewaldt, V. L. (2015). Triple-negative breast cancer in African-American women: disparities versus biology. Nature Reviews Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3896
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
