The DOI matches its Crossref record; 173 of the 173 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spina bifida
Open accessAbstract
Spina bifida is a birth defect in which the vertebral column is open, often with spinal cord involvement. The most clinically significant subtype is myelomeningocele (open spina bifida), which is a condition characterized by failure of the lumbosacral spinal neural tube to close during embryonic development. The exposed neural tissue degenerates in utero, resulting in neurological deficit that varies with the level of the lesion. Occurring in approximately 1 per 1,000 births worldwide, myelomeningocele is one of the most common congenital malformations, but its cause is largely unknown. The genetic component is estimated at 60–70%, but few causative genes have been identified to date, despite much information from mouse models. Non-genetic maternal risk factors include reduced folate intake, anticonvulsant therapy, diabetes mellitus and obesity. Primary prevention by periconceptional supplementation with folic acid has been demonstrated in clinical trials, leading to food fortification programmes in many countries. Prenatal diagnosis is achieved by ultrasonography, enabling women to seek termination of pregnancy. Individuals who survive to birth have their lesions closed surgically, with subsequent management of associated defects, including the Chiari II brain malformation, hydrocephalus, and urological and orthopaedic sequelae. Fetal surgical repair of myelomeningocele has been associated with improved early neurological outcome compared with postnatal operation. Myelomeningocele affects quality of life during childhood, adolescence and adulthood, posing a challenge for individuals, families and society as a whole. For an illustrated summary of this Primer, visit: http://go.nature.com/fK9XNa
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prevention of neural tube defects: Results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study
(1991) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)90133-a · Cited by 3,472
Czeizel, A. E., & Dudás, I. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199212243272602 · Cited by 3,178
A Randomized Trial of Prenatal versus Postnatal Repair of Myelomeningocele
Adzick, N. S., Thom, E. A., Spong, C. Y., Brock, J. W., Burrows, P. K., Johnson, M. P., Howell, L. J., Farrell, J. A., Dabrowiak, M. E., Sutton, L. N., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1014379 · Cited by 2,249
Self-citationSneddon, J., Densem, J. W., Wald, N. J., Frost, C., Stone, R., & Gnant, M. (1991) · PubMed · Cited by 1,812
Phiel, C. J., Zhang, F., Huang, E. Y., Guenther, M. G., Lazar, M. A., & Klein, P. S. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m101287200 · Cited by 1,758
Personal omics profiling reveals dynamic molecular and medical phenotypes
Chen, R., Mias, G. I., Li-Pook-Than, J., Jiang, L., Lam, H. Y. K., Chen, R., Miriami, E., Karczewski, K. J., Hariharan, M., Dewey, F. E., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.009 · Cited by 1,291
Stothard, K. J., Tennant, P. W. G., Bell, R., & Rankin, J. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.113 · Cited by 1,270
Reduction in Neural-Tube Defects after Folic Acid Fortification in Canada
De Wals, P., Tairou, F., Van Allen, M. I., Uh, S.-H., Lowry, R. B., Sibbald, B., Evans, J. A., Van den Hof, M. C., Zimmer, P., Crowley, M., et al. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa067103 · Cited by 851
The genetic basis of mammalian neurulation
Copp, A. J., Greene, N. D. E., & Murdoch, J. N. (2003) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1181 · Cited by 697
Self-citationThe Prevalence of Congenital Anomalies in Europe
Dolk, H., Loane, M., & Garne, E. (2010) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9485-8_20 · Cited by 683
Cited by
One-Carbon Metabolism in Health and Disease
Ducker, G. S., & Rabinowitz, J. D. (2017) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2016.08.009 · Cited by 2,239
Green, R., Allen, L. H., Bjørke-Monsen, A.-L., Brito, A., Guéant, J.-L., Miller, J. W., Molloy, A. M., Nexo, E., Stabler, S., Toh, B.-H., et al. (2017) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.40 · Cited by 970
Mood-Stabilizing Anticonvulsants, Spina Bifida, and Folate Supplementation: Commentary
Patel, N., Viguera, A. C., & Baldessarini, R. J. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1097/jcp.0000000000000813 · Cited by 23
First Trimester Ultrasound Detection of Fetal Central Nervous System Anomalies
Ungureanu, D. R., Drăgușin, R. C., Căpitănescu, R. G., Zorilă, L., Ofițeru, A. M. I., Marinaș, C., Pătru, C. L., Comănescu, A. C., Comănescu, M. C., Sîrbu, O. C., et al. (2023) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci13010118 · Cited by 20
Cengizler, Ç., Ün, M. K., & Büyükkurt, S. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-66468-x · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Copp, A. J., Adzick, N. S., Chitty, L. S., Fletcher, J. M., Holmbeck, G. N., & Shaw, G. M.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Disease Primers
- Published
- 2015-04-30
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15007-15007
- ISSN
- 2056-676X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4210319618
- Cited by
- 649
- References
- 173
- FWCI
- 3.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spina bifida. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nrdp.2015.7
- The paper
- Copp, A. J., Adzick, N. S., Chitty, L. S., Fletcher, J. M., Holmbeck, G. N., & Shaw, G. M. (2015). Spina bifida. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.