Cited by 11Medical Imaging and AnalysisMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesSpinal Dysraphism and Malformations

A Nature-Inspired Search Space Reduction Technique for Spine Identification on Ultrasound Samples of Spina Bifida Cases

Open access
Cengizler, Çağlar, Ün, M. Kerem, Büyükkurt, Selim·2020·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Spina bifida is a birth defect caused by incomplete closing around the spinal cord. Spina bifida is diagnosed in a number of different ways. One approach involves searching for a deformity in the spinal axis via ultrasound. Although easy to apply, this approach requires a highly trained clinician to locate the abnormality due to the noise and distortion present in prenatal ultrasound images. Accordingly, visual examination of ultrasound images may be error prone and subjective. A computerized support system that would automatically detect the location of the spinal deformity may be helpful to the clinician in the diagnostic process. Such a software system first and foremost would require an algorithm for the identification of the entire (healthy or unhealthy) spine in the ultrasound image. This paper introduces a novel flocking dynamics based approach for reducing the size of the search space in the spine identification problem. Proposed approach accepts bone-like blobs on the ultrasound images as bird flocks and combine them into bone groups by calculating the migration path of each flock. Presented results reveal that the method is able to locate correct bones to be grouped together and reduce search space (i.e. number of bones) up to 68%.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-020-66468-x

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cengizler et al. proposed an algorithm for the identification of the fetal spine and proofed the model's performance in cases of fetuses with spina bifida.

    “Cengizler et al. proposed an algorithm for the identification of the fetal spine and proofed the model’s performance in cases of fetuses with spina bifida [141].”

    From Evolving the Era of 5D Ultrasound? A Systematic Literature Review on the Applications for Artificial Intelligence Ultrasound Imaging in Obstetrics and Gynecology (2023) · cites this paper as [141]

    The Methods section (page unavailable) says the proposed method was tested on ultrasound images of fourteen fetal spines diagnosed with spina bifida, and the Results evaluate its performance. But the Discussion and Conclusions describe it as a search-space reduction method for spine identification, not a complete spine-identification algorithm; the paper says that an appropriate fitness function would still be needed for that task. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [21]Bottaci, L. A genetic algorithm fitness function for mutation testing. In Proceedings of the SEMINALL-workshop at the 23rd international conference on software engineering, Toronto, Canada (2001).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cengizler, Ç., Ün, M. K., & Büyükkurt, S.
Affiliations
Cukurova University (TR)
Corresponding author
Cengizler, Çağlar
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2020-06-09
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
9280-9280
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3033922416
Cited by
11
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Keywords
spina bifida, prenatal ultrasound, search space reduction, flocking dynamics, automated diagnosis, bio-inspired algorithms
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Spinal Cord, Spina Bifida Cystica, Ultrasonography, Prenatal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review