Cited by 8Endometriosis Research and TreatmentMenstrual Health and DisordersEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Elagolix in endometriosis

Bradley, Conor A.·2017·Nature Reviews Endocrinology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrendo.2017.74

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bradley, C. A.
Corresponding author
Bradley, Conor A.
Venue
Nature Reviews Endocrinology
Published
2017-06-09
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
439-439
ISSN
  • 1759-5029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-5037
OpenAlex
W2626913383
Cited by
8
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
elagolix, endometriosis, endometriosis-associated pain, GnRH antagonist, pain management
MeSH terms
Endocrinology, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Hydrocarbons, Fluorinated, Pyrimidines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review