The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic relatedness analysis: modern data and new challenges
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genomic Control for Association Studies
Devlin, B., & Roeder, K. (1999) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00997.x · Cited by 3,162 · cited 1×
“It could be valuable to extend these analyses to the more detailed set of IBD measures to accommodate the background relatedness among people that are affected by diseases that have a genetic basi”
Background
Cited by
Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies
Kang, H. M., Sul, J. H., Service, S. K., Zaitlen, N. A., Kong, S.-Y., Freimer, N. B., Sabatti, C., & Eskin, E. (2010) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.548 · Cited by 2,817
Estimating genetic kin relationships in prehistoric populations
Monroy Kuhn, J. M., Jakobsson, M., & Günther, T. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0195491 · Cited by 330
Relatedness in the post-genomic era: is it still useful?
Speed, D., & Balding, D. J. (2015) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3821 · Cited by 316
Hanghøj, K., Moltke, I., Andersen, P. A., Manica, A., & Korneliussen, T. S. (2019) · GigaScience · doi:10.1093/gigascience/giz034 · Cited by 216
Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Biological Relatedness from Low Coverage Sequencing Data
Lipatov, M., Sanjeev, K., Patro, R., & Veeramah, K. R. (2015) · doi:10.1101/023374 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Weir, B. S., Anderson, A. D., & Hepler, A. B.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Genetics
- Published
- 2006-10-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 771-780
- ISSN
- 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-0064
- OpenAlex
- W2020937422
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic relatedness analysis: modern data and new challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nrg1960
- The paper
- Weir, B. S., Anderson, A. D., & Hepler, A. B. (2006). Genetic relatedness analysis: modern data and new challenges. Nature Reviews Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1960
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
