Cited by 216Genetic diversity and population structureGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

Fast and accurate relatedness estimation from high-throughput sequencing data in the presence of inbreeding

Open access
Hanghøj, Kristian, Moltke, Ida, Andersen, Philip Alstrup, Manica, Andrea, Korneliussen, Thorfinn Sand·2019·GigaScience

Abstract

Background: The estimation of relatedness between pairs of possibly inbred individuals from high-throughput sequencing (HTS) data has previously not been possible for samples where we cannot obtain reliable genotype calls, as in the case of low-coverage data. Results: We introduce ngsRelateV2, a major revision of ngsRelateV1, a program that originally allowed for estimation of relatedness from HTS data among non-inbred individuals only. The new revised version takes into account the possibility of individuals being inbred by estimating the 9 condensed Jacquard coefficients along with various other relatedness statistics. The program is threaded and scales linearly with the number of cores allocated to the process. Conclusion: The program is available as an open source C/C++ program under the GPL license and hosted at https://github.com/ANGSD/ngsRelate. To facilitate easy analysis, the program is able to work directly on the most commonly used container formats for raw sequence (BAM/CRAM) and summary data (VCF/BCF).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gigascience/giz034

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • No first- or second-degree relatives were found among the Ancient Rapanui, and a single pair of third- to fourth-degree relatives was detected.

    “Using READ42 and NGSrelate243, we did not find any first- or second-degree relatives among the Ancient Rapanui (Supplementary Figs. 23 and 24 and Supplementary Information section 9) and detected a single pair of third- to fourth-degree relatives on the basis of IBD sharing (highest estimated IBD sharing >15 cM between any two individuals is <1,000 cM; Supplementary Information section 8 and”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [22]Manichaikul A, Mychaleckyj JC, Rich SS, et al. Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26(22): 2867– 73. 20926424 PMC3025716
  2. [28]Hanghøj K, Moltke I, Andersen PA, et al. Supporting data for ”Fast and accurate relatedness estimation from high-throughput sequencing data in the presence of inbreeding”. GigaScience Database. 2019 10.5524/100562. PMC6488770 31042285 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanghøj, K., Moltke, I., Andersen, P. A., Manica, A., & Korneliussen, T. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Hanghøj, Kristian
  • Korneliussen, Thorfinn Sand
Venue
GigaScience
Published
2019-04-30
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
giz034
ISSN
2047-217X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2943389067
Cited by
216
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2
FWCI
7.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • GigaScience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • Danish National Research Foundation (DNRF94)
  • Initiative d'Excellence Chaires d'attractivité, Université de Toulouse
  • Carlsberg Foundation (CF16-0913)
  • Danish National Research Foundation Centre for GeoGenetics (DNRF 0094)
  • Lundbeck Foundation GeoGenetics Centre for Brain, Disease, & Evolution (R302-2018-2155)
  • Independent Research Fund Denmark (DFF - 4090-00244)
  • ERC Consolidator (647787)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Keywords
relatedness estimation, inbreeding, low-pass sequencing, genotype calls, high-throughput sequencing data
MeSH terms
Genetics, Population, Genotype, Humans, Inbreeding, Software, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Genotyping Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review