The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reuse of public genome-wide gene expression data
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository
Edgar, R. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/30.1.207 · Cited by 13,288
RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics
Wang, Z., Gerstein, M., & Snyder, M. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2484 · Cited by 13,174
The combination of estimates from different experiments
Cochran, W. G. (1954) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001666 · Cited by 5,380
A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes
Su, A. I., Wiltshire, T., Batalov, S., Lapp, H., Ching, K. A., Block, D., Zhang, J., Soden, R., Hayakawa, M., Kreiman, G., et al. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0400782101 · Cited by 3,475
arrayQualityMetrics—a bioconductor package for quality assessment of microarray data
Kauffmann, A., Gentleman, R., & Huber, W. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn647 · Cited by 946 · cited 1×
“This can be done by the Bioconductor ArrayQualityMetrics package 102 , for example.”
MethodRepeatability of published microarray gene expression analyses
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Allison, D. B., Ball, C. A., Coulibaly, I., Cui, X., Culhane, A. C., Falchi, M., Furlanello, C., Game, L., Jurman, G., et al. (2009) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.295 · Cited by 551
Toward interoperable bioscience data
Sansone, S.-A., Rocca-Serra, P., Field, D., Maguire, E., Taylor, C., Hofmann, O., Fang, H., Neumann, S., Tong, W., Amaral-Zettler, L., et al. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.1054 · Cited by 475 · cited 1×
“Thus, annotation and data management tools such as Annotare 54 , ISA-creator 55 and others 56 are likely to have a positive impact on data reusability and reproducibility of results.”
Method
Cited by
A roadmap for multi-omics data integration using deep learning
Kang, M., Ko, E., & Mersha, T. B. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbab454 · Cited by 389
Applications of transformer-based language models in bioinformatics: a survey
Zhang, S., Fan, R., Liu, Y., Chen, S., Liu, Q., & Zeng, W. (2023) · Bioinformatics Advances · doi:10.1093/bioadv/vbad001 · Cited by 176
The BioImage Archive – Building a Home for Life-Sciences Microscopy Data
Hartley, M., Kleywegt, G. J., Patwardhan, A., Sarkans, U., Swedlow, J. R., & Brazma, A. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167505 · Cited by 159
Predictability of human differential gene expression
Crow, M., Lim, N., Ballouz, S., Pavlidis, P., & Gillis, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1802973116 · Cited by 117
Ghosh, D., Ding, L., Sivaprasad, U., Geh, E., Biagini Myers, J., Bernstein, J. A., Khurana Hershey, G. K., & Mersha, T. B. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144316 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Rung, J., & Brazma, A.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Genetics
- Published
- 2012-12-27
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 89-99
- ISSN
- 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-0064
- OpenAlex
- W1981849943
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 1.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reuse of public genome-wide gene expression data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nrg3394
- The paper
- Rung, J., & Brazma, A. (2013). Reuse of public genome-wide gene expression data. Nature Reviews Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3394
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
