The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 115 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring the three-dimensional organization of genomes: interpreting chromatin interaction data
Open accessAbstract
How DNA is organized in three dimensions inside the cell nucleus and how this affects the ways in which cells access, read and interpret genetic information are among the longest standing questions in cell biology. Using newly developed molecular, genomic and computational approaches based on the chromosome conformation capture technology (such as 3C, 4C, 5C and Hi-C), the spatial organization of genomes is being explored at unprecedented resolution. Interpreting the increasingly large chromatin interaction data sets is now posing novel challenges. Here we describe several types of statistical and computational approaches that have recently been developed to analyse chromatin interaction data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Polymorphic cis-REs have been shown to influence CTCF binding (71, 72) and DNA looping (73).”
From Variation in the Oxytocin Receptor Gene Predicts Brain Region–Specific Expression and Social Attachment (2016) · cites this paper as [73]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome
The ENCODE Project Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11247 · Cited by 18,072
Self-citationComprehensive Mapping of Long-Range Interactions Reveals Folding Principles of the Human Genome
Lieberman-Aiden, E., van Berkum, N. L., Williams, L., Imakaev, M., Ragoczy, T., Telling, A., Amit, I., Lajoie, B. R., Sabo, P. J., Dorschner, M. O., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1181369 · Cited by 8,898
Self-citationTopological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions
Dixon, J. R., Selvaraj, S., Yue, F., Kim, A., Li, Y., Shen, Y., Hu, M., Liu, J. S., & Ren, B. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11082 · Cited by 6,829
Rubinstein, M., & Colby, R. H. (2003) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198520597.001.0001 · Cited by 5,686
Capturing Chromosome Conformation
Dekker, J., Rippe, K., Dekker, M., & Kleckner, N. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1067799 · Cited by 3,652
Self-citationSpatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre
Nora, E. P., Lajoie, B. R., Schulz, E. G., Giorgetti, L., Okamoto, I., Servant, N., Piolot, T., van Berkum, N. L., Meisig, J., Sedat, J., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11049 · Cited by 2,895
Self-citationThe accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome
Thurman, R. E., Rynes, E., Humbert, R., Vierstra, J., Maurano, M. T., Haugen, E., Sheffield, N. C., Stergachis, A. B., Wang, H., Vernot, B., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11232 · Cited by 2,679
Self-citationChromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells
Cremer, T. J., & Cremer, C. G. (2001) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/35066075 · Cited by 2,423
Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions
Guelen, L., Pagie, L., Brasset, É., Meuleman, W. R. A., Faza, M. B., Talhout, W., Eussen, B. H. J., de Klein, A., Wessels, L. F. A., de Laat, W. L., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06947 · Cited by 2,042
Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome
Sexton, T., Yaffe, E., Kenigsberg, E., Bantignies, F., Leblanc, B., Hoichman, M., Parrinello, H., Tanay, A., & Cavalli, G. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.010 · Cited by 1,983
Cited by
Sorted by citations
HiGlass: web-based visual exploration and analysis of genome interaction maps
Kerpedjiev, P., Abdennur, N. A., Lekschas, F., McCallum, C., Dinkla, K., Strobelt, H., Luber, J. M., Ouellette, S., Azhir, A., Kumar, N., et al. (2018) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1486-1 · Cited by 2,430
Self-citationThree-dimensional Epigenome Statistical Model: Genome-wide Chromatin Looping Prediction
Bkhetan, Z. A., & Plewczyński, D. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-23276-8 · Cited by 1,672
Ten years of next-generation sequencing technology
van Dijk, E., Auger, H., Jaszczyszyn, Y., & Thermes, C. (2014) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2014.07.001 · Cited by 1,755
Sequencing depth and coverage: key considerations in genomic analyses
Sims, D., Sudbery, I. M., Ilott, N. E., Heger, A., & Ponting, C. P. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3642 · Cited by 1,488
A high-resolution map of the three-dimensional chromatin interactome in human cells
Jin, F., Li, Y., Dixon, J. R., Selvaraj, S., Ye, Z., Lee, A. Y., Yen, C.-A., Schmitt, A. D., Espinoza, C. A., & Ren, B. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12644 · Cited by 1,208
Metadata
- Authors
- Dekker, J., Marti-Renom, M. A., & Mirny, L. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dekker, Job
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Genetics
- Published
- 2013-05-09
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 390-403
- ISSN
- 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-0064
- PMC
- PMC3874835
- OpenAlex
- W1574083126
- Cited by
- 1,068
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 107 · 2017: 122 · 2016: 122 · 2015: 121 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 30
- FWCI
- 11.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
- PMC
- Funders
- W. M. Keck Foundation
- European Commission (282510)
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (BFU2010-19310)
- National Institutes of Health (HG003143)
- National Human Genome Research Institute (HG003143, HG003143-06S1, R01HG003143)
- National Cancer Institute (U54CA143874)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Keywords
- 3D genome organization, chromatin interactions, chromosome conformation capture, Hi-C, 4Cs, 5C, nuclear organization, gene expression regulation, chromatin accessibility
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Chromatin, Chromosome Mapping, Chromosomes, Human, Epistasis, Genetic, Humans, Models, Genetic, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Genome, Human
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
