The DOI matches its Crossref record; 155 of the 155 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork
Open accessAbstract
Aberrant DNA replication is a major source of the mutations and chromosome rearrangements that are associated with pathological disorders. When replication is compromised, DNA becomes more prone to breakage. Secondary structures, highly transcribed DNA sequences and damaged DNA stall replication forks, which then require checkpoint factors and specialized enzymatic activities for their stabilization and subsequent advance. These mechanisms ensure that the local DNA damage response, which enables replication fork progression and DNA repair in S phase, is coupled with cell cycle transitions. The mechanisms that operate in eukaryotic cells to promote replication fork integrity and coordinate replication with other aspects of chromosome maintenance are becoming clear.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“H2AX is phosphorylated both in G1 and S phases by ATR in response to UV irradiation [26;32–38].”
From ATR- and ATM-Mediated DNA Damage Response Is Dependent on Excision Repair Assembly during G1 but Not in S Phase of Cell Cycle (2016) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“Previous studies support that ATR is predominantly responsible for DDR upon UVR exposure”
From ATR- and ATM-Mediated DNA Damage Response Is Dependent on Excision Repair Assembly during G1 but Not in S Phase of Cell Cycle (2016) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“To maintain genome stability, the DDR pathways are conserved surveillance mechanisms coordinating DNA repair, cell cycle progression, transcription, apoptosis, and senescence [19, 39–41].”
From Functional interplay between ATM/ATR-mediated DNA damage response and DNA repair pathways in oxidative stress (2014) · cites this paper as [41]
In the citing paper
“5′-primed ssDNA coated with RPA (RPA-ssDNA) is the determinant DNA structure for ATR activation in response to stalled DNA replication forks or DNA damage [41, 94–96].”
From Functional interplay between ATM/ATR-mediated DNA damage response and DNA repair pathways in oxidative stress (2014) · cites this paper as [41]
Citations
Cites
Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA
Lindahl, T. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/362709a0 · Cited by 5,679
Molecular Mechanisms of Mammalian DNA Repair and the DNA Damage Checkpoints
Sancar, A., Lindsey-Boltz, L. A., Ünsal-Kaçmaz, K., & Linn, S. (2004) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073723 · Cited by 3,317
DNA Topoisomerases: Structure, Function, and Mechanism
Champoux, J. J. (2001) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.369 · Cited by 2,804
Cellular roles of DNA topoisomerases: a molecular perspective
Wang, J. C. (2002) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm831 · Cited by 2,364
RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO
Hoege, C., Pfander, B., Moldovan, G., Pyrowolakis, G., & Jentsch, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00991 · Cited by 2,202
Concepts in sumoylation: a decade on
Geiss‐Friedlander, R., & Melchior, F. (2007) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2293 · Cited by 1,844
Wang, J. C. (1996) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.003223 · Cited by 1,838
Trinucleotide Repeat Disorders
Orr, H. T., & Zoghbi, H. Y. (2007) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113042 · Cited by 1,394
Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle
Branzei, D., & Foiani, M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2351 · Cited by 1,228
Self-citationThe Bloom's syndrome helicase suppresses crossing over during homologous recombination
Wu, L., & Hickson, I. D. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02253 · Cited by 1,087
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 778
Bournique, E., Dall’Osto, M., Hoffmann, J., & Bergoglio, V. (2017) · Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2017.08.002 · Cited by 26
Replication stress in hematopoietic stem cells in mouse and man
Flach, J., & Milyavsky, M. (2017) · Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2017.10.001 · Cited by 23
AKT signaling promotes DNA damage accumulation and proliferation in polycystic kidney disease
Conduit, S. E., Davies, E. M., Ooms, L. M., Gurung, R., McGrath, M. J., Hakim, S., Cottle, D. L., Smyth, I., Dyson, J. M., & Mitchell, C. A. (2019) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddz232 · Cited by 23
When RAD52 Allows Mitosis to Accept Unscheduled DNA Synthesis
Franchet, C., & Hoffmann, J. (2019) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers12010026 · Cited by 25
A Noncanonical DNA Damage Checkpoint Response in a Major Fungal Pathogen
Shor, E., Garcia‐Rubio, R., DeGregorio, L., & Perlin, D. S. (2020) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.03044-20 · Cited by 24
Cabello-Lobato, M. J., González‐Garrido, C., Cano-Linares, M. I., Wong, R. P. C., Yáñez‐Vilches, A., Morillo‐Huesca, M., Roldán‐Romero, J. M., Vicioso‐Mantis, M., González‐Prieto, R., Ulrich, H. D., et al. (2021) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109440 · Cited by 25
The Role of the Transcriptional Response to DNA Replication Stress
Herlihy, A. E., & de Bruin, R. A. M. (2017) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes8030092 · Cited by 26
Villa‐Hernández, S., & Bermejo, R. (2018) · Current Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00294-018-0824-x · Cited by 22
PROBING GENOME MAINTENANCE FUNCTIONS OF HUMAN RECQ1
Sami, F., & Sharma, S. (2013) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.5936/csbj.201303014 · Cited by 22
Overexpression of RFC3 is correlated with ovarian tumor development and poor prognosis
Shen, H., Cai, M., Zhao, S., Wang, H., Li, M., Yao, S., & Jiang, N. (2014) · Tumor Biology · doi:10.1007/s13277-014-2216-2 · Cited by 22
Getting Ready for the Dance: FANCJ Irons Out DNA Wrinkles
Bharti, S., Awate, S., Banerjee, T., & Brosh, R. M. (2016) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes7070031 · Cited by 22
Choi, E.-H., Yoon, S., Hahn, Y., & Kim, K. P. (2017) · Molecules and Cells · doi:10.14348/molcells.2017.2275 · Cited by 22
Error‐free DNA damage tolerance pathway is facilitated by the Irc5 translocase through cohesin
Litwin, I., Bakowski, T., Szakál, B., Pilarczyk, E., Maciaszczyk-Dziubińska, E., Branzei, D., & Wysocki, R. (2018) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201798732 · Cited by 23
Self-citationMohiuddin, M., Rahman, M. M., Sale, J. E., & Pearson, C. E. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz009 · Cited by 26
Direct binding of Cdt2 to PCNA is important for targeting the CRL4 Cdt2 E3 ligase activity to Cdt1
Hayashi, A., Giakoumakis, N.-N., Heidebrecht, T., Ishii, T., Παναγόπουλος, Α., Caillat, C., Takahara, M., Hibbert, R. G., Suenaga, N., Stadnik-Spiewak, M., et al. (2018) · Life Science Alliance · doi:10.26508/lsa.201800238 · Cited by 22
E3 ligase RFWD3 is a novel modulator of stalled fork stability in BRCA2-deficient cells
Duan, H., Mansour, S., Reed, R., Gillis, M. K., Parent, B., Liu, B., Sztupinszki, Z. M., Birkbak, N. J., Szállási, Z., Elia, A. E. H., et al. (2020) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201908192 · Cited by 22
Detection of PCNA Modifications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Davies, A. A., & Ulrich, H. D. (2012) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-998-3_36 · Cited by 22
Slx4 scaffolding in homologous recombination and checkpoint control: lessons from yeast
Cussiol, J. R. R., Dibitetto, D., Pellicioli, A., & Smolka, M. B. (2016) · Chromosoma · doi:10.1007/s00412-016-0600-y · Cited by 21
A Novel Cell-Penetrating Antibody Fragment Inhibits the DNA Repair Protein RAD51
Pastushok, L., Fu, Y., Lin, L. S., Luo, Y., DeCoteau, J. F., Lee, K. C. L., & Geyer, C. R. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-47600-y · Cited by 21
Paniza, T., Deshpande, M., Wang, N., O’Neil, R. C., Zuccaro, M. V., Smith, M. E., Madireddy, A., James, D., Ecker, J. R., Rosenwaks, Z., et al. (2020) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201909163 · Cited by 21
Pellicanò, G., Mamun, M. A., Jurado-Santiago, D., Villa‐Hernández, S., Yin, X., Giannattasio, M., Lanz, M. C., Smolka, M. B., Yeeles, J. T. P., Shirahige, K., et al. (2021) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2021.04.006 · Cited by 21
Hannes, F., Houdt, J. V., Quarrell, O., Poot, M., Hochstenbach, R., Fryns, J., & Vermeesch, J. R. (2010) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.21368 · Cited by 21
TIPIN depletion leads to apoptosis in breast cancer cells
Baldeyron, C., Brisson, A., Tesson, B. M., Némati, F., Koundrioukoff, S., Saliba, E., de Koning, L., Martel, E., Ye, M., Rigaill, G. J., et al. (2015) · Molecular Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.molonc.2015.04.010 · Cited by 23
The Smc5-Smc6 heterodimer associates with DNA through several independent binding domains
Roy, M.-A., Dhanaraman, T., & D’Amours, D. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep09797 · Cited by 21
Goncalves, T., Cunniffe, S. M. T., Ma, T. S., Mattis, N., Rose, A. W., Kent, T., Mole, D. R., Geiller, H. E. B., van Bijsterveldt, L., Humphrey, T. C., et al. (2025) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaf061 · Cited by 20
Renaud, E., & Rosselli, F. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053693 · Cited by 20
BRCA2 gets protective at forks
Huddleston, J. E. (2011) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3135 · Cited by 20
Back to the Origin: Reconsidering Replication, Transcription, Epigenetics, and Cell Cycle Control
Evertts, A. G., & Coller, H. A. (2012) · Genes & Cancer · doi:10.1177/1947601912474891 · Cited by 23
RECQ1 interacts with FEN-1 and promotes binding of FEN-1 to telomeric chromatin
Sami, F., Lu, X., Parvathaneni, S., Roy, R., Gary, R. K., & Sharma, S. (2015) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20141021 · Cited by 20
Kirkland, J. G., & Kamakaka, R. T. (2013) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201211105 · Cited by 21
Mochizuki, A. L., Katanaya, A., Hayashi, E., Hosokawa, M., Moribe, E., Motegi, A., Ishiai, M., Takata, M., Kondoh, G., Watanabe, H., et al. (2017) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00117-17 · Cited by 20
PCNA Deubiquitylases Control DNA Damage Bypass at Replication Forks
Álvarez, V., Frattini, C., Sacristán, M. P., Gallego-Sánchez, A., Bermejo, R., & Bueno, A. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.054 · Cited by 20
Importin β-dependent nuclear import of TopBP1 in ATR–Chk1 checkpoint in Xenopus egg extracts
Bai, L., Michael, W. M., & Yan, S. (2014) · Cellular Signalling · doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2014.01.006 · Cited by 19
Wang, C., Huang, J., Zhang, J., Wang, H., Han, Y., Copenhaver, G. P., Mā, H., & Wang, Y. (2018) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.18.00861 · Cited by 19
In vivo DNA replication dynamics unveil aging-dependent replication stress
Rossetti, G. G., Dommann, N., Karamichali, A., Dionellis, V. S., Aldave, A. A., Yarahmadov, T., Rodríguez-Carballo, E., Keogh, A., Candinas, D., Stroka, D., et al. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.08.034 · Cited by 22
Adenovirus E1A Oncogene Induces Rereplication of Cellular DNA and Alters DNA Replication Dynamics
Singhal, G., Leo, E., Setty, S. K. G., Pommier, Y. G., & Thimmapaya, B. (2013) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.00879-13 · Cited by 21
Chen, L., Zhou, W., Zhang, C., Lupski, J. R., Li, J., & Zhang, F. (2014) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddu572 · Cited by 19
Su, W., Hsu, S.-H., Wu, C.-K., Chang, S., Lin, Y.-J., Yang, W., Hung, J., Chiu, W., Tzeng, S., Tseng, Y., et al. (2014) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.2210 · Cited by 20
Histone H2B mono-ubiquitylation maintains genomic integrity at stalled replication forks
Northam, M. R., & Trujillo, K. M. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw658 · Cited by 19
Regulation of ETAA1-mediated ATR activation couples DNA replication fidelity and genome stability
Achuthankutty, D., Thakur, R. S., Haahr, P., Hoffmann, S., Drainas, A. P., Bizard, A. H., Weischenfeldt, J., Hickson, I. D., & Mailand, N. (2019) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201905064 · Cited by 19
Nuclear actin and myosin in chromatin regulation and maintenance of genome integrity
Venit, T., Mahmood, S. R., Endara-Coll, M., & Percipalle, P. (2020) · International review of cytology · doi:10.1016/bs.ircmb.2020.05.001 · Cited by 20
Li, X., Ren, J., Chen, P., Chen, Y., Wu, M. C., Wu, Y., Chen, K., & Li, J. (2018) · Acta Pharmacologica Sinica · doi:10.1038/aps.2017.187 · Cited by 19
Myers, T. R., Amendola, P. G., Lussi, Y., & Salcini, A. E. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21914-9 · Cited by 18
Ahmed, S. M., Ramani, P. D., Wong, S. Q. R., Zhao, X., Iványi-Nagy, R., Tang, C. L., Chua, C., Li, Z., Hentze, H., Tan, I. B., et al. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215696 · Cited by 18
Lin, Y., Li, J., Zhao, H., McMahon, A., McGhee, K., & Yan, S. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.82324 · Cited by 18
Binding of Multiple Rap1 Proteins Stimulates Chromosome Breakage Induction during DNA Replication
Goto, G. H., Zencir, S., Hirano, Y., Ogi, H., Ivessa, A., & Sugimoto, K. (2015) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005283 · Cited by 18
Shelterin components mediate genome reorganization in response to replication stress
Mizuguchi, T., Taneja, N., Matsuda, E., Belton, J.-M., FitzGerald, P. C., Dekker, J., & Grewal, S. I. S. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1705527114 · Cited by 18
Wigan, M., Pinder, A., Giles, N., Pavey, S., Burgess, A., Wong, S., Sturm, R. A., & Gabrielli, B. (2012) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/jid.2012.41 · Cited by 17
Zhang, M., Su, L., Wang, W., Li, C., Liang, Q., Ji, F., & Jiao, J. (2022) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111350 · Cited by 18
Watanabe, T., Tanabe, H., & Horiuchi, T. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr442 · Cited by 17
Chen, Y.-H., Szakál, B., Castellucci, F., Branzei, D., & Zhao, X. (2013) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e12-11-0836 · Cited by 17
Self-citationWeinheimer, A. S., Paung, Y., Rageul, J., Khan, A., Lo, N., Ho, B., Tong, M., Alphonse, S., Seeliger, M. A., & Kim, H. (2022) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102268 · Cited by 17
MDM2 Overexpression, Activation of Signaling Networks, and Cell Proliferation
Deb, S. P., Singh, S., & Deb, S. (2014) · Sub-cellular biochemistry/Subcellular biochemistry · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9211-0_12 · Cited by 18
Xu, Y., Wu, X., & Her, C. (2015) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m115.642884 · Cited by 19
Saunders, P. O., Weiss, J., Welschinger, R., Baraz, R., Bradstock, K. F., & Bendall, L. J. (2012) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2012.498 · Cited by 17
Nguyen, T., Hawkins, E., Kolluri, A., Kmieciak, M., Park, H., Lin, H., & Grant, S. (2014) · Leukemia Research · doi:10.1016/j.leukres.2014.10.009 · Cited by 17
Tipin Functions in the Protection against Topoisomerase I Inhibitor
Hosono, Y., Abe, T., Higuchi, M., Kajii, K., Sakuraba, S., Tada, S., Enomoto, T., & Seki, M. (2014) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m113.531707 · Cited by 17
A genome-wide map of adeno-associated virus–mediated human gene targeting
Deyle, D. R., Hansen, R. S., Cornea, A. M., Li, L. B., Burt, A., Alexander, I. E., Sandstrom, R. S., Stamatoyannopoulos, J. A., Wei, C., & Russell, D. W. (2014) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2895 · Cited by 18
Nanoscale Assembly of High-Mobility Group AT-Hook 2 Protein with DNA Replication Fork
Krahn, N., Meier, M., To, V., Booy, E. P., McEleney, K., O’Neil, J. D., McKenna, S. A., Patel, T. R., & Stetefeld, J. (2017) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2017.10.026 · Cited by 17
Prevention of unwanted recombination at damaged replication forks
Lehmann, C. P., Jiménez-Martín, A., Branzei, D., & Tercero, J. A. (2020) · Current Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00294-020-01095-7 · Cited by 19
Self-citationReplicating Damaged DNA in EukaryotesPreprint
Chatterjee, N., & Siede, W. (2013) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a019836 · Cited by 17
Dealing with Transcriptional Outbursts during S Phase to Protect Genomic Integrity
Duch, A., de Nadal, E., & Posas, F. (2013) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2013.08.019 · Cited by 16
γH2A-Binding Protein Brc1 Affects Centromere Function in Fission Yeast
Lee, S. Y., Rozenzhak, S., & Russell, P. R. (2013) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.01654-12 · Cited by 16
Krause, C. J., Popp, O., Thirunarayanan, N., Dittmar, G., Lipp, M., & Müller, G. (2016) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.7248 · Cited by 16
Henderson, M. L., & Kreuzer, K. N. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128092 · Cited by 16
Watanabe, T., Marotta, M. L., Suzuki, R., Diede, S. J., Tapscott, S. J., Niida, A., Chen, X., Mouakkad, L., Kondratova, A. A., Giuliano, A. E., et al. (2017) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.103 · Cited by 18
New origin firing is inhibited by APC/CCdh1activation in S-phase after severe replication stress
Ercilla, A., Llopis, A., Feu, S., Aranda, S., Ernfors, P., Freire, R., & Agell, N. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw132 · Cited by 16
Chromatin Architectural Factors as Safeguards against Excessive Supercoiling during DNA Replication
Ahmed, S. M., & Dröge, P. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21124504 · Cited by 16
Dolce, V., Dusi, S., Giannattasio, M., Joseph, C. R., Fumasoni, M., & Branzei, D. (2022) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.349207.121 · Cited by 16
Self-citationFetal hepatocytes protect the HSPC genome via fetuin-A
Guo, X., Wang, Y.-D., Liu, Y.-J., Chu, L., Zhu, H., Hu, Y., Wu, R., Xie, H., Yu, J., Shuiping, L., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08307-x · Cited by 15
The Budding Yeast Ubiquitin Protease Ubp7 Is a Novel Component Involved in S Phase Progression
Böhm, S., Szakál, B., Herken, B. W., Sullivan, M. R., Mihalevic, M. J., Kabbinavar, F. F., Branzei, D., Clark, N. L., & Bernstein, K. A. (2016) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m115.671057 · Cited by 15
Self-citationSingh, M. D., Thomas, P., Hor, M., Almond, T., Owens, J. A., Hague, W. M., & Fenech, M. F. (2017) · Mutagenesis · doi:10.1093/mutage/gex001 · Cited by 15
Distinct cellular responses to replication stress leading to apoptosis or senescence
Lukášová, E., Řezáčová, M., Bačı́ková, A., Šebejová, L., Vávrová, J., & Kozubek, S. (2019) · FEBS Open Bio · doi:10.1002/2211-5463.12632 · Cited by 17
Histone dynamics during DNA replication stress
Hsu, C.-L., Chong, S. Y., Lin, C., & Kao, C.-F. (2021) · Journal of Biomedical Science · doi:10.1186/s12929-021-00743-5 · Cited by 20
The Role of Topoisomerase II in DNA Repair and Recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana
Martínez‐García, M., White, C. I., Franklin, F. C. H., & Sánchez‐Morán, E. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms222313115 · Cited by 15
Patel, J. A., Zezelic, C., Rageul, J., Saldanha, J., Khan, A., & Kim, H. (2023) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad363 · Cited by 15
Central Role of Ubiquitination in Genome Maintenance: DNA Replication and Damage Repair
Ghosh, S., & Saha, T. (2012) · ISRN Molecular Biology · doi:10.5402/2012/146748 · Cited by 15
Ontogeny of Unstable Chromosomes Generated by Telomere Error in Budding Yeast
Beyer, T. E., & Weinert, T. A. (2016) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006345 · Cited by 16
Saha, L. K., Kim, S., Kang, H., Akter, M. S., Choi, K., Sakuma, T., Yamamoto, T., Sasanuma, H., Hirota, K., Nakamura, J., et al. (2018) · Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis · doi:10.1002/em.22201 · Cited by 15
Zhai, B., DuPrez, K. T., Han, X., Yuan, Z., Ahmad, S., Xu, C., Gu, L., Ni, J., Fan, L., & Shen, Y. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky451 · Cited by 16
APE1 is a master regulator of the ATR-/ATM-mediated DNA damage response
Zhao, H., Richardson, C. A., Marriott, I., Yang, I. H., & Yan, S. (2024) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2024.103776 · Cited by 14
Mitotic chromatin marking governs the segregation of DNA damage
Ferrand, J., Dabin, J., Chevallier, O., Kane-Charvin, M., Kupai, A., Hrit, J. A., Rothbart, S. B., & Polo, S. E. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-56090-8 · Cited by 14
The checkpoint transcriptional response: Make sure to turn it off once you are satisfied
Smolka, M. B., de Oliveira, F. M. B., Harris, M. R., & de Bruin, R. A. M. (2012) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/cc.21197 · Cited by 14
Ku Stabilizes Replication Forks in the Absence of Brc1
Sánchez, A., & Russell, P. R. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126598 · Cited by 18
Malacaria, E., Franchitto, A., & Pichierri, P. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep44464 · Cited by 17
Shiu, J.-L., Wu, C.-K., Chang, S., Sun, Y.-J., Chen, Y., Lai, C., Chiu, W., Chang, W., Myung, K., Su, W., et al. (2020) · Oncogenesis · doi:10.1038/s41389-020-00289-5 · Cited by 15
Goto, M., Sasaki, M., & Kobayashi, T. (2021) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00324-20 · Cited by 14
Swain, U., Friedlander, G., Sehrawat, U., Sarusi-Portuguez, A., Rotkopf, R., Ebert, C., Paz-Elizur, T., Dikstein, R., Carell, T., Geacintov, N. E., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22136957 · Cited by 14
Yao, H., Zhou, X., Zhou, A., Chen, J., Chen, G., Shi, X., Shi, B., Tai, Q., Mi, X., Zhou, G., et al. (2023) · Molecular Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1002/mc.23523 · Cited by 14
Phosphorylation of a C-terminal auto-inhibitory domain increases SMARCAL1 activity
Carroll, C., Bansbach, C. E., Zhao, R., Jung, S. Y., Qin, J., & Cortez, D. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt929 · Cited by 14
Manfrini, N., Gobbini, E., Baldo, V., Trovesi, C., Lucchini, G., & Longhese, M. P. (2012) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00956-12 · Cited by 15
Qin, N., Wang, C., Lü, Q., Ma, Z., Dai, J., Ma, H., Jin, G., Shen, H., & Hu, Z. (2017) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.21930 · Cited by 14
A whole genome RNAi screen identifies replication stress response genes
Kavanaugh, G. M., Ye, F., Mohni, K. N., Luzwick, J. W., Glick, G. G., & Cortez, D. (2015) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.09.024 · Cited by 16
Long-distance inflammatory and genotoxic impact of cancer in vivo
Bártek, J., Mistrík, M., & Bártková, J. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1013093107 · Cited by 14
DNA replication timing reveals genome-wide features of transcription and fragility
Berkemeier, F., Cook, P. R., & Boemo, M. A. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59991-w · Cited by 13
Exploring replication stress and cellular senescence as key targets in novel cancer therapies
Ray, S. K., & Mukherjee, S. (2025) · Cancer Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.cancergen.2025.09.002 · Cited by 14
Distinct roles of structure-specific endonucleases EEPD1 and Metnase in replication stress responses
Sharma, N., Speed, M. C., Allen, C., Maranon, D. G., Williamson, E. A., Singh, S., Hromas, R., & Nickoloff, J. A. (2020) · NAR Cancer · doi:10.1093/narcan/zcaa008 · Cited by 13
Protective Mechanisms Against DNA Replication Stress in the Nervous System
Charlier, C. F., & Martins, R. A. P. (2020) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes11070730 · Cited by 16
Fumasoni, M., & Murray, A. W. (2021) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1009875 · Cited by 13
Li, Q., Zhou, J., Li, S., Zhang, W., Du, Y., Li, K., Wang, Y., & Sun, Q. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43680-7 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Branzei, D., & Foiani, M.
- Affiliations
- IFOM (IT)
- University of Milan (IT)
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 208-219
- ISSN
- 1471-0072 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-0080
- OpenAlex
- W2063979868
- Cited by
- 786
- References
- 155
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 73 · 2013: 82 · 2012: 73
- FWCI
- 6.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- zenodo.org
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen (submittedVersion)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
- Keywords
- genome stability, DNA replication, replication fork, replication fork stalling, DNA secondary structure, DNA damage response, DNA repair, S phase, chromosome maintenance, genetic mutations, chromosomal rearrangements
- MeSH terms
- Animals, DNA, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, DNA Replication, Humans, Models, Biological, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Replication Origin, Genomic Instability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review