Cited by 148Cell Adhesion Molecules ResearchBiochemical and Structural CharacterizationProtease and Inhibitor Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structural determinants of integrin β-subunit specificity for latent TGF-β

Open access
Dong, Xianchi, Hudson, Nathan E, Lu, Chafen, Springer, Timothy A·2014·Nature Structural & Molecular Biology

Abstract

Eight integrin α-β heterodimers recognize ligands with an Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) motif. However, the structural mechanism by which integrins differentiate among extracellular proteins with RGD motifs is not understood. Here, crystal structures, mutations and peptide-affinity measurements show that αVβ6 binds with high affinity to a RGDLXXL/I motif within the prodomains of TGF-β1 and TGF-β3. The LXXL/I motif forms an amphipathic α-helix that binds in a hydrophobic pocket in the β6 subunit. Elucidation of the basis for ligand binding specificity by the integrin β subunit reveals contributions by three different βI-domain loops, which we designate specificity-determining loops (SDLs) 1, 2 and 3. Variation in a pair of single key residues in SDL1 and SDL3 correlates with the variation of the entire β subunit in integrin evolution, thus suggesting a paradigmatic role in overall β-subunit function.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nsmb.2905

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 40 references

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–148 of 148

Metadata

Authors
Dong, X., Hudson, N. E., Lu, C., & Springer, T. A.
Affiliations
Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Springer, Timothy A
Venue
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Published
2014-11-10
Volume
21
Issue
12
Pages
1091-1096
ISSN
  • 1545-9985 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-9993
OpenAlex
W2017269651
Cited by
141
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8
FWCI
8.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P01HL103526)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
Keywords
integrin αvβ6, latent TGF-beta1, RGD motif, ligand specificity, amphipathic helix, hydrophobic pocket
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Antigens, Neoplasm, Binding Sites, Humans, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Integrins, Sequence Alignment, Crystallography, X-Ray, Transforming Growth Factor beta1, Transforming Growth Factor beta3, Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs, HEK293 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review