CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 151

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A mammalian nervous-system-specific plasma membrane proteasome complex that modulates neuronal function

Ramachandran, Kapil V, Margolis, Seth S·2017·Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
DOI 10.1038/nsmb.3389PMC PMC5383508
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nsmb.3389

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Coux, O., Tanaka, K. & Goldberg, A.L. Structure and functions of the 20S and 26S proteasomes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65, 801–847 (1996). · DOI
  2. Ciechanover, A. The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway: on protein death and cell life. EMBO J. 17, 7151–7160 (1998). · DOI
  3. Ciechanover, A. & Schwartz, A.L. The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway: the complexity and myriad functions of proteins death. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 2727–2730 (1998). · DOI
  4. Ben-Nissan, G. & Sharon, M. Regulating the 20S proteasome ubiquitin-independent degradation pathway. Biomolecules 4, 862–884 (2014). · DOI
  5. Kisselev, A.F., van der Linden, W.A. & Overkleeft, H.S. Proteasome inhibitors: an expanding army attacking a unique target. Chem. Biol. 19, 99–115 (2012). · DOI
  6. Wang, H.R. et al. Regulation of cell polarity and protrusion formation by targeting RhoA for degradation. Science 302, 1775–1779 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Karpova, A., Mikhaylova, M., Thomas, U., Knöpfel, T. & Behnisch, T. Involvement of protein synthesis and degradation in long-term potentiation of Schaffer collateral CA1 synapses. J. Neurosci. 26, 4949–4955 (2006). · DOI
  8. Cai, F., Frey, J.U., Sanna, P.P. & Behnisch, T. Protein degradation by the proteasome is required for synaptic tagging and the heterosynaptic stabilization of hippocampal late-phase long-term potentiation. Neuroscience 169, 1520–1526 (2010). · DOI
  9. Rinetti, G.V. & Schweizer, F.E. Ubiquitination acutely regulates presynaptic neurotransmitter release in mammalian neurons. J. Neurosci. 30, 3157–3166 (2010). · DOI
  10. Wu, S. et al. Cellular calcium deficiency plays a role in neuronal death caused by proteasome inhibitors. J. Neurochem. 109, 1225–1236 (2009). · DOI
  11. Fonseca, R., Vabulas, R.M., Hartl, F.U., Bonhoeffer, T. & Nägerl, U.V. A balance of protein synthesis and proteasome-dependent degradation determines the maintenance of LTP. Neuron 52, 239–245 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Pines, J. & Lindon, C. Proteolysis: anytime, any place, anywhere? Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 731–735 (2005). · DOI
  13. Asano, S. et al. Proteasomes. A molecular census of 26S proteasomes in intact neurons. Science 347, 439–442 (2015). · DOI
  14. Patrick, G.N., Bingol, B., Weld, H.A. & Schuman, E.M. Ubiquitin-mediated proteasome activity is required for agonist-induced endocytosis of GluRs. Curr. Biol. 13, 2073–2081 (2003). · DOI
  15. van Weering, J.R. et al. Intracellular membrane traffic at high resolution. Methods Cell Biol. 96, 619–648 (2010). · DOI
  16. Chen, X. et al. PSD-95 family MAGUKs are essential for anchoring AMPA and NMDA receptor complexes at the postsynaptic density. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, E6983–E6992 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  17. Gazula, V.R. et al. Localization of Kv1.3 channels in presynaptic terminals of brainstem auditory neurons. J. Comp. Neurol. 518, 3205–3220 (2010). · DOI
  18. Hanley, J.G., Khatri, L., Hanson, P.I. & Ziff, E.B. NSF ATPase and alpha-/beta-SNAPs disassemble the AMPA receptor-PICK1 complex. Neuron 34, 53–67 (2002). · DOI
  19. Peebles, C.L. et al. Arc regulates spine morphology and maintains network stability in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 18173–18178 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  20. Lin, D.T. et al. Regulation of AMPA receptor extrasynaptic insertion by 4.1N, phosphorylation and palmitoylation. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 879–887 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  21. Ehlers, M.D. Reinsertion or degradation of AMPA receptors determined by activity-dependent endocytic sorting. Neuron 28, 511–525 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  22. Caterina, M.J., Hereld, D. & Devreotes, P.N. Occupancy of the Dictyostelium cAMP receptor, cAR1, induces a reduction in affinity which depends upon COOH-terminal serine residues. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 4418–4423 (1995). · DOI
  23. Zhu, P.P. et al. Cellular localization, oligomerization, and membrane association of the hereditary spastic paraplegia 3A (SPG3A) protein atlastin. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 49063–49071 (2003). · DOI
  24. Wunder, C., Lippincott-Schwartz, J. & Lorenz, H. Determining membrane protein topologies in single cells and high-throughput screening applications. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. Chapter 5, Unit 5.7 (2010). · DOI
  25. Lee, Y.C., Srajer Gajdosik, M., Josic, D. & Lin, S.H. Plasma membrane isolation using immobilized concanavalin A magnetic beads. Methods Mol. Biol. 909, 29–41 (2012). · DOI
  26. Smith, M.J. & Koch, G.L. Multiple zones in the sequence of calreticulin (CRP55, calregulin, HACBP), a major calcium binding ER/SR protein. EMBO J. 8, 3581–3586 (1989). · DOI
  27. Park, S. et al. GDE2 promotes neurogenesis by glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchor cleavage of RECK. Science 339, 324–328 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  28. Besche, H.C., Haas, W., Gygi, S.P. & Goldberg, A.L. Isolation of mammalian 26S proteasomes and p97/VCP complexes using the ubiquitin-like domain from HHR23B reveals novel proteasome-associated proteins. Biochemistry 48, 2538–2549 (2009). · DOI
  29. Werner, H., Dimou, L., Klugmann, M., Pfeiffer, S. & Nave, K.A. Multiple splice isoforms of proteolipid M6B in neurons and oligodendrocytes. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 18, 593–605 (2001). · DOI
  30. Fuchsova, B., Fernández, M.E., Alfonso, J. & Frasch, A.C. Cysteine residues in the large extracellular loop (EC2) are essential for the function of the stress-regulated glycoprotein M6a. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 32075–32088 (2009). · DOI
  31. Schubert, U. et al. Rapid degradation of a large fraction of newly synthesized proteins by proteasomes. Nature 404, 770–774 (2000). · DOI
  32. Kisselev, A.F., Akopian, T.N. & Goldberg, A.L. Range of sizes of peptide products generated during degradation of different proteins by archaeal proteasomes. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1982–1989 (1998). · DOI
  33. Li, N. et al. Relative quantification of proteasome activity by activity-based protein profiling and LC-MS/MS. Nat. Protoc. 8, 1155–1168 (2013). · DOI
  34. Meng, L. et al. Epoxomicin, a potent and selective proteasome inhibitor, exhibits in vivo antiinflammatory activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 10403–10408 (1999). · DOI
  35. Patel, T.P., Man, K., Firestein, B.L. & Meaney, D.F. Automated quantification of neuronal networks and single-cell calcium dynamics using calcium imaging. J. Neurosci. Methods 243, 26–38 (2015). · DOI
  36. Sato, Y., Watanabe, N., Fukushima, N., Mita, S. & Hirata, T. Actin-independent behavior and membrane deformation exhibited by the four-transmembrane protein M6a. PLoS One 6, e26702 (2011). · DOI
  37. Besche, H.C. & Goldberg, A.L. Affinity purification of mammalian 26S proteasomes using an ubiquitin-like domain. Methods Mol. Biol. 832, 423–432 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  38. Tai, H.C. & Schuman, E.M. Ubiquitin, the proteasome and protein degradation in neuronal function and dysfunction. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 826–838 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  39. Tsvetkov, P. et al. Operational definition of intrinsically unstructured protein sequences based on susceptibility to the 20S proteasome. Proteins 70, 1357–1366 (2008). · DOI
  40. Tsvetkov, P., Reuven, N., Prives, C. & Shaul, Y. Susceptibility of p53 unstructured N terminus to 20 S proteasomal degradation programs the stress response. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 26234–26242 (2009). · DOI
  41. Schmidt, M. & Finley, D. Regulation of proteasome activity in health and disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1843, 13–25 (2014). · DOI
  42. Jiang, S., Dupont, N., Castillo, E.F. & Deretic, V. Secretory versus degradative autophagy: unconventional secretion of inflammatory mediators. J. Innate Immun. 5, 471–479 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  43. Lee, J.G., Takahama, S., Zhang, G., Tomarev, S.I. & Ye, Y. Unconventional secretion of misfolded proteins promotes adaptation to proteasome dysfunction in mammalian cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 765–776 (2016). · DOI
  44. Shatz, C.J. MHC class I: an unexpected role in neuronal plasticity. Neuron 64, 40–45 (2009). · DOI
  45. Xia, Z., Dudek, H., Miranti, C.K. & Greenberg, M.E. Calcium influx via the NMDA receptor induces immediate early gene transcription by a MAP kinase/ERK-dependent mechanism. J. Neurosci. 16, 5425–5436 (1996). · DOI
  46. Nicoll, R.A. & Roche, K.W. Long-term potentiation: peeling the onion. Neuropharmacology 74, 18–22 (2013). · DOI
  47. Kim, Y.S. et al. Central terminal sensitization of TRPV1 by descending serotonergic facilitation modulates chronic pain. Neuron 81, 873–887 (2014). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ramachandran, K. V., & Margolis, S. S.
Venue
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2017-03-13
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
419-430
ISSN
  • 1545-9993
  • 1545-9985
DOI
10.1038/nsmb.3389
PMC
PMC5383508
Cited by
151
References
11
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review