Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Self‐Reported Body Mass Index and Health‐Related Quality of Life: Findings from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

Open access
Ford, Earl S., Moriarty, David G., Zack, Matthew M., Mokdad, Ali H., Chapman, Daniel P.·2001·Obesity Research

Abstract

Objective: To examine the relationship between self‐reported body mass index (BMI) and health‐related quality of life in the general adult population in the United States. Research Methods and Procedures: Using data from 109,076 respondents in the 1996 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, we examined how self‐reported BMI is associated with five health‐related quality of life measures developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for population health surveillance. Results: After adjusting for age, gender, race or ethnicity, educational attainment, employment status, smoking status, and physical activity status, participants with a self‐reported BMI of <18.5 kg/m 2 and participants with a self‐reported BMI of ≥30 kg/m 2 reported impaired quality of life. Compared with persons with a self‐reported BMI of 18.5 to <25 kg/m 2, odds ratios (ORs) of poor or fair self‐rated health increased among persons with self‐reported BMIs of <18.5 (1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31 to 1.89), 25 to <30 kg/m 2 (1.12, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.20), 30 to <35 kg/m 2 (1.65, 95% CI: 1.50 to 1.81), 35 to <40 kg/m 2 (2.58, 95% CI: 2.21 to 3.00), and ≥40 kg/m 2 (3.23, 95% CI: 2.63 to 3.95); ORs for reporting ≥14 days of poor physical health during the previous 30 days were 1.44 (95% CI: 1.21 to 1.72), 1.04 (95% CI: 0.96 to 1.14), 1.32 (95% CI: 1.19 to 1.47), 1.80 (95% CI: 1.52 to 2.13), and 2.37 (95% CI: 1.90 to 2.94), respectively; ORs for having ≥14 days of poor mental health during the previous 30 days were 1.18 (95% CI: 0.97 to 1.42), 1.02 (95% CI: 0.95 to 1.11), 1.22 (95% CI: 1.10 to 1.36), 1.68 (95% CI: 1.42 to 1.98), and 1.66 (95% CI: 1.32 to 2.09), respectively. Discussion: In the largest study to date, low and increased self‐reported BMI significantly impaired health‐related quality of life. Particularly, deviations from normal BMI affected physical functioning more strongly than mental functioning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/oby.2001.4

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 340

Metadata

Authors
Ford, E. S., Moriarty, D. G., Zack, M. M., Mokdad, A. H., & Chapman, D. P.
Venue
Obesity Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
21-31
ISSN
  • 1071-7323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-8528
OpenAlex
W1976438339
Cited by
340
References
2
FWCI
15.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self‐Reported Body Mass Index and Health‐Related Quality of Life: Findings from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/oby.2001.4
The paper
Ford, E. S., Moriarty, D. G., Zack, M. M., Mokdad, A. H., & Chapman, D. P. (2001). Self‐Reported Body Mass Index and Health‐Related Quality of Life: Findings from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Obesity Research. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2001.4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.