Cited by 116Eating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity, Physical Activity, DietObesity and Health Practices

Psychological health in a non-clinical sample of obese women

Hill, AJ, Williams, J·1998·International Journal of Obesity

Abstract

Objectives The relationship between obesity and psychological health remains unclear. The aims of this study were to evaluate the effect of obesity on the psychological health of a non-clinical sample of obese women, to investigate binge eating in this group, and to examine the predictors of psychological distress.Design A cross-sectional comparison of women divided into three obesity groups (body mass index (BMI)= 30-34.9, 35-39.9, > or = 40) was used.Participants 179 women with a BMI > 30 (mean age 45 y) returned a questionnaire included in a subscriber-only magazine for women of size 16+.Measures The questionnaire asked for information on demographics, weight history and eating behaviour, and included established self-report measures of body shape assessment, body shape satisfaction, dietary restraint, mental health state and self-esteem.Results The heaviest women (BMI > 40) did not differ on measures of mental health, but expressed the greatest dissatisfaction with their body weight, shape and appearance, and had the lowest self-esteem. Frequent binge eating was reported by 25% of all women. Self-esteem and peer relationships, but not body weight, were highly significant negative predictors of poor mental health.Conclusions Poor mental health is not the inevitable consequence even of the most extreme obesity, but is related to both low self-esteem and poor peer relationships. These, and problems with eating control, are features of psychological morbidity that require recognition and therapeutic attention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800631

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hill, A., & Williams, J.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Venue
International Journal of Obesity
Published
1998-06
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
578-583
ISSN
  • 0307-0565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5497
OpenAlex
W1995917616
Cited by
115
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Leeds
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
obesity, mental health, binge eating, self-esteem, body dissatisfaction, peer relationships, body mass index, eating behaviour, dietary restraint, women
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Behavior, Body Image, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Eating, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Obesity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review