Cited by 392Obesity, Physical Activity, DietSurvey Methodology and NonresponseStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

The Validity of Obesity Based on Self‐reported Weight and Height: Implications for Population Studies

Open access
Nyholm, Maria, Gullberg, Bo, Merlo, Juan, Lundqvist‐Persson, Cristina, Råstam, Lennart, Lindblad, Ulf·2007·Obesity

Abstract

Objective: To validate self‐reported information on weight and height in an adult population and to find a useful algorithm to assess the prevalence of obesity based on self‐reported information. Research Methods and Procedures: This was a cross‐sectional survey consisting of 1703 participants (860 men and 843 women, 30 to 75 years old) conducted in the community of Vara, Sweden, from 2001 to 2003. Self‐reported weight, height, and corresponding BMI were compared with measured data. Obesity was defined as measured BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 . Information on education, self‐rated health, smoking habits, and physical activity during leisure time was collected by a self‐administered questionnaire. Results: Mean differences between measured and self‐reported weight were 1.6 kg (95% confidence interval, 1.4; 1.8) in men and 1.8 kg (1.6; 2.0) in women (measured higher), whereas corresponding differences in height were −0.3 cm (−0.5; −0.2) in men and −0.4 cm (−0.5; −0.2) in women (measured lower). Age and body size were important factors for misreporting height, weight, and BMI in both men and women. Obesity (measured) was found in 156 men (19%) and 184 women (25%) and with self‐reported data in 114 men (14%) and 153 women (20%). For self‐reported data, the sensitivity of obesity was 70% in men and 82% in women, and when adjusted for corrected self‐reported data and age, it increased to 81% and 90%, whereas the specificity decreased from 99% in both sexes to 97% in men and 98% in women. Discussion: The prevalence of obesity based on self‐reported BMI can be estimated more accurately when using an algorithm adjusted for variables that are predictive for misreporting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/oby.2007.536

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Hill JO, Peters JC. Environmental contribution of the obesity epidemic. Science. 1998;280:1371-4.
  2. Ferrannini E, Natail A, Bell P, Cavallo-Perin P, Lalic N, Mingrone G. Insulin resistance and hypersecretion in obesity. J Clin Invest. 1997;100:1116 -73.
  3. Bergstrom A, Pisani P, Tenet V, Wolk A, Adami HO. Overweight as an avoidable cause of cancer. Int J Cancer. 2001;91:421-30.
  4. ROC curve of corrected BMI adjusted for age (area under curve: 0.983 in men and 0.991 in women). Obesity Based on Self-Reported Weight and Height, Nyholm et al. OBESITY Vol. 15 No. 1 January 2007 207
  5. 1930739x, 2007, 1, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1038/oby.2007.536, Wiley Online Library on [08/08/2026]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
  6. Persson LÅ, Wall S. Epidemiology for Public Health. Umeå, Sweden: Print & Media; 2003, pp. 98 -103.
  7. Sundberg R. Multivariate calibration-direct and direct regres- sion methodology. Scand J Stat. 1999;26:161-207.
  8. Kuskowska-Wolk A, Ro ¨ssner S. The "true" prevalence of obesity. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1989;7:79 -82.
  9. Larsson I, Narbro K. Increasing trends of obesity in Sweden between 1996/97 and 2000/01: letter. Int J Obes Relat Metab. 2005;29:348 -49.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nyholm, M., Gullberg, B., Merlo, J., Lundqvist‐Persson, C., Råstam, L., & Lindblad, U.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Lindblad, Ulf
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
197-197
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W1994485561
Cited by
392
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 37
FWCI
31.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Lunds Universitet
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Health and Medical Care Committee of the Regional Executive Board, Region Västra Götaland
  • Medicinska Fakulteten, Lunds Universitet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
obesity prevalence, self-reported height and weight, body mass index, measurement error, misreporting, validation, sensitivity and specificity, correction algorithm, population survey
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Algorithms, Body Height, Body Weight, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Predictive Value of Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Disclosure, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sex Factors, Sweden, Reproducibility of Results, Body Mass Index, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review