Cited by 633Physical Activity and HealthErgonomics and Musculoskeletal DisordersNutritional Studies and Diet

Sedentary Behaviors and Health Outcomes Among Adults

Proper, Karin I., Singh, Amika S., van Mechelen, Willem, Chinapaw, Mai J.M.·2011·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Context Nowadays, people spend a substantial amount of time per day on sedentary behaviors and it is likely that the time spent sedentary will continue to rise. To date, there is no review of prospective studies that systematically examined the relationship between diverse sedentary behaviors and various health outcomes among adults.Purpose This review aimed to systematically review the literature as to the relationship between sedentary behaviors and health outcomes considering the methodologic quality of the studies.Evidence acquisition In February 2010, a search for prospective studies was performed in diverse electronic databases. After inclusion, in 2010, the methodologic quality of each study was assessed. A best-evidence synthesis was applied to draw conclusions.Evidence synthesis 19 studies were included, of which 14 were of high methodologic quality. Based on inconsistency in findings among the studies and lack of high-quality prospective studies, insufficient evidence was concluded for body weight-related measures, CVD risk, and endometrial cancer. Further, moderate evidence for a positive relationship between the time spent sitting and the risk for type 2 diabetes was concluded. Based on three high-quality studies, there was no evidence for a relationship between sedentary behavior and mortality from cancer, but strong evidence for all-cause and CVD mortality.Conclusions Given the trend toward increased time in sedentary behaviors, additional prospective studies of high methodologic quality are recommended to clarify the causal relationships between sedentary behavior and health outcomes. Meanwhile, evidence to date suggests that interventions aimed at reducing sedentary behavior are needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.015

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A growing body of literature suggests high sitting time is associated with higher risk of adverse health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, cancer and mortality, even after adjustment for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.

    “A growing body of literature suggests high sitting time is associated with higher risk of adverse health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, cancer and mortality, even after adjustment for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity[8-13].”
  • A systematic review of longitudinal studies of sedentary behaviors in adults found insufficient evidence for an association between sedentary behaviors and measures of adiposity or CV risk factors, including self-reported hypertension, but there was moderate evidence for an association with type 2 diabetes and strong evidence for an association with all-cause and CVD mortality.

    “A systematic review of longitudinal studies of sedentary behaviors in adults found insufficient evidence for an association between sedentary behaviors and measures of adiposity or CV risk factors, including self-reported hypertension, 147 but there was moderate evidence for an association with type 2 diabetes and strong evidence for an association with all-cause and CVD mortality.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Proper, K. I., Singh, A. S., van Mechelen, W., & Chinapaw, M. J. M.
Affiliations
Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
Corresponding author
Proper, Karin I.
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-02
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
174-182
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160813933
Cited by
633
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 33
FWCI
5.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
sedentary behavior, sitting time, health outcomes, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular risk, cancer mortality, all-cause mortality, body weight, endometrial cancer, sedentary behavior interventions, adults
MeSH terms
Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Young Adult, Sedentary Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review