Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 365

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hyperbolic Relationship Between Insulin Secretion and Sensitivity on Oral Glucose Tolerance Test

Open access
Retnakaran, Ravi, Shen, Sandy, Hanley, Anthony J., Vuksan, Vladimir, Hamilton, Jill K., Zinman, Bernard·2008·Obesity

Abstract

The utility of the disposition index as a measure of β‐cell compensatory capacity rests on the established hyperbolic relationship between its component insulin secretion and sensitivity measures as derived from the intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT). If one is to derive an analogous measure of β‐cell compensation from the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), it is thus necessary to first establish the existence of this hyperbolic relationship between OGTT‐based measures of insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity. In this context, we tested five OGTT‐based measures of secretion (insulinogenic index, Stumvoll first phase, Stumvoll second phase, ratio of total area‐under‐the‐insulin‐curve to area‐under‐the‐glucose‐curve (AUC ins/gluc), and incremental AUC ins/gluc) with two measures of sensitivity (Matsuda index and 1/Homeostasis Model of Assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR)). Using a model of log(secretion measure) = constant + β × log(sensitivity measure), a hyperbolic relationship can be established if β is approximately equal to −1, with 95% confidence interval (CI) excluding 0. In 277 women with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), the pairing of total AUC ins/gluc and Matsuda index was the only combination that satisfied these criteria (β = −0.99, 95% CI (−1.66, −0.33)). This pairing also satisfied hyperbolic criteria in 53 women with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (β = −1.02, (−1.72, −0.32)). In a separate data set, this pairing yielded distinct hyperbolae for NGT (n = 245) (β = −0.99, (−1.67, −0.32)), IGT (n = 116) (β = −1.18, (−1.84, −0.53)), and diabetes (n = 43) (β = −1.37, (−2.46, −0.29)). Moreover, the product of AUC ins/gluc and Matsuda index progressively decreased from NGT (212) to IGT (193) to diabetes (104) (P < 0.001), consistent with declining β‐cell function. In summary, a hyperbolic relationship can be demonstrated between OGTT‐derived AUC ins/gluc and Matsuda index across a range of glucose tolerance. Based on these findings, the product of these two indices emerges as a potential OGTT‐based measure of β‐cell function.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/oby.2008.307

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 365

Metadata

Authors
Retnakaran, R., Shen, S., Hanley, A. J., Vuksan, V., Hamilton, J. K., & Zinman, B.
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-08
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
1901-1907
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W2023300718
Cited by
365
References
13
FWCI
16.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hyperbolic Relationship Between Insulin Secretion and Sensitivity on Oral Glucose Tolerance Test. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/oby.2008.307
The paper
Retnakaran, R., Shen, S., Hanley, A. J., Vuksan, V., Hamilton, J. K., & Zinman, B. (2008). Hyperbolic Relationship Between Insulin Secretion and Sensitivity on Oral Glucose Tolerance Test. Obesity. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2008.307

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.