The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preterm-associated visual impairment and estimates of retinopathy of prematurity at regional and global levels for 2010
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a leading cause of potentially avoidable childhood blindness worldwide. We estimated ROP burden at the global and regional levels to inform screening and treatment programs, research, and data priorities. METHODS: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were undertaken to estimate the risk of ROP and subsequent visual impairment for surviving preterm babies by level of neonatal care, access to ROP screening, and treatment. A compartmental model was used to estimate ROP cases and numbers of visually impaired survivors. RESULTS: In 2010, an estimated 184,700 (uncertainty range: 169,600-214,500) preterm babies developed any stage of ROP, 20,000 (15,500-27,200) of whom became blind or severely visually impaired from ROP, and a further 12,300 (8,300-18,400) developed mild/moderate visual impairment. Sixty-five percent of those visually impaired from ROP were born in middle-income regions; 6.2% (4.3-8.9%) of all ROP visually impaired infants were born at >32-wk gestation. Visual impairment from other conditions associated with preterm birth will affect larger numbers of survivors. CONCLUSION: Improved care, including oxygen delivery and monitoring, for preterm babies in all facility settings would reduce the number of babies affected with ROP. Improved data tracking and coverage of locally adapted screening/treatment programs are urgently required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vos, T., Flaxman, A. D., Naghavi, M., Lozano, R., Michaud, C., Ezzati, M., Shibuya, K., Salomon, J. A., Abdalla, S., Aboyans, V., et al. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61729-2 · Cited by 8,291
Self-citation
Cited by
Liu, L., Oza, S., Hogan, D., Perin, J., Rudan, I., Lawn, J. E., Cousens, S., Mathers, C., & Black, R. E. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61698-6 · Cited by 3,167
Self-citationEvery Newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival
Lawn, J. E., Blencowe, H., Oza, S., You, D., Lee, A. C., Waiswa, P., Lalli, M., Bhutta, Z., Barros, A. J., Christian, P., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60496-7 · Cited by 1,929
Self-citationRacial and ethnic differences in preterm birth: a complex, multifactorial problem
Manuck, T. A. (2017) · Seminars in Perinatology · doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2017.08.010 · Cited by 334
Lutein Supplementation for Eye Diseases
Li, L. H., Lee, J. C.-Y., Leung, H. H., Lam, W. C., Fu, Z., & Lo, A. C. Y. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12061721 · Cited by 152
Xu, M., Fan, R., Fan, X., Shao, Y., & Li, X. (2022) · Drug Design, Development and Therapy · doi:10.2147/dddt.s383101 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Blencowe, H., Lawn, J. E., Vazquez, T., Fielder, A., & Gilbert, C.
- Venue
- Pediatric Research
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 35-49
- ISSN
- 0031-3998 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-0447
- OpenAlex
- W1970865674
- Cited by
- 792
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preterm-associated visual impairment and estimates of retinopathy of prematurity at regional and global levels for 2010. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/pr.2013.205
- The paper
- Blencowe, H., Lawn, J. E., Vazquez, T., Fielder, A., & Gilbert, C. (2013). Preterm-associated visual impairment and estimates of retinopathy of prematurity at regional and global levels for 2010. Pediatric Research. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2013.205
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.