Cited by 111Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchTreatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Dose-related effects of ketamine for antidepressant-resistant symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder in veterans and active duty military: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled multi-center clinical trial

Open access
Abdallah, Chadi G., Roache, John D., Gueorguieva, Ralitza, Averill, Lynnette A., Young-McCaughan, Stacey, Shiroma, Paulo R., Purohit, Prerana, Brundige, Antoinette +24 more·2022·Neuropsychopharmacology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

This study tested the efficacy of repeated intravenous ketamine doses to reduce symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Veterans and service members with PTSD (n = 158) who failed previous antidepressant treatment were randomized to 8 infusions administered twice weekly of intravenous placebo (n = 54), low dose (0.2 mg/kg; n = 53) or standard dose (0.5 mg/kg; n = 51) ketamine. Participants were assessed at baseline, during treatment, and for 4 weeks after their last infusion. Primary analyses used mixed effects models. The primary outcome measure was the self-report PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), and secondary outcome measures were the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) and the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). There were no significant group-by-time interactions for PTSD symptoms measured by the PCL-5 or CAPS-5. The standard ketamine dose ameliorated depression measured by the MADRS significantly more than placebo. Ketamine produced dose-related dissociative and psychotomimetic effects, which returned to baseline within 2 h and were less pronounced with repeated administration. There was no evidence of differential treatment discontinuation by ketamine dose, consistent with good tolerability. This clinical trial failed to find a significant dose-related effect of ketamine on PTSD symptoms. Secondary analyses suggested that the standard dose exerted rapid antidepressant effects. Further studies are needed to determine the role of ketamine in PTSD treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02655692.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41386-022-01266-9

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, repeat-dose ketamine (eight infusions twice weekly) had no effect on PTSD-associated symptoms in 158 individuals with treatment-resistant PTSD.

    “a recent, randomized, placebo-controlled (saline), multicenter clinical trial found that repeat-dose ketamine (eight infusions, given twice per week) had no effect on PTSD-associated symptoms in 158 individuals with treatment-resistant PTSD”

    From Ketamine in neuropsychiatric disorders: an update (2024) · cites this paper as [104]

    The Abstract describes 158 veterans and service members who had not responded to previous antidepressant treatment, randomized to eight twice-weekly infusions of ketamine or placebo. It reports no significant difference between groups in PTSD symptom outcomes, and the Discussion says ketamine failed to demonstrate significant efficacy compared with placebo. That does not establish that ketamine had *no effect* on PTSD symptoms; the claim states the null finding too categorically. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Placebo response rates are high in depression and suicidality research, as well as in trials with rapid-acting antidepressants.

    “placebo response rates are high in depression and suicidality research, as well in trials with rapid-acting antidepressants [104]”

    From Ketamine in neuropsychiatric disorders: an update (2024) · cites this paper as [104]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports an unexpectedly large placebo effect in this ketamine trial and says high placebo response is not uncommon in the field. The trial studied PTSD symptoms in veterans and active-duty military personnel; these passages do not establish high placebo response rates specifically in depression or suicidality research, or across rapid-acting antidepressant trials generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In that trial, repeat-dose ketamine significantly decreased depressive symptoms.

    “however, repeat-dose ketamine significantly decreased depressive symptoms [104]”

    From Ketamine in neuropsychiatric disorders: an update (2024) · cites this paper as [104]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdallah, C. G., Roache, J. D., Gueorguieva, R., Averill, L. A., Young-McCaughan, S., Shiroma, P. R., Purohit, P., Brundige, A., Murff, W., Ahn, K.-H., Sherif, M. A., Baltutis, E. J., Ranganathan, M., D’Souza, D., Martini, B., Southwick, S. M., Petrakis, I. L., Burson, R. R., Guthmiller, K. B., López-Roca, A. L., Lautenschlager, K. A., McCallin, J. P., Hoch, M. B., Timchenko, A., Souza, S. E., Bryant, C. E., Mintz, J., Litz, B. T., Williamson, D. E., Keane, T. M., Peterson, A. L., & Krystal, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Brooke Army Medical Center (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Durham VA Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
Abdallah, Chadi G.
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2022-01-19
Volume
47
Issue
8
Pages
1574-1581
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W4226063380
Cited by
111
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
FWCI
20.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-13-2-0065)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
ketamine, post-traumatic stress disorder, antidepressant-resistant depression, dose-response relationship, intravenous infusion, veterans, military personnel, dissociative effects, psychotomimetic effects, treatment tolerability, rapid antidepressant effects
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Ketamine, Military Personnel, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review