CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 302interferon and immune responsesSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchVirology and Viral Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) membrane (M) protein inhibits type I and III interferon production by targeting RIG-I/MDA-5 signaling

Open access
Zheng, Yi, Zhuang, Meng-Wei, Han, Lulu, Zhang, Jing, Nan, Mei-Ling, Zhan, Peng, Kang, Dongwei, Liu, Xinyong, Gao, Chengjiang, Wang, Pei-Hui·2020·Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
DOI 10.1038/s41392-020-00438-7PMC PMC7768267

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has quickly spread worldwide and has affected more than 10 million individuals. A typical feature of COVID-19 is the suppression of type I and III interferon (IFN)-mediated antiviral immunity. However, the molecular mechanism by which SARS-CoV-2 evades antiviral immunity remains elusive. Here, we reported that the SARS-CoV-2 membrane (M) protein inhibits the production of type I and III IFNs induced by the cytosolic dsRNA-sensing pathway mediated by RIG-I/MDA-5-MAVS signaling. In addition, the SARS-CoV-2 M protein suppresses type I and III IFN induction stimulated by SeV infection or poly (I:C) transfection. Mechanistically, the SARS-CoV-2 M protein interacts with RIG-I, MAVS, and TBK1, thus preventing the formation of the multiprotein complex containing RIG-I, MAVS, TRAF3, and TBK1 and subsequently impeding the phosphorylation, nuclear translocation, and activation of IRF3. Consequently, ectopic expression of the SARS-CoV-2 M protein facilitates the replication of vesicular stomatitis virus. Taken together, these results indicate that the SARS-CoV-2 M protein antagonizes type I and III IFN production by targeting RIG-I/MDA-5 signaling, which subsequently attenuates antiviral immunity and enhances viral replication. This study provides insight into the interpretation of SARS-CoV-2-induced antiviral immune suppression and illuminates the pathogenic mechanism of COVID-19.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41392-020-00438-7

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 The SARS-CoV-2 M protein inhibits the induction of IFN-β, IFN-λ1, ISG56, and CXCL10 by SeV infection and poly (I:C) transfection. HEK293T cells cultured in 24-well plates (0.8–1 × 105 cells per well) were transfected with pcDNA6B empty vector (E.V., 500 ng) or the SCV2-M plasmid (500 ng). Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were stimulated by SeV infection (a) or poly (I:C) transfection (b) as indicated, and at 9 and 12 h after stimulation, the cells were harvested for RNA extraction and subsequent RT-qPCR analysis. Three independent biological replicates were analyzed, the results of one representative experiment are shown, and the error bars indicate the SD values. Statistical significance is shown as indicated. SARS-CoV-2 M protein SCV2-M; hours h
Fig. 1 The SARS-CoV-2 M protein inhibits the induction of IFN-β, IFN-λ1, ISG56, and CXCL10 by SeV infection and poly (I:C) transfection. HEK293T cells cultured in 24-well plates (0.8–1 × 105 cells per well) were transfected with pcDNA6B empty vector (E.V., 500 ng) or the SCV2-M plasmid (500 ng). Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were stimulated by SeV infection (a) or poly (I:C) transfection (b) as indicated, and at 9 and 12 h after stimulation, the cells were harvested for RNA extraction and subsequent RT-qPCR analysis. Three independent biological replicates were analyzed, the results of one representative experiment are shown, and the error bars indicate the SD values. Statistical significance is shown as indicated. SARS-CoV-2 M protein SCV2-M; hours hCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 The SARS-CoV-2 M protein suppresses the activation of the luciferase reporters of type I and III IFNs and ISGs. The pcDNA6B empty vector and the SARS-CoV-2 M protein plasmids (100 ng) were transfected with the indicated combinations of plasmids expressing RIG-IN (100 ng), MDA-5 (100 ng), TBK1 (100 ng), IKKε (100 ng), IRF3-5D (100 ng, an active form of IRF3), TRIF (100 ng, component of TLR3-TRIF pathway), or STING (100 ng, component of cGAS-STING pathway) into HEK293T cells cultured in 48-well plates (0.5 × 105 cells per well). The IFN-β-Luc (45 ng, the IFN-β luciferase reporter) (a), IFN-λ1-Luc (45 ng, the IFN-λ1 luciferase reporter) (b), or ISRE-Luc (45 ng, the IFN-stimulated response element luciferase reporter) (c) plasmids were also transfected to assess the activation of type I IFNs, type III IFNs, or ISGs, respectively. The pRL-TK (5 ng) was transfected into each well as an internal control. The pcDNA6B empty vector was used to normalize the total amount of transfected plasmid DNA. Dual‐luciferase assays were performed 36 h after transfection. d The pcDNA6B empty vector and the SARS-CoV-2 M protein plasmids (100 ng) were transfected into HEK293T cells as indicated. Twenty-four hours later, the cells were treated with recombinant human IFN-β (10 ng/mL) or IFN-λ1 (10 ng/mL). Three hours after simulation, the cells were harvested for RNA extraction and subsequent RT-qPCR analysis. Three independent biological replicates were analyzed, the results of one representative experiment are shown, and the error bars indicate the SD values. Statistical significance is shown as indicated. SARS-CoV-2 M protein SCV2-M
Fig. 2 The SARS-CoV-2 M protein suppresses the activation of the luciferase reporters of type I and III IFNs and ISGs. The pcDNA6B empty vector and the SARS-CoV-2 M protein plasmids (100 ng) were transfected with the indicated combinations of plasmids expressing RIG-IN (100 ng), MDA-5 (100 ng), TBK1 (100 ng), IKKε (100 ng), IRF3-5D (100 ng, an active form of IRF3), TRIF (100 ng, component of TLR3-TRIF pathway), or STING (100 ng, component of cGAS-STING pathway) into HEK293T cells cultured in 48-well plates (0.5 × 105 cells per well). The IFN-β-Luc (45 ng, the IFN-β luciferase reporter) (a), IFN-λ1-Luc (45 ng, the IFN-λ1 luciferase reporter) (b), or ISRE-Luc (45 ng, the IFN-stimulated response element luciferase reporter) (c) plasmids were also transfected to assess the activation of type I IFNs, type III IFNs, or ISGs, respectively. The pRL-TK (5 ng) was transfected into each well as an internal control. The pcDNA6B empty vector was used to normalize the total amount of transfected plasmid DNA. Dual‐luciferase assays were performed 36 h after transfection. d The pcDNA6B empty vector and the SARS-CoV-2 M protein plasmids (100 ng) were transfected into HEK293T cells as indicated. Twenty-four hours later, the cells were treated with recombinant human IFN-β (10 ng/mL) or IFN-λ1 (10 ng/mL). Three hours after simulation, the cells were harvested for RNA extraction and subsequent RT-qPCR analysis. Three independent biological replicates were analyzed, the results of one representative experiment are shown, and the error bars indicate the SD values. Statistical significance is shown as indicated. SARS-CoV-2 M protein SCV2-MCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Subcellular localization of the SARS-CoV-2 M protein. HeLa cells seeded on coverslips in 12-well plates were transfected with the indicated plasmids. Twenty hours later, the cells were fixed, blocked, and then incubated with a rabbit anti-Flag antibody and a mouse antibody against the corresponding organelle marker or the indicated protein (a). HeLa cells in (b) were infected with SeV as indicated for 8 h before fixation, blocking and antibody incubation. Subsequently, the proteins were stained with a fluorescence-labeled secondary antibody. MDA-5 was visualized with a mCherry tag. (Right) Intensity profiles of SARS-CoV-2 M protein (Flag-M) and indicated proteins along the plotted lines, as analyzed by Image J line scan analysis. Nucleus were visualized with DAPI (blue). Confocal imaging results are representative of two independent experiments. Scale bar, 10 μm. MitoRed, mitochondria marker; Calnexin, ER marker; CM130, Golgi marker
Fig. 3 Subcellular localization of the SARS-CoV-2 M protein. HeLa cells seeded on coverslips in 12-well plates were transfected with the indicated plasmids. Twenty hours later, the cells were fixed, blocked, and then incubated with a rabbit anti-Flag antibody and a mouse antibody against the corresponding organelle marker or the indicated protein (a). HeLa cells in (b) were infected with SeV as indicated for 8 h before fixation, blocking and antibody incubation. Subsequently, the proteins were stained with a fluorescence-labeled secondary antibody. MDA-5 was visualized with a mCherry tag. (Right) Intensity profiles of SARS-CoV-2 M protein (Flag-M) and indicated proteins along the plotted lines, as analyzed by Image J line scan analysis. Nucleus were visualized with DAPI (blue). Confocal imaging results are representative of two independent experiments. Scale bar, 10 μm. MitoRed, mitochondria marker; Calnexin, ER marker; CM130, Golgi markerCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 The SARS-CoV-2 M protein interacts with RIG-I (a), MDA-5 (b), MAVS (c), and TBK1 (d) but not with IRF3 (e). f The truncated variants of SARS-CoV-2 M protein are depicted. g–i The interaction of RIG-I, MAVS, and TBK1 with the truncated variants of SARS-CoV-2 M protein. The HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids for 24 h before coimmunoprecipitation with the anti-Flag magnetic beads. The pcDNA6B empty vector was used to balance the total amount of plasmid DNA in the transfection. The input and immunoprecipitates were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. Immunoblotting results are representative of two independent experiments. SARS-CoV-2 M protein, SCV2-M
Fig. 4 The SARS-CoV-2 M protein interacts with RIG-I (a), MDA-5 (b), MAVS (c), and TBK1 (d) but not with IRF3 (e). f The truncated variants of SARS-CoV-2 M protein are depicted. g–i The interaction of RIG-I, MAVS, and TBK1 with the truncated variants of SARS-CoV-2 M protein. The HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids for 24 h before coimmunoprecipitation with the anti-Flag magnetic beads. The pcDNA6B empty vector was used to balance the total amount of plasmid DNA in the transfection. The input and immunoprecipitates were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. Immunoblotting results are representative of two independent experiments. SARS-CoV-2 M protein, SCV2-MCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 The SARS-CoV-2 M protein prevents the formation of the RIG-I–MAVS–TRAF3–TBK1 multiprotein complex. The SARS-CoV-2 M protein inhibits the RIG-I–MAVS (a), MAVS–TBK1 (c), and TRAF3–TBK1 (d) but not MDA-5–MAVS (b) interactions. The HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids for 24 h before coimmunoprecipitation with the antibodies against MAVS (a and b) or TBK1 (c and d). The pcDNA6B empty vector was used to balance the total amount of plasmid DNA in the transfection. The input and immunoprecipitates were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. Immunoblotting results are representative of two independent experiments. SARS-CoV-2 M protein, SCV2-M
Fig. 5 The SARS-CoV-2 M protein prevents the formation of the RIG-I–MAVS–TRAF3–TBK1 multiprotein complex. The SARS-CoV-2 M protein inhibits the RIG-I–MAVS (a), MAVS–TBK1 (c), and TRAF3–TBK1 (d) but not MDA-5–MAVS (b) interactions. The HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids for 24 h before coimmunoprecipitation with the antibodies against MAVS (a and b) or TBK1 (c and d). The pcDNA6B empty vector was used to balance the total amount of plasmid DNA in the transfection. The input and immunoprecipitates were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. Immunoblotting results are representative of two independent experiments. SARS-CoV-2 M protein, SCV2-MCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 6 The SARS-CoV-2 M protein suppresses the phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of IRF3. a The SARS-CoV-2 M protein affects the phosphorylation of IRF3 upon SeV infection. HeLa cells seeded in six-well plates were transfected with the empty vector or Flag-tagged SARS-CoV-2 M protein plasmids for 20 h before infection with SeV (50 HA/mL). At the indicated time points, the cells were harvested and processed for immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. b The SARS-CoV-2 M protein prevents the nuclear translocation of IRF3. HeLa cells seeded on coverslips in 12-well plates were transfected with the Flag empty vector or Flag-tagged SARS-CoV-2 M protein plasmids for 20 h before infection with SeV. After infection for 8 h, the coverslips were removed and processed for immunofluorescence staining with the mouse anti-Flag antibody and a rabbit anti-IRF3 antibody. Scale bar, 10 μm. c Quantification of the percentage of IRF3 in the nucleus upon SeV infection. IRF3 molecules in the nuclei in 50 cells per group were counted, and percentages were calculated. Experiments were performed in triplicate and calculated as the means ± SD. Immunoblotting (a) and confocal imaging (b) results are representative of two independent experiments. Empty vector EV, SARS-CoV-2 M protein SCV2-M, hours h
Fig. 6 The SARS-CoV-2 M protein suppresses the phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of IRF3. a The SARS-CoV-2 M protein affects the phosphorylation of IRF3 upon SeV infection. HeLa cells seeded in six-well plates were transfected with the empty vector or Flag-tagged SARS-CoV-2 M protein plasmids for 20 h before infection with SeV (50 HA/mL). At the indicated time points, the cells were harvested and processed for immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. b The SARS-CoV-2 M protein prevents the nuclear translocation of IRF3. HeLa cells seeded on coverslips in 12-well plates were transfected with the Flag empty vector or Flag-tagged SARS-CoV-2 M protein plasmids for 20 h before infection with SeV. After infection for 8 h, the coverslips were removed and processed for immunofluorescence staining with the mouse anti-Flag antibody and a rabbit anti-IRF3 antibody. Scale bar, 10 μm. c Quantification of the percentage of IRF3 in the nucleus upon SeV infection. IRF3 molecules in the nuclei in 50 cells per group were counted, and percentages were calculated. Experiments were performed in triplicate and calculated as the means ± SD. Immunoblotting (a) and confocal imaging (b) results are representative of two independent experiments. Empty vector EV, SARS-CoV-2 M protein SCV2-M, hours hCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 7 The SARS-CoV-2 M protein facilitates viral replication. The HEK293T cells were transfected with plasmids as indicated. Twenty-four hours later, the cells were infected with VSV-eGFP (MOI = 0.001). Twelve hours after infection, GFP-positive cells were visualized and analyzed with flow cytometry (a), and the culture supernatant (20 h post-infection) was collected for plaque assays to measure the titer of extracellular VSV-eGFP (PFU/mL) (b). Confocal imaging and flow cytometry results are representative of two independent experiments. Scale bar, 50 μm. Three independent biological replicates were analyzed (a); the results of one representative experiment are shown, and the error bars indicate the SD value. The statistical significance is shown as indicated. c The replication of intracellular VSV-eGFP in the cell lysate (20 h post-infection) was determined by immunoblotting using an anti-GFP antibody. Empty vector EV; SARS-CoV-2 M protein SCV2-M
Fig. 7 The SARS-CoV-2 M protein facilitates viral replication. The HEK293T cells were transfected with plasmids as indicated. Twenty-four hours later, the cells were infected with VSV-eGFP (MOI = 0.001). Twelve hours after infection, GFP-positive cells were visualized and analyzed with flow cytometry (a), and the culture supernatant (20 h post-infection) was collected for plaque assays to measure the titer of extracellular VSV-eGFP (PFU/mL) (b). Confocal imaging and flow cytometry results are representative of two independent experiments. Scale bar, 50 μm. Three independent biological replicates were analyzed (a); the results of one representative experiment are shown, and the error bars indicate the SD value. The statistical significance is shown as indicated. c The replication of intracellular VSV-eGFP in the cell lysate (20 h post-infection) was determined by immunoblotting using an anti-GFP antibody. Empty vector EV; SARS-CoV-2 M protein SCV2-MCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Zheng, Y., Zhuang, M.-W., Han, L., Zhang, J., Nan, M.-L., Zhan, P., Kang, D., Liu, X., Gao, C., & Wang, P.-H.
Affiliations
Shandong University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Gao, Chengjiang
  • Wang, Pei-Hui
ORCID
Venue
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-12-28
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
299-299
ISSN
2059-3635 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/s41392-020-00438-7
PMC
PMC7768267
OpenAlex
W3115832826
Cited by
302
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 1
FWCI
20.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Shandong University (2020XGB03)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81525012, 81930039, 31730026, 81901604, COVID-19)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018M642662)
  • Government of Jiangsu Province
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (SBK2020042706)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, membrane proteins, interferon evasion, type I interferon, interferon lambda, RIG-I, MDA5, MAVS, TBK1, IRF3, vesicular stomatitis virus, poly(I:C), viral replication
MeSH terms
DEAD Box Protein 58, Interferon-Induced Helicase, IFIH1, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Coronavirus M Proteins, Interferon Lambda, Animals, Chlorocebus aethiops, HeLa Cells, Humans, Interferon Type I, Interferons, Receptors, Immunologic, Vero Cells, Viral Matrix Proteins, Signal Transduction, HEK293 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review