Cited by 285CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringCancer-related Molecular PathwaysChromatin Remodeling and Cancer

Cas9 activates the p53 pathway and selects for p53-inactivating mutations

Open access
Enache, Oana M., Rendo, Veronica, Abdusamad, Mai, Lam, Daniel, Davison, Desiree, Pal, Sangita, Currimjee, Naomi, Hess, Julian +8 more·2020·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Cas9 is commonly introduced into cell lines to enable CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing. Here, we studied the genetic and transcriptional consequences of Cas9 expression itself. Gene expression profiling of 165 pairs of human cancer cell lines and their Cas9-expressing derivatives revealed upregulation of the p53 pathway upon introduction of Cas9, specifically in wild-type TP53 (TP53-WT) cell lines. This was confirmed at the messenger RNA and protein levels. Moreover, elevated levels of DNA repair were observed in Cas9-expressing cell lines. Genetic characterization of 42 cell line pairs showed that introduction of Cas9 can lead to the emergence and expansion of p53-inactivating mutations. This was confirmed by competition experiments in isogenic TP53-WT and TP53-null (TP53-/-) cell lines. Lastly, Cas9 was less active in TP53-WT than in TP53-mutant cell lines, and Cas9-induced p53 pathway activation affected cellular sensitivity to both genetic and chemical perturbations. These findings may have broad implications for the proper use of CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41588-020-0623-4

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In primary human hepatocytes, therapeutic concentrations of NTLA-2001 showed no evidence of previously described off-target mutagenesis mechanisms.

    “In primary human hepatocytes, therapeutic concentrations of NTLA-2001 showed no evidence of previously described off-target mutagenesis mechanisms. 33,34”

    From CRISPR-Cas9 In Vivo Gene Editing for Transthyretin Amyloidosis (2021) · cites this paper as [34]

    The paper’s Abstract (page not available in our copy) describes a previously observed Cas9-associated mechanism: the emergence and expansion of p53-inactivating mutations in human cancer cell lines. It does not test NTLA-2001 in primary human hepatocytes or establish that therapeutic concentrations show no evidence of that mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Enache, O. M., Rendo, V., Abdusamad, M., Lam, D., Davison, D., Pal, S., Currimjee, N., Hess, J., Pantel, S., Nag, A., Thorner, A. R., Doench, J. G., Vazquez, F., Beroukhim, R., Golub, T. R., & Ben-David, U.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2020-05-18
Volume
52
Issue
7
Pages
662-668
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W3024591577
Cited by
285
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 17
FWCI
13.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA018828)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA219943, R01CA215489, K08CA122833, R01CA188228)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Keywords
Cas9, p53 pathway, TP53 mutation, CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, off-target effects, DNA repair, DNA damage, cancer cell lines
MeSH terms
CRISPR-Associated Protein 9, DNA Mutational Analysis, Humans, Mutation, Streptococcus pyogenes, Transcription, Genetic, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Cell Line, Tumor, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review