The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of failure: unsuccessful bacterial invasions steer the soil microbial community away from the invader’s niche
Open accessAbstract
Although many environments like soils are constantly subjected to invasion by alien microbes, invaders usually fail to succeed, succumbing to the robust diversity often found in nature. So far, only successful invasions have been explored, and it remains unknown to what extent an unsuccessful invasion can impact resident communities. Here we hypothesized that unsuccessful invasions can cause impacts to soil functioning by decreasing the diversity and niche breadth of resident bacterial communities, which could cause shifts to community composition and niche structure—an effect that is likely exacerbated when diversity is compromised. To examine this question, diversity gradients of soil microbial communities were subjected to invasion by the frequent, yet oft-unsuccessful soil invader, Escherichia coli, and evaluated for changes to diversity, bacterial community composition, niche breadth, and niche structure. Contrary to expectations, diversity and niche breadth increased across treatments upon invasion. Community composition and niche structure were also altered, with shifts of niche structure revealing an escape by the resident community away from the invader’s resources. Importantly, the extent of the escape varied in response to the community’s diversity, where less diverse communities experienced larger shifts. Thus, although transient and unsuccessful, the invader competed for resources with resident species and caused tangible impacts that modified both the diversity and functioning of resident communities, which can likely generate a legacy effect that influences future invasion attempts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invaded communities
Hejda, M., Pyšek, P., & Jarošík, V. (2009) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01480.x · Cited by 1,172
Realistic species losses disproportionately reduce grassland resistance to biological invaders
Zavaleta, E. S., & Hulvey, K. B. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1102643 · Cited by 366
Cited by
Soil microbial inoculants for sustainable agriculture: Limitations and opportunities
O'Callaghan, M., Ballard, R. A., & Wright, D. (2022) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/sum.12811 · Cited by 489
Microbiome Engineering: Synthetic Biology of Plant-Associated Microbiomes in Sustainable Agriculture
Ke, J., Wang, B., & Yoshikuni, Y. (2021) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.07.008 · Cited by 406
Inoculated microbial consortia perform better than single strains in living soil: A meta-analysis
Liu, X., Mei, S., & Salles, J. F. (2023) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.105011 · Cited by 236
Self-citationBottom-Up Approaches to Synthetic Cooperation in Microbial Communities
Rodríguez Amor, D., & Dal Bello, M. (2019) · Life · doi:10.3390/life9010022 · Cited by 71
Chen, X., Zhou, X., Geng, P., Zeng, Y., Hu, F., Sun, P., Zhuang, G., & Ma, A. (2023) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2023.146142 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Mallon, C. A., Le Roux, X., van Doorn, G. S., Dini-Andreote, F., Poly, F., & Salles, J. F.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-01-26
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 728-741
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W2787149750
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of failure: unsuccessful bacterial invasions steer the soil microbial community away from the invader’s niche. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41396-017-0003-y
- The paper
- Mallon, C. A., Le Roux, X., van Doorn, G. S., Dini-Andreote, F., Poly, F., & Salles, J. F. (2018). The impact of failure: unsuccessful bacterial invasions steer the soil microbial community away from the invader’s niche. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-017-0003-y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.