The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Novel phosphate-solubilizing bacteria enhance soil phosphorus cycling following ecological restoration of land degraded by mining
Open accessAbstract
Little is known about the changes in soil microbial phosphorus (P) cycling potential during terrestrial ecosystem management and restoration, although much research aims to enhance soil P cycling. Here, we used metagenomic sequencing to analyse 18 soil microbial communities at a P-deficient degraded mine site in southern China where ecological restoration was implemented using two soil ameliorants and eight plant species. Our results show that the relative abundances of key genes governing soil microbial P-cycling potential were higher at the restored site than at the unrestored site, indicating enhancement of soil P cycling following restoration. The gcd gene, encoding an enzyme that mediates inorganic P solubilization, was predominant across soil samples and was a major determinant of bioavailable soil P. We reconstructed 39 near-complete bacterial genomes harboring gcd, which represented diverse novel phosphate-solubilizing microbial taxa. Strong correlations were found between the relative abundance of these genomes and bioavailable soil P, suggesting their contributions to the enhancement of soil P cycling. Moreover, 84 mobile genetic elements were detected in the scaffolds containing gcd in the 39 genomes, providing evidence for the role of phage-related horizontal gene transfer in assisting soil microbes to acquire new metabolic potential related to P cycling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput
Edgar, R. C. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh340 · Cited by 44,662
RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies
Stamatakis, A. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 · Cited by 32,291
vegan: Community Ecology Package
Oksanen, J., Simpson, G. L., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O'Hara, R. B., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., Szoecs, E., et al. (2001) · CRAN: Contributed Packages · doi:10.32614/cran.package.vegan · Cited by 22,615
A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters
Murphy, J., & Riley, J. P. (1962) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0003-2670(00)88444-5 · Cited by 21,093
Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND
Buchfink, B., Xie, C., & Huson, D. H. (2015) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3176 · Cited by 14,201
trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses
Capella-Gutiérrez, S., Silla-Martínez, J. M., & Gabaldón, T. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348 · Cited by 12,751
Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification
Hyatt, D., Chen, G.-L., LoCascio, P. F., Land, M. L., Larimer, F. W., & Hauser, L. J. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-119 · Cited by 12,587
Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P., & Tyson, G. W. (2015) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.186072.114 · Cited by 12,496
Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees
Miller, M. A., Pfeiffer, W., & Schwartz, T. (2010) · 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE) · doi:10.1109/gce.2010.5676129 · Cited by 11,228
Cited by
Elhaissoufi, W., Ghoulam, C., Barakat, A., Zeroual, Y., & Bargaz, A. (2022) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2021.08.014 · Cited by 298
Deciphering Trifolium pratense L. holobiont reveals a microbiome resilient to future climate changes
Wahdan, S. F. M., Tanunchai, B., Wu, Y., Sansupa, C., Schädler, M., Dawoud, T. M., Buscot, F., & Purahong, W. (2021) · MicrobiologyOpen · doi:10.1002/mbo3.1217 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Liang, J.-L., Liu, J., Jia, P., Yang, T.-T., Zeng, Q.-W., Zhang, S.-C., Liao, B., Shu, W.-S., & Li, J.-T.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-03-23
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1600-1613
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W3012647466
- Cited by
- 527
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 30.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Novel phosphate-solubilizing bacteria enhance soil phosphorus cycling following ecological restoration of land degraded by mining. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41396-020-0632-4
- The paper
- Liang, J.-L., Liu, J., Jia, P., Yang, T.-T., Zeng, Q.-W., Zhang, S.-C., Liao, B., Shu, W.-S., & Li, J.-T. (2020). Novel phosphate-solubilizing bacteria enhance soil phosphorus cycling following ecological restoration of land degraded by mining. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-020-0632-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.