Cited by 30Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Novel Alzheimer’s disease risk variants identified based on whole-genome sequencing of APOE ε4 carriers

Open access
Park, Jong-Ho, Park, Inho, Youm, Emilia Moonkyung, Lee, Sejoon, Park, June-Hee, Lee, Jongan, Lee, Dong Young, Byun, Min Soo +19 more·2021·Translational Psychiatry

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease associated with a complex genetic etiology. Besides the apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE ε4) allele, a few dozen other genetic loci associated with AD have been identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducted mainly in individuals of European ancestry. Recently, several GWAS performed in other ethnic groups have shown the importance of replicating studies that identify previously established risk loci and searching for novel risk loci. APOE-stratified GWAS have yielded novel AD risk loci that might be masked by, or be dependent on, APOE alleles. We performed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) on DNA from blood samples of 331 AD patients and 169 elderly controls of Korean ethnicity who were APOE ε4 carriers. Based on WGS data, we designed a customized AD chip (cAD chip) for further analysis on an independent set of 543 AD patients and 894 elderly controls of the same ethnicity, regardless of their APOE ε4 allele status. Combined analysis of WGS and cAD chip data revealed that SNPs rs1890078 (P = 6.64E−07) and rs12594991 (P = 2.03E−07) in SORCS1 and CHD2 genes, respectively, are novel genetic variants among APOE ε4 carriers in the Korean population. In addition, nine possible novel variants that were rare in individuals of European ancestry but common in East Asia were identified. This study demonstrates that APOE-stratified analysis is important for understanding the genetic background of AD in different populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41398-021-01412-9

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Park et al. also identified nine suggestive variants, including two SNPs located around SORCS1 that were present only in APOE ε4 carriers.

    “The authors also analyzed samples from 874 AD patients and 1063 healthy subjects, including the APOE ε4 carriers described above, and identified nine suggestive variants. These included two SNPs located around SORCS1, which were present only in ε4 carriers.”

    From Genetics of Alzheimer’s disease: An East Asian perspective (2023) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Results section on the cAD chip application set reports nine AD-associated SNPs, including two intergenic SNPs between SORCS1 and LINC01435. But the same section says the association of those two SNPs with AD was observed regardless of APOE ε4 status, not only in carriers. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Park et al. identified rs1890078 located 54 kb upstream of SORCS1 and rs12594991 located in the intron of CHD2 in APOE ε4 carriers.

    “Two SNPs were identified in this analysis: rs1890078, located 54 kb upstream of SORCS1, and rs12594991, located in the intron of CHD2.”

    From Genetics of Alzheimer’s disease: An East Asian perspective (2023) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Results section, “Novel variants associated with AD in APOE ε4 carriers” (page unavailable), identifies both SNPs in APOE ε4 carriers and places rs12594991 in a CHD2 intron. It describes rs1890078 as intergenic between SORCS1 and LINC01435, but does not establish that it is 54 kb upstream of SORCS1. The approximately 55 kb distance reported elsewhere in Results is between rs1890078 and a different SNP. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. [1]Holtzman D. M., Morris J. C. & Goate A. M. Alzheimer’s disease: the challenge of the second century. Sci. Transl. Med.3, 77sr71 (2011). PMC3130546 21471435
  2. [3]Alzheimer’s Association Report. Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement.16, 391–460 10.1002/alz.12068 (2020). 32157811 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [4]Kim, K. W. et al. A nationwide survey on the prevalence of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in South Korea. J. Alzheimers Dis. 23, 281–291 (2011). 21178286 · DOI
  4. [5]Cuyvers, E. & Sleegers, K. Genetic variations underlying Alzheimer’s disease: evidence from genome-wide association studies and beyond. Lancet Neurol. 15, 857–868 (2016). 27302364 · DOI
  5. [6]Gatz, M. et al. Role of genes and environments for explaining Alzheimer disease. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 63, 168–174 (2006). 16461860 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [7]Van Cauwenberghe, C., Van Broeckhoven, C. & Sleegers, K. The genetic landscape of Alzheimer disease: clinical implications and perspectives. Genet. Med. 18, 421–430 (2016). 26312828 PMC4857183 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [8]Lambert, J. C. et al. Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 45, 1452–1458 (2013). 24162737 PMC3896259 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [9]Jansen, I. E. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new loci and functional pathways influencing Alzheimer’s disease risk. Nat. Genet. 51, 404–413 (2019). 30617256 PMC6836675 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [10]Kunkle, B. W. et al. Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Abeta, tau, immunity and lipid processing. Nat. Genet. 51, 414–430 (2019). 30820047 PMC6463297 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [11]Andrews, S. J., Fulton-Howard, B. & Goate, A. Interpretation of risk loci from genome-wide association studies of Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 19, 326–335 (2020). 31986256 PMC8176461 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [13]Reitz, C. et al. Variants in the ATP-binding cassette transporter (ABCA7), apolipoprotein E 4,and the risk of late-onset Alzheimer disease in African Americans. JAMA 309, 1483–1492 (2013). 23571587 PMC3667653 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [14]Meng, Y. et al. Association of polymorphisms in the Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene with Alzheimer disease in an Israeli Arab community. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 78, 871–877 (2006). 16642441 PMC1474030 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [16]Morris, J. C. et al. Assessment of racial disparities in biomarkers for Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 76, 264–273 (2019). 30615028 PMC6439726 · DOI
  14. [17]Jun, G. et al. A novel Alzheimer disease locus located near the gene encoding tau protein. Mol. Psychiatry 21, 108–117 (2016). 25778476 PMC4573764 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [18]Wang, B. et al. A rare variant in MLKL confers susceptibility to ApoE varepsilon4-negative Alzheimer’s disease in Hong Kong Chinese population. Neurobiol Aging 68, 160.e1–160.e7 (2018). 29656768 · DOI
  16. [19]Ma, Y. et al. Analysis of Whole-exome sequencing data for Alzheimer disease stratified by APOE genotype. JAMA Neurol. 76, 1099–1108 (2019). 31180460 PMC6563544 · DOI
  17. [20]Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009). 19451168 PMC2705234 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [21]McKenna, A. et al. The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010). 20644199 PMC2928508 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [22]Wang, K., Li, M. & Hakonarson, H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e164 (2010). 20601685 PMC2938201 · DOI
  20. [23]Lek, M. et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature 536, 285–291 (2016). 27535533 PMC5018207 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [24]Bertram, L., McQueen, M. B., Mullin, K., Blacker, D. & Tanzi, R. E. Systematic meta-analyses of Alzheimer disease genetic association studies: the AlzGene database. Nat. Genet. 39, 17–23 (2007). 17192785 · DOI · Paper page
  22. [25]Welter, D. et al. The NHGRI GWAS Catalog, a curated resource of SNP-trait associations. Nucleic Acids Res 42, D1001–D1006 (2014). 24316577 PMC3965119 · DOI · Paper page
  23. [26]Ward, L. D. & Kellis, M. HaploReg v4: systematic mining of putative causal variants, cell types, regulators and target genes for human complex traits and disease. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D877–D881 (2016). 26657631 PMC4702929 · DOI
  24. [27]Chang, C. C. et al. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience 4, 7 (2015). 25722852 PMC4342193 · DOI · Paper page
  25. [28]Pruim, R. J. et al. LocusZoom: regional visualization of genome-wide association scan results. Bioinformatics 26, 2336–2337 (2010). 20634204 PMC2935401 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [29]Jun, G. R. et al. Transethnic genome-wide scan identifies novel Alzheimer’s disease loci. Alzheimers Dement. 13, 727–738 (2017). 28183528 PMC5496797 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [30]Galizia, E. C. et al. CHD2 variants are a risk factor for photosensitivity in epilepsy. Brain 138, 1198–1207 (2015). 25783594 PMC4407192 · DOI
  28. [31]Carvill, G., Helbig I. & Mefford, H. CHD2-related neurodevelopmental disorders. (ed Adam, M. P. et al.). GeneReviews(R) (1993). 26677509
  29. [32]Kim, Y. J. et al. Chd2 is necessary for neural circuit development and long-term memory. Neuron 100, 1180–1193 e1186 (2018). 30344048 PMC6479120 · DOI
  30. [33]Nieto-Estevez, V. & Hsieh, J. CHD2: one gene, many roles. Neuron 100, 1014–1016 (2018). 30521773 · DOI
  31. [34]Shen, T. J., Ji, F., Yuan, Z. Q. & Jiao, J. W. CHD2 is required for embryonic neurogenesis in the developing cerebral cortex. Stem Cells 33, 1794–1806 (2015). 25786798 · DOI
  32. [35]Westra, H. J. et al. Systematic identification of trans eQTLs as putative drivers of known disease associations. Nat. Genet. 45, 1238–1243 (2013). 24013639 PMC3991562 · DOI · Paper page
  33. [36]Uhlen, M. et al. Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 347, 1260419 (2015). 25613900 · DOI · Paper page
  34. [37]Coulson, E. J. & Andersen, O. M. The A-B-C for SORting APP. J. Neurochemistry 135, 1–3 (2015). 26414457 · DOI
  35. [38]Xu, W. et al. The genetic variation of SORCS1 is associated with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease in Chinese Han population. PLoS ONE 8, e63621 (2013). 23700427 PMC3659081 · DOI
  36. [39]Wang, H. F. et al. SORCS1 and APOE polymorphisms interact to confer risk for late-onset Alzheimer’s disease in a Northern Han Chinese population. Brain Res. 1448, 111–116 (2012). 22353753 · DOI
  37. [40]Floudas, C. S., Um, N., Kamboh, M. I., Barmada, M. M. & Visweswaran, S. Identifying genetic interactions associated with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. BioData Min. 7, 35 (2014). 25649863 PMC4300162 · DOI
  38. [41]Dislich, B. et al. Label-free quantitative proteomics of mouse cerebrospinal fluid detects beta-site APP Cleaving enzyme (BACE1) protease substrates in vivo. Mol. Cell Proteom. 14, 2550–2563 (2015). PMC4597136 26139848 · DOI
  39. [42]Hokama, M. et al. Altered expression of diabetes-related genes in Alzheimer’s disease brains: the Hisayama study. Cereb. Cortex 24, 2476–2488 (2014). 23595620 PMC4128707 · DOI
  40. [43]Oh, D. et al. Regulation of synaptic Rac1 activity, long-term potentiation maintenance, and learning and memory by BCR and ABR Rac GTPase-activating proteins. J. Neurosci. 30, 14134–14144 (2010). 20962234 PMC5076888 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, J.-H., Park, I., Youm, E. M., Lee, S., Park, J.-H., Lee, J., Lee, D. Y., Byun, M. S., Lee, J. H., Yi, D., Chung, S. J., Park, K. W., Choi, N., Kim, S. Y., Yoon, W., An, H., Kim, K. W., Choi, S. H., Jeong, J. H., Kim, E.-J., Kang, H., Lee, J., Kim, Y., Lee, E. A., Seo, S. W., Na, D. L., & Kim, J.-W.
Affiliations
  • Samsung Medical Center (KR)
  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR)
  • Rural Development Administration (KR)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Asan Medical Center (KR)
  • Inha University (KR)
  • Ewha Womans University (KR)
  • Pusan National University Hospital (KR)
  • KISTI National Supercomputing Center (KR)
  • Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Jong-Won
Venue
Translational Psychiatry
Published
2021-05-19
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
296-296
ISSN
2158-3188 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3160456650
Cited by
30
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Translational Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (2014M3C7A1046049, NRF2014M3C7A1046042)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, genetic risk variants, APOE ε4 carriers, SORCS1, CHD2, Korean population, novel genetic loci, rare variants
MeSH terms
Aged, Alleles, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Genotype, Humans, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Apolipoprotein E4, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review