Cited by 34Nutritional Studies and DietNutrition, Genetics, and DiseaseObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Differences in the association of diet quality with body fat distribution between men and women

Open access
Maskarinec, Gertraud, Namatame, Lisa A., Kang, Minji, Buchthal, Steven D., Ernst, Thomas, Monroe, Kristine R., Shepherd, John A., Wilkens, Lynne R. +3 more·2020·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background/objective As dietary intake and endocrine metabolism are vastly different by sex, we evaluated differences in the association of diet quality with body composition between men and women.Subjects/methods Close to 2000 participants from the Multiethnic Cohort completed calibrated quantitative food frequency questionnaires at cohort entry (1993-96) and clinic visit (2013-16), from which the Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2010) was computed. Adiposity measures were obtained through DXA and MRI at clinic visit. Multivariable-adjusted mean adiposity measures were estimated by tertiles of HEI-2010 scores using general linear regression. The associations of diet quality with high visceral fat (VAT) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) were examined by logistic regression. To assess sex differences, cross-product terms with the HEI-2010 were added to the models.Results Mean HEI-2010 scores were higher for women than men at cohort entry (67.4 vs. 64.0) and clinic visit (73.6 vs. 71.0). Past and current diet quality was inversely associated with adiposity measures in men and women. Although interaction terms were not significant, the magnitude of the slopes and differences in adjusted means across tertiles suggested a stronger association for women than men. When comparing individuals who maintained a high vs. poor quality diet over 20 years, women but not men showed significantly lower risks for high VAT, whereas high HEI-2010 scores predicted a lower risk of NAFLD in both sexes.Conclusions The inverse association of diet quality with adiposity was similar in both sexes, but diet quality appeared to have a stronger influence on VAT in women than men.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41430-020-0563-1

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Observational prospective studies show an inverse association of MASLD development with the Mediterranean diet or similar healthy dietary patterns, and a direct association with unhealthy patterns.

    “Observational prospective studies show an inverse association of MASLD development with the Mediterranean diet or similar healthy dietary patterns, 102,103 and a direct association with unhealthy patterns.”

    From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [103]

    The Results (page not available) report that participants with high Healthy Eating Index scores at both assessments were less likely to have NAFLD. The Methods (page not available) specify that NAFLD was measured at the clinic visit, so the study does not establish prospectively observed new cases. It assessed neither the Mediterranean diet specifically nor a distinct unhealthy dietary pattern. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [3]Smiciklas-Wright H, Mitchell DC, Mickle SJ, Cook AJ, Goldman JD. Foods commonly eaten in the United States. US Department of Agriculture NFS report 2002; 965: 1– 264.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maskarinec, G., Namatame, L. A., Kang, M., Buchthal, S. D., Ernst, T., Monroe, K. R., Shepherd, J. A., Wilkens, L. R., Boushey, C. J., Marchand, L. L., & Lim, U.
Affiliations
  • University of Hawaii Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Maskarinec, Gertraud
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2020-01-24
Volume
74
Issue
10
Pages
1434-1441
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W3001290876
Cited by
34
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute (U01CA164973, P30CA071789)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
diet quality, Healthy Eating Index-2010, body fat distribution, visceral fat, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, sex differences, body composition, adiposity, multi-ethnic cohort
MeSH terms
Diet, Healthy, Body Composition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Female, Humans, Male, Adiposity, Body Fat Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review