Cited by 10Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyNutrition and Health in AgingDietetics, Nutrition, and Education

Effect of micronutrient supplementation in addition to nutritional therapy on clinical outcomes of medical inpatients: results of an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Kaegi-Braun, Nina, Germann, Sara, Faessli, Montserrat, Kilchoer, Fiona, Dragusha, Saranda, Tribolet, Pascal, Gomes, Filomena, Bretscher, Céline +4 more·2022·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background There is increasing evidence from randomized controlled trials showing that different types of nutritional support interventions improve clinical outcomes in malnourished medical inpatients. Whether trials using micronutrient supplementation in addition to nutritional therapy are superior to trials without micronutrient supplementation remains unclear. Methods This is a secondary analysis of a systematic search and meta-analysis. We searched Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE electronic database from inception to December 15, 2020, for randomized controlled trials comparing the nutritional support interventions vs. usual care on all-cause mortality (primary endpoint) of medical inpatients with nutritional risk. We stratified trials based on whether or not micronutrient supplementation was used as part of the nutritional strategy. Results We included 23 randomized controlled trials (5 trials with and 18 trials without micronutrient supplementation) with a total of 6745 patients. Overall, mortality was significantly lower in patients receiving nutritional support compared to control group patients with an odds ratio of 0.74 (95% CI 0.59-0.94, p = 0.01). There was no difference between trials with and without micronutrient supplementation on mortality (odds ratio 0.70 (95% CI 0.46-1.08) vs. 0.77 (95% CI 0.57-1.04), I 2 = 0%, p for subgroup difference = 0.73). Similarly, no differences in effect were found regarding non-elective readmissions and length of hospital s…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41430-021-01061-7

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In polymorbid medical inpatients exclusively fed orally, an adequate intake of micronutrients (vitamins and trace elements) to meet daily estimated requirements should be ensured.

    “In polymorbid medical inpatients exclusively fed orally, an adequate intake of micronutrients (vitamins and trace elements) to meet daily estimated requirements should be ensured.”
  • A meta-analysis of mixed study populations found that additional micronutrient supplementation to a therapeutic diet already supplemented in micronutrients did not reduce mortality and may have increased length of stay by approximately one day (borderline statistical significance).

    “For example, a meta-analysis of mixed study populations found additional micronutrient supplementation to a therapeutic diet [74] already supplemented in micronutrients did not reduce mortality and may have increased LOS by approximately one day (albeit with borderline statistical significance) [92].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • ESPEN guideline on nutritional support for polymorbid medical inpatients

    Wunderle, C., Gomes, F., Schuetz, P., Stumpf, F., Austin, P., Ballesteros-Pomar, M. D., Cederholm, T., Fletcher, J., Laviano, A., Norman, K., et al. (2023) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2023.06.023 · Cited by 105 · see citing works

    “…example, a meta-analysis of mixed study populations found additional micronutrient supplementation to a therapeutic diet [74] already supplemented in micronutrients did not reduce mortality and may have increased LOS by approximately one day (albeit with borderline statistical signi fi cance) [92].”
    Self-citation

Authors
Kaegi-Braun, N., Germann, S., Faessli, M., Kilchoer, F., Dragusha, S., Tribolet, P., Gomes, F., Bretscher, C., Deutz, N. E., Stanga, Z., Mueller, B., & Schuetz, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
  • New York Academy of Sciences (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • University of Bern (CH)
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2022-01-20
Volume
76
Issue
7
Pages
964-972
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W4206439988
Cited by
10
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ARBOR - Bern University of Applied Sciences Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (PP00P3_150531)
  • Research Council of the Kantonsspital Aarau
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Keywords
micronutrient supplementation, nutritional therapy, nutritional support, malnutrition, medical inpatients, all-cause mortality, length of hospital stay, nutritional risk
MeSH terms
Humans, Inpatients, Length of Stay, Nutritional Support, Malnutrition, Nutrition Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review