Cited by 171Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

The CaMKII/NMDA receptor complex controls hippocampal synaptic transmission by kinase-dependent and independent mechanisms

Open access
Incontro, Salvatore, Díaz-Alonso, Javier, Iafrati, Jillian, Vieira, Marta, Asensio, Cedric S., Sohal, Vikaas S., Roche, Katherine W., Bender, Kevin J. +1 more·2018·Nature Communications

Abstract

CaMKII is one of the most studied synaptic proteins, but many critical issues regarding its role in synaptic function remain unresolved. Using a CRISPR-based system to delete CaMKII and replace it with mutated forms in single neurons, we have rigorously addressed its various synaptic roles. In brief, basal AMPAR and NMDAR synaptic transmission both require CaMKIIα, but not CaMKIIβ, indicating that, even in the adult, synaptic transmission is determined by the ongoing action of CaMKIIα. While AMPAR transmission requires kinase activity, NMDAR transmission does not, implying a scaffolding role for the CaMKII protein instead. LTP is abolished in the absence of CaMKIIα and/or CaMKIIβ and with an autophosphorylation impaired CaMKIIα (T286A). With the exception of NMDAR synaptic currents, all aspects of CaMKIIα signaling examined require binding to the NMDAR, emphasizing the essential role of this receptor as a master synaptic signaling hub.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-018-04439-7

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both sLTP and LTP are greatly diminished in a CaMKII-dead mutant (K42K or K42M), despite its translocation.

    “In support of these results, both sLTP (379) and LTP (121, 379) are greatly diminished in a CaMKII-dead mutant (K42K or K42M), despite its translocation.”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [121]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says that substantial LTP remained with the CaMKIIα K42R mutation, contrary to the claim that LTP was greatly diminished in the kinase-dead mutant. The Results report loss of long-term sLTP with a different mutant, T286A; they do not establish the claimed sLTP result for K42K or K42M, or its translocation. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Expression of active CaMKII or direct delivery into the cell via the recording electrode has repeatedly revealed a roughly two- to threefold enhancement in the AMPAR EPSC but little change in the NMDAR EPSC.

    “Expression of active CaMKII (121, 130–132, 209, 210, 212) or direct delivery into the cell via the recording electrode (199) has repeatedly revealed a roughly two- to threefold enhancement in the AMPAR EPSC but little change in the NMDAR EPSC (130–132).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [121]

    In Results, ‘CaMKII constitutive activity and the maintenance of LTP’ (Fig. 10; page unavailable), expression of constitutively active CaMKIIα increased AMPAR EPSCs to about 250% of control. The cited passages do not report NMDAR EPSCs for that active-kinase experiment, so they do not establish the claimed little change in NMDAR EPSCs. Direct delivery through a recording electrode is attributed to a different citation in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mutations in the GluN2B CTD that cannot bind CaMKII, or competing constructs, produce highly variable effects on LTP, ranging from complete block to no block.

    “The second approach utilizes mutations in the CTD of GluN2B that cannot bind CaMKII as replacement for the wt (CaMKII L1298A/R1300Q) (120, 121, 230) or either competing with overexpressed full-length constructs (GluN2B R1300S/Q1303D) (231) or competing by expressing just the wt GluN2B CTD (839–1482) (232). The results are highly variable as reviewed in Ref. 233, ranging from complete block of LTP”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [121]

    In Results (‘The synaptic actions of CaMKII require binding to NMDARs’; page unavailable), the paper describes replacing GluN2B with a mutant that cannot bind CaMKII. It measures basal synaptic transmission in that replacement experiment, not LTP. The Discussion reports that earlier GluN2B-binding mutations impaired LTP, but does not establish the claimed range from complete block to no block. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Expressing constitutively active CaMKII on the background of GluN2B(L1298A-R1300Q) fails to enhance synaptic transmission.

    “Furthermore, expressing a constitutively active CaMKII on the background of GluN2B(L1298A-R1300Q) failed to enhance synaptic transmission (121).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [121]

    In Results (‘The synaptic actions of CaMKII require binding to NMDARs’; Fig. 9), a CaMKII-binding-deficient GluN2B mutant prevented the synaptic enhancement produced by CaMKIIα T305A/T306A. But the paper identifies the constitutively active construct as T286D-T305A/T306A and reports its failed enhancement with a CaMKIIα I205K mutation instead (Results, ‘CaMKII constitutive activity and the maintenance of LTP’; Fig. 10). Our copy therefore does not establish the claimed combination of constitutively active CaMKII and GluN2B(L1298A-R1300Q). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Expressing CA CaMKII fails to enhance AMPAR responses in cells with GluN2B(L1298A-R1300Q).

    “expressing CA CaMKII failed to enhance AMPAR responses.”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [121]

    In Results (‘The synaptic actions of CaMKII require binding to NMDARs’; page unavailable), a GluN2B mutant prevented enhancement by CaMKIIα T305A/T306A, but the paper does not identify that construct as constitutively active CaMKII. Results (‘CaMKII constitutive activity and the maintenance of LTP’) and the Discussion report that constitutively active CaMKII failed to enhance responses when CaMKII itself carried the I205K mutation. The claimed outcome is supported, but not for the stated combination of constructs. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 81 · Cited by 171

Authors
Incontro, S., Díaz-Alonso, J., Iafrati, J., Vieira, M., Asensio, C. S., Sohal, V. S., Roche, K. W., Bender, K. J., & Nicoll, R. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Incontro, Salvatore
  • Nicoll, Roger A.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2018-05-25
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
2069-2069
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2804368056
Cited by
171
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6
FWCI
7.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH070957, R01MH100292, R01MH117139)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA035913)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R15GM116096, R01GM124035)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
CaMKII, NMDA receptor, AMPA receptors, hippocampal synaptic transmission, CaMKIIα, CaMKIIβ, long-term potentiation, autophosphorylation
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Membrane, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Synaptic Transmission, Neurons, Phosphorylation, Synapses, Signal Transduction, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Receptors, Glutamate, Long-Term Potentiation, Mice, Knockout, Mice, Rats, Calcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2, HEK293 Cells, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review