Cited by 57Ubiquitin and proteasome pathwaysGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Atypical plant homeodomain of UBR7 functions as an H2BK120Ub ligase and breast tumor suppressor

Open access
Adhikary, Santanu, Chakravarti, Deepavali, Terranova, Christopher, Sengupta, Isha, Maitituoheti, Mayinuer, Dasgupta, Anirban, Srivastava, Dushyant Kumar, Ma, Junsheng +9 more·2019·Nature Communications

Abstract

The roles of Plant Homeodomain (PHD) fingers in catalysis of histone modifications are unknown. We demonstrated that the PHD finger of Ubiquitin Protein Ligase E3 Component N-Recognin7 (UBR7) harbors E3 ubiquitin ligase activity toward monoubiquitination of histone H2B at lysine120 (H2BK120Ub). Purified PHD finger or full-length UBR7 monoubiquitinated H2BK120 in vitro, and loss of UBR7 drastically reduced H2BK120Ub genome-wide binding sites in MCF10A cells. Low UBR7 expression was correlated with occurrence of triple-negative breast cancer and metastatic tumors. Consistently, UBR7 knockdown enhanced the invasiveness, induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and promoted metastasis. Conversely, ectopic expression of UBR7 restored these cellular phenotypes and reduced tumor growth. Mechanistically, UBR7 loss reduced H2BK120Ub levels on cell adhesion genes, including CDH4, and upregulated the Wnt/β-Catenin signaling pathway. CDH4 overexpression could partially revert UBR7-dependent cellular phenotypes. Collectively, our results established UBR7 as a histone H2B monoubiquitin ligase that suppresses tumorigenesis and metastasis of triple-negative breast cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-019-08986-5

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • IsoTOP-ABPP is a well-validated method for covalent ligand target identification.

    “prior to further processing using a well-validated method for covalent ligand target identification—isotopic tandem orthogonal proteolysis ABPP (isoTOP-ABPP) 2,17,26.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adhikary, S., Chakravarti, D., Terranova, C., Sengupta, I., Maitituoheti, M., Dasgupta, A., Srivastava, D. K., Ma, J., Raman, A. T., Tarco, E., Sahin, A. A., Bassett, R., Yang, F., Tapia, C., Roy, S., Rai, K., & Das, C.
Affiliations
  • Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics (IN)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Indian Institute of Chemical Biology (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Roy, Siddhartha
  • Rai, Kunal
  • Das, Chandrima
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2019-03-28
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
1398-1398
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2923057516
Cited by
57
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RP170067, CA160578)
  • University Grants Commission
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (RP170067, CA160578)
  • National Cancer Institute (R00CA160578, K99CA160578, CA160578, P30CA016672)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
plant homeodomain finger, E3 ubiquitin ligase, histone H2B, triple-negative breast cancer, tumor suppressor, metastasis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, CDH4, Wnt/β-catenin signaling, cell adhesion genes, MCF10A cells
MeSH terms
PHD Zinc Fingers, Animals, Cell Adhesion, Female, Histones, Humans, Mice, Nude, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasm Transplantation, Transplantation, Heterologous, Cadherins, Histone Code, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, Ubiquitination, Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition, Wnt Signaling Pathway, Carcinogenesis, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review