Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 518

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accurate detection of m6A RNA modifications in native RNA sequences

Open access
Liu, Huanle, Begik, Oguzhan, Lucas, Morghan C., Ramirez, Jose Miguel, Mason, Christopher E., Wiener, David, Schwartz, Schraga, Mattick, John S., Smith, Martin A., Novoa, Eva Maria·2019·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The epitranscriptomics field has undergone an enormous expansion in the last few years; however, a major limitation is the lack of generic methods to map RNA modifications transcriptome-wide. Here, we show that using direct RNA sequencing, N 6 -methyladenosine (m 6 A) RNA modifications can be detected with high accuracy, in the form of systematic errors and decreased base-calling qualities. Specifically, we find that our algorithm, trained with m 6 A-modified and unmodified synthetic sequences, can predict m 6 A RNA modifications with ~90% accuracy. We then extend our findings to yeast data sets, finding that our method can identify m 6 A RNA modifications in vivo with an accuracy of 87%. Moreover, we further validate our method by showing that these ‘errors’ are typically not observed in yeast ime4 -knockout strains, which lack m 6 A modifications. Our results open avenues to investigate the biological roles of RNA modifications in their native RNA context.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-019-11713-9

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Novoa, E. M., Mason, C. E. & Mattick, J. S. Charting the unknown epitranscriptome. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 339–340 (2017). · doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.49
  2. Garcia-Campos, M. A. et al. Deciphering the ‘m6A code’ via quantitative profiling of m6A at single-nucleotide resolution. Preprint at bioRxiv. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1101/571679. · doi:10.1101/571679

Cited by

See all 518

Metadata

Authors
Liu, H., Begik, O., Lucas, M. C., Ramirez, J. M., Mason, C. E., Wiener, D., Schwartz, S., Mattick, J. S., Smith, M. A., & Novoa, E. M.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2019-09-09
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
4079-4079
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2971454256
Cited by
518
References
47
FWCI
17.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Licence
Funders
Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (DP180103571, DE170100506)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accurate detection of m6A RNA modifications in native RNA sequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41467-019-11713-9
The paper
Liu, H., Begik, O., Lucas, M. C., Ramirez, J. M., Mason, C. E., Wiener, D., Schwartz, S., Mattick, J. S., Smith, M. A., & Novoa, E. M. (2019). Accurate detection of m6A RNA modifications in native RNA sequences. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11713-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.