Cited by 197Species Distribution and Climate ChangeWildlife Ecology and ConservationEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

Global correlates of range contractions and expansions in terrestrial mammals

Open access
Pacifici, Michela, Rondinini, Carlo, Rhodes, Jonathan R., Burbidge, Andrew A., Cristiano, Andrea, Watson, James E. M., Woinarski, John C. Z., Di Marco, Moreno·2020·Nature Communications

Abstract

Understanding changes in species distributions is essential to disentangle the mechanisms that drive their responses to anthropogenic habitat modification. Here we analyse the past (1970s) and current (2017) distribution of 204 species of terrestrial non-volant mammals to identify drivers of recent contraction and expansion in their range. We find 106 species lost part of their past range, and 40 of them declined by >50%. The key correlates of this contraction are large body mass, increase in air temperature, loss of natural land, and high human population density. At the same time, 44 species have some expansion in their range, which correlates with small body size, generalist diet, and high reproductive rates. Our findings clearly show that human activity and life history interact to influence range changes in mammals. While the former plays a major role in determining contraction in species’ distribution, the latter is important for both contraction and expansion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-020-16684-w

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Comparison among these datasets documents how the geographic concepts of species-rank mammal taxa have changed over relatively short time periods, mostly from taxonomic changes, in contrast to actual range shifts over longer periods.

    “Comparison among these datasets documents how the geographic concepts of species-rank mammal taxa have changed over relatively short time periods, mostly from taxonomic changes, in contrast to actual range shifts over longer periods (but see Pacifici et al. 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. [1]McGill BJ Dornelas M Gotelli NJ Magurran AE Fifteen forms of biodiversity trend in the Anthropocene Trends Ecol. Evol. 2015 30 104 113 25542312
  2. [4]Venter O Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation Nat. Commun. 2016 7 12558 27552116 PMC4996975
  3. [5]Loh J The Living Planet Index: using species population time series to track trends in biodiversity Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2005 360 289 295 PMC1569448 15814346
  4. [7]Di Marco M A retrospective evaluation of the global decline of carnivores and ungulates Conserv. Biol. 2014 28 1109 1118 25187922
  5. [11]Moritz C Impact of a century of climate change on small-mammal communities in Yosemite National Park, USA Science 2008 322 261 264 18845755
  6. [13]Luskin MS Cross-boundary subsidy cascades from oil palm degrade distant tropical forests Nat. Commun. 2017 8 2231 29263381 PMC5738359
  7. [15]Angert AL Do species’ traits predict recent shifts at expanding range edges? Ecol. Lett. 2011 14 677 689 21535340
  8. [16]Di Marco M Santini L Human pressures predict species’ geographic range size better than biological traits Glob. Chang. Biol. 2015 21 2169 2178 25504910
  9. [18]Pacifici M Visconti P Rondinini C A framework for the identification of hotspots of climate change risk for mammals Glob. Chang. Biol. 2018 24 1626 1636 29031011
  10. [19]Davidson AM Jennions M Nicotra AB Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species and, if so, is it adaptive? A meta-analysis Ecol. Lett. 2011 14 419 431 21314880
  11. [24]Pacifici M Geographic distribution ranges of terrestrial mammal species in the 1970s Ecology 2019 100 e02747 31116881
  12. [25]Chen I-C Hill JK Ohlemüller R Roy DB Thomas CD Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming Science 2011 333 1024 1026 21852500
  13. [28]Channell R Lomollno MV Dynamic biogeography and conservation of endangered species Nature 2000 403 84 86 10638757
  14. [31]Woodroffe R Ginsberg JR Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas Science 1998 280 2126 2128 9641920
  15. [32]Schloss CA Nuñez TA Lawler JJ Dispersal will limit ability of mammals to track climate change in the Western Hemisphere Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2012 109 8606 8611 22586104 PMC3365214
  16. [33]Tucker MA Moving in the Anthropocene: global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements Science 2018 359 466 469 29371471
  17. [36]Fisher DO Blomberg SP Owens IPF Extrinsic versus intrinsic factors in the decline and extinction of Australian marsupials Proc. R. Soc. B 2003 270 1801 1808 12964982 PMC1691447
  18. [37]Woinarski JCZ Burbidge AA Harrison PL Ongoing unraveling of a continental fauna: decline and extinction of Australian mammals since European settlement Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2015 112 4531 4540 25675493 PMC4403217
  19. [41]Villaseñor NR Driscoll DA Escobar MAH Gibbons P Lindenmayer DB Urbanization Impacts on mammals across urban-forest edges and a predictive model of edge effects PLoS ONE 2014 9 e97036 24810286 PMC4014578
  20. [42]Crooks KR Quantification of habitat fragmentation reveals extinction risk in terrestrial mammals Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2017 114 7635 7640 28673992 PMC5530695
  21. [43]Talukdar, B. K. et al. Rhinoceros unicornis. In 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/19496 (2008). Available at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=it&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Rhinoceros+unicornis.+In+2008+IUCN+Red+List+of+Threatened+Species&btnG=.
  22. [44]Bielby J The fast-slow continuum in mammalian life history: an empirical reevaluation Am. Nat. 2007 169 748 757 17479461
  23. [45]Santini L A trait-based approach for predicting species responses to environmental change from sparse data: how well might terrestrial mammals track climate change? Glob. Chang. Biol. 2016 22 2415 2424 27073017
  24. [46]Loughry, J., McDonough, C. & Abba, A. Dasypus novemcinctus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2014: e.T6290A47440785. 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2014-1.RLTS.T6290A47440785.en (2014). · DOI
  25. [48]Ceballos G Ehrlich PR Global mammal distributions, biodiversity hotspots, and conservation Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2006 103 19374 19379 17164331 PMC1698439
  26. [49]Scheffers BR The broad footprint of climate change from genes to biomes to people Science 2016 354 aaf7671 27846577
  27. [50]Do Linh San, E. & Maddock, A. H. Herpestes sanguineus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T41606A45206143.en (2016). · DOI
  28. [51]Meijaard, E., Oliver, W. R. T. & Leus, K. Sus cebifrons. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-3.RLTS.T21175A44139575.en (2017). · DOI
  29. [53]Tacutu R Human Ageing Genomic Resources: integrated databases and tools for the biology and genetics of ageing Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 41 D1027 D1033 23193293 PMC3531213
  30. [57]Pesaresi, M., Syrris, V. & Julea, A. Analyzing big remote sensing data via symbolic machine learning. Big Data Anal.10.2788/854791 (2016). · DOI
  31. [58]Pagad S Genovesi P Carnevali L Schigel D McGeoch MA Introducing the Global Register of Introduced and Invasive Species Sci. Data 2018 5 170202 29360103 PMC5779068
  32. [60]Diniz‐Filho JAF de Sant’Ana CER Bini LM An eigenvector method for estimating phylogenetic inertia Evolution 1998 52 1247 1262 28565378
  33. [61]Faurby S PHYLACINE 1.2: the phylogenetic atlas of mammal macroecology Ecology 2018 99 2626 2626 29989146
  34. [63]Pearson RG Life history and spatial traits predict extinction risk due to climate change Nat. Clim. Chang. 2014 4 217 221
  35. [66]Di Marco M Venter O Possingham H Watson J Changes in human footprint drive changes in species extinction risk Nat. Commun 2018 9 1 9 30397204 PMC6218474
  36. [69]Murphy MA Evans JS Storfer A Quantifying Bufo boreas connectivity in Yellowstone National Park with landscape genetics Ecology 2010 91 252 261 20380214

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pacifici, M., Rondinini, C., Rhodes, J. R., Burbidge, A. A., Cristiano, A., Watson, J. E. M., Woinarski, J. C. Z., & Di Marco, M.
Affiliations
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Wildlife Conservation Society (US)
  • Charles Darwin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Pacifici, Michela
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2020-06-05
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
2840-2840
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3033166656
Cited by
197
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 8
FWCI
42.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Australian Research Council
  • University of Queensland
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (H2020-MSCA, H2020-MSCA-IF-2017, MSCA-IF-2017)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
range contraction, range expansion, terrestrial mammals, range shifts, anthropogenic habitat modification, body mass, air temperature, land loss, human population density, life-history traits, diet generalism, reproductive rate, range loss
MeSH terms
Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Humans, Mammals, Models, Biological, Population Density, Population Dynamics, Temperature, Body Size, Climate Change, Animal Distribution, Ecological Parameter Monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review