CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 179Solar Radiation and PhotovoltaicsPhotovoltaic Systems and SustainabilitySolar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impacts of solar intermittency on future photovoltaic reliability.

Open access
Yin, Jun, Molini, Annalisa, Porporato, Amilcare·2020·Nature Communications
DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-18602-6PMC PMC7508863
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

As photovoltaic power is expanding rapidly worldwide, it is imperative to assess its promise under future climate scenarios. While a great deal of research has been devoted to trends in mean solar radiation, less attention has been paid to its intermittent character, a key challenge when compounded with uncertainties related to climate variability. Using both satellite data and climate model outputs, we characterize solar radiation intermittency to assess future photovoltaic reliability. We find that the relation between the future power supply and long-term mean solar radiation trends is spatially heterogeneous, showing power reliability is more sensitive to the fluctuations of mean solar radiation in hot arid regions. Our results highlight how reliability analysis must account simultaneously for the mean and intermittency of solar inputs when assessing the impacts of climate change on photovoltaics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-020-18602-6

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Examples of climate impacts on solar radiation and photovoltaic power reliability. The distribution of clearness index (K) derived from the CERES data in (a, c) January and (b, d) July during 2001–2009 (blue lines) and during 2010–2018 (red lines) in (a, b) Southern Romania and (c, d) Dubai. The hatched areas indicate the probability when power generation does not meet the demand, the loss-of-load probability (LOLP). The averages of clearness index are marked by the vertical dash lines and the values are reported in Supplementary Table 1. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 1 Examples of climate impacts on solar radiation and photovoltaic power reliability. The distribution of clearness index (K) derived from the CERES data in (a, c) January and (b, d) July during 2001–2009 (blue lines) and during 2010–2018 (red lines) in (a, b) Southern Romania and (c, d) Dubai. The hatched areas indicate the probability when power generation does not meet the demand, the loss-of-load probability (LOLP). The averages of clearness index are marked by the vertical dash lines and the values are reported in Supplementary Table 1. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Variations of solar radiation and solar power reliability predicted from climate models. The color at each grid point represents the ensemble means of (a, b) the relative change of mean clearness index (Δμ/μ) and (c, d) the change of loss-of-load probability (ΔLOLP) between 2006–2015 and 2041–2050 in the month of (a, c) January and (b, d) July from 11 climate model outputs. The LOLP during 2006–2015 (i.e., design LOLP) is set as 0.3; maps with other design LOLP show similar patterns (see Supplementary Figs. 2 and 3). The dots show the ensemble mean of the corresponding variables are statistically different than zero, suggesting consistent variations of solar radiation or reliability from most climate models (t-test, 5% significance level; statistics of the sign of the changes are given in Supplementary Figs. 4–6). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 2 Variations of solar radiation and solar power reliability predicted from climate models. The color at each grid point represents the ensemble means of (a, b) the relative change of mean clearness index (Δμ/μ) and (c, d) the change of loss-of-load probability (ΔLOLP) between 2006–2015 and 2041–2050 in the month of (a, c) January and (b, d) July from 11 climate model outputs. The LOLP during 2006–2015 (i.e., design LOLP) is set as 0.3; maps with other design LOLP show similar patterns (see Supplementary Figs. 2 and 3). The dots show the ensemble mean of the corresponding variables are statistically different than zero, suggesting consistent variations of solar radiation or reliability from most climate models (t-test, 5% significance level; statistics of the sign of the changes are given in Supplementary Figs. 4–6). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Statistics of the clearness index. a Probability density functions (pdf) of daily clearness index (K) in different regions over the world (binning width of 0.05) from the satellite data in January during 2001–2009 (dark color) and during 2010–2018 (light color). b Relationship between mean (μ) and standard deviation (σ) of daily K. The black/blue/red dots correspond to the lines in the a; the grey dots are from 11 climate model outputs during 2006–2015; the dash green curve shows the best quadratic fit. c dσ/dμ calculated as the derivative of the corresponding σ ~ μ relationship in (b). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 3 Statistics of the clearness index. a Probability density functions (pdf) of daily clearness index (K) in different regions over the world (binning width of 0.05) from the satellite data in January during 2001–2009 (dark color) and during 2010–2018 (light color). b Relationship between mean (μ) and standard deviation (σ) of daily K. The black/blue/red dots correspond to the lines in the a; the grey dots are from 11 climate model outputs during 2006–2015; the dash green curve shows the best quadratic fit. c dσ/dμ calculated as the derivative of the corresponding σ ~ μ relationship in (b). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Sensitivity of loss-of-load probability (Ls). Contour plots of Ls is calculated (a) analytically from Eq. (2) and (b) numerically from climate model outputs. The red and blue dots in (b) are corresponding to the examples in (d), which compares the change of loss-of-load probability (LOLP) and the change of mean clearness index (μ) from 2006–2015 to 2041–2050 in January with design LOLP of 0.3 in regions where 0.3 < μ < 0.35 (red dots) and 0.65 < μ < 0.7 (blue dots) as projected by climate models. The red and blue lines are the corresponding best fit lines and their slopes (i.e., ΔLOLP / (Δμ/μ)) numerically represent Ls. (c) As in (d) but only for Bulgaria, Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, and Romania (i.e., region 7 defined in ref. 18) in January (red dots) and July (blue dots). The red and blue circles correspond to the example of Southern Romania in Fig. 1. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 4 Sensitivity of loss-of-load probability (Ls). Contour plots of Ls is calculated (a) analytically from Eq. (2) and (b) numerically from climate model outputs. The red and blue dots in (b) are corresponding to the examples in (d), which compares the change of loss-of-load probability (LOLP) and the change of mean clearness index (μ) from 2006–2015 to 2041–2050 in January with design LOLP of 0.3 in regions where 0.3 < μ < 0.35 (red dots) and 0.65 < μ < 0.7 (blue dots) as projected by climate models. The red and blue lines are the corresponding best fit lines and their slopes (i.e., ΔLOLP / (Δμ/μ)) numerically represent Ls. (c) As in (d) but only for Bulgaria, Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, and Romania (i.e., region 7 defined in ref. 18) in January (red dots) and July (blue dots). The red and blue circles correspond to the example of Southern Romania in Fig. 1. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 Global maps of LOLP sensitivity (Ls). This sensitivity in (a) January and (b) July is obtained from analytical solutions with design LOLP of 0.3 and solar radiation climatology from CERES. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 5 Global maps of LOLP sensitivity (Ls). This sensitivity in (a) January and (b) July is obtained from analytical solutions with design LOLP of 0.3 and solar radiation climatology from CERES. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 179

Related

Metadata

Authors
Yin, J., Molini, A., & Porporato, A.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN)
  • Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE)
  • Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Porporato, Amilcare
ORCID
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-09-22
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
4781-4781
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/s41467-020-18602-6
PMC
PMC7508863
OpenAlex
W3003290234
Cited by
179
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2
FWCI
5.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (41877158, 51739009)
  • National Science Foundation (EAR-1316258, FESD EAR-1338694)
  • United States Department of Agriculture | Agricultural Research Service (58-6408-3-027)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
Keywords
solar intermittency, photovoltaic module reliability, solar radiation variability, climate change impacts, solar power supply, climate model projections, arid regions, spatial heterogeneity, renewable energy reliability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review