Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 572

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A pyridinic Fe-N4 macrocycle models the active sites in Fe/N-doped carbon electrocatalysts

Open access
Marshall-Roth, Travis, Libretto, Nicole J., Wrobel, Alexandra T., Anderton, Kevin J., Pegis, Michael L., Ricke, Nathan D., Voorhis, Troy Van, Miller, Jeffrey T., Surendranath, Yogesh·2020·Nature Communications

Abstract

Iron- and nitrogen-doped carbon (Fe-N-C) materials are leading candidates to replace platinum catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in fuel cells; however, their active site structures remain poorly understood. A leading postulate is that the iron-containing active sites exist primarily in a pyridinic Fe-N 4 ligation environment, yet, molecular model catalysts generally feature pyrrolic coordination. Herein, we report a molecular pyridinic hexaazacyclophane macrocycle, (phen 2 N 2 )Fe, and compare its spectroscopic, electrochemical, and catalytic properties for ORR to a typical Fe-N-C material and prototypical pyrrolic iron macrocycles. N 1s XPS and XAS signatures for (phen 2 N 2 )Fe are remarkably similar to those of Fe-N-C. Electrochemical studies reveal that (phen 2 N 2 )Fe has a relatively high Fe(III/II) potential with a correlated ORR onset potential within 150 mV of Fe-N-C. Unlike the pyrrolic macrocycles, (phen 2 N 2 )Fe displays excellent selectivity for four-electron ORR, comparable to Fe-N-C materials. The aggregate spectroscopic and electrochemical data demonstrate that (phen 2 N 2 )Fe is a more effective model of Fe-N-C active sites relative to the pyrrolic iron macrocycles, thereby establishing a new molecular platform that can aid understanding of this important class of catalytic materials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-020-18969-6

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 83 references

Cited by

See all 572

Metadata

Authors
Marshall-Roth, T., Libretto, N. J., Wrobel, A. T., Anderton, K. J., Pegis, M. L., Ricke, N. D., Voorhis, T. V., Miller, J. T., & Surendranath, Y.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2020-10-19
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
5283-5283
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3092926896
Cited by
572
References
83
FWCI
12.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A pyridinic Fe-N4 macrocycle models the active sites in Fe/N-doped carbon electrocatalysts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41467-020-18969-6
The paper
Marshall-Roth, T., Libretto, N. J., Wrobel, A. T., Anderton, K. J., Pegis, M. L., Ricke, N. D., Voorhis, T. V., Miller, J. T., & Surendranath, Y. (2020). A pyridinic Fe-N4 macrocycle models the active sites in Fe/N-doped carbon electrocatalysts. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18969-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.