Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 503

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inverse ZrO2/Cu as a highly efficient methanol synthesis catalyst from CO2 hydrogenation

Open access
Wu, Congyi, Lin, Lili, Liu, Jinjia, Zhang, Jingpeng, Zhang, Feng, Zhou, Tong, Rui, Ning, Yao, Siyu, Deng, Yuchen, Yang, Feng, Xu, Wenqian, Luo, Jun, Zhao, Yue, Yan, Binhang, Wen, Xiao-Dong, Rodriguez, José A., Ma, Ding·2020·Nature Communications

Abstract

Enhancing the intrinsic activity and space time yield of Cu based heterogeneous methanol synthesis catalysts through CO 2 hydrogenation is one of the major topics in CO 2 conversion into value-added liquid fuels and chemicals. Here we report inverse ZrO 2/Cu catalysts with a tunable Zr/Cu ratio have been prepared via an oxalate co-precipitation method, showing excellent performance for CO 2 hydrogenation to methanol. Under optimal condition, the catalyst composed by 10% of ZrO 2 supported over 90% of Cu exhibits the highest mass-specific methanol formation rate of 524 g MeOH kg cat−1 h−1 at 220 °C, 3.3 times higher than the activity of traditional Cu/ZrO 2 catalysts (159 g MeOH kg cat−1 h−1). In situ XRD-PDF, XAFS and AP-XPS structural studies reveal that the inverse ZrO 2/Cu catalysts are composed of islands of partially reduced 1–2 nm amorphous ZrO 2 supported over metallic Cu particles. The ZrO 2 islands are highly active for the CO 2 activation. Meanwhile, an intermediate of formate adsorbed on the Cu at 1350 cm−1 is discovered by the in situ DRIFTS. This formate intermediate exhibits fast hydrogenation conversion to methoxy. The activation of CO 2 and hydrogenation of all the surface oxygenate intermediates are significantly accelerated over the inverse ZrO 2/Cu configuration, accounting for the excellent methanol formation activity observed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-020-19634-8

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Metadata

Authors
Wu, C., Lin, L., Liu, J., Zhang, J., Zhang, F., Zhou, T., Rui, N., Yao, S., Deng, Y., Yang, F., Xu, W., Luo, J., Zhao, Y., Yan, B., Wen, X.-D., Rodriguez, J. A., & Ma, D.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2020-11-13
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
5767-5767
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3100529310
Cited by
503
References
44
FWCI
9.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inverse ZrO2/Cu as a highly efficient methanol synthesis catalyst from CO2 hydrogenation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41467-020-19634-8
The paper
Wu, C., Lin, L., Liu, J., Zhang, J., Zhang, F., Zhou, T., Rui, N., Yao, S., Deng, Y., Yang, F., Xu, W., Luo, J., Zhao, Y., Yan, B., Wen, X.-D., Rodriguez, J. A., & Ma, D. (2020). Inverse ZrO2/Cu as a highly efficient methanol synthesis catalyst from CO2 hydrogenation. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19634-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.