Measuring expression heterogeneity of single-cell cytoskeletal protein complexes
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Multimeric cytoskeletal protein complexes orchestrate normal cellular function. However, protein-complex distributions in stressed, heterogeneous cell populations remain unknown. Cell staining and proximity-based methods have limited selectivity and/or sensitivity for endogenous multimeric protein-complex quantification from single cells. We introduce micro-arrayed, differential detergent fractionation to simultaneously detect protein complexes in hundreds of individual cells. Fractionation occurs by 60 s size-exclusion electrophoresis with protein complex-stabilizing buffer that minimizes depolymerization. Proteins are measured with a ~5-hour immunoassay. Co-detection of cytoskeletal protein complexes in U2OS cells treated with filamentous actin (F-actin) destabilizing Latrunculin A detects a unique subpopulation (~2%) exhibiting downregulated F-actin, but upregulated microtubules. Thus, some cells may upregulate other cytoskeletal complexes to counteract the stress of Latrunculin A treatment. We also sought to understand the effect of non-chemical stress on cellular heterogeneity of F-actin. We find heat shock may dysregulate filamentous and globular actin correlation. In this work, our assay overcomes selectivity limitations to biochemically quantify single-cell protein complexes perturbed with diverse stimuli.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Taniguchi, Y., Choi, P. J., Li, G.-W., Chen, H., Babu, M., Hearn, J., Emili, A., & Xie, X. S. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1188308 · Cited by 1,982 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The CQV is a metric of variance accounting for skewed distributions 63 , such as gamma-distributed protein expression 64 : F-actin level.”
BackgroundStochastic protein expression in individual cells at the single molecule level
Cai, L., Friedman, N., & Xie, X. S. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04599 · Cited by 1,145 · see citing works
Bubb, M. R., Senderowicz, A. M., Sausville, E. A., Duncan, K. L., & Korn, E. D. (1994) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(17)36545-6 · Cited by 811 · see citing works
Zhu, Y., Piehowski, P. D., Zhao, R., Chen, J., Shen, Y., Moore, R. J., Shukla, A. K., Petyuk, V. A., Campbell-Thompson, M., Mathews, C. E., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03367-w · Cited by 587 · see citing works
Li, J. J., Bickel, P. J., & Biggin, M. D. (2014) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.270 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Zhou, M., Uwugiaren, N., Williams, S. M., Moore, R. J., Zhao, R., Goodlett, D., Dapic, I., Paša-Tolić, L., & Zhu, Y. (2020) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00467 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Measuring expression heterogeneity of single-cell cytoskeletal protein complexes
Vlassakis, J., Hansen, L. L., Higuchi-Sanabria, R., Zhou, Y., Tsui, C. K., Dillin, A., Huang, H., & Herr, A. E. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.09.12.294801 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Vlassakis, J., Hansen, L. L., Higuchi-Sanabria, R., Zhou, Y., Tsui, C. K., Dillin, A., Huang, H., & Herr, A. E.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Herr, Amy E.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2021-08-17
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4969-4969
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8371148
- OpenAlex
- W3194320991
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (DGE1106400, CBET1056035)
- Society for Lab Automation and Screening
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (1K99AG065200-01A1, R01AG055891-01, R01CA203018)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-16-1-0002)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
- Keywords
- single-cell heterogeneity, F-actin, microtubules, latrunculin A, heat shock, U2OS cells
- MeSH terms
- Actins, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cell Line, Cytoskeletal Proteins, Cytoskeleton, Humans, Microtubules, Models, Biological, Genetic Heterogeneity, Heat-Shock Response, Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic, Thiazolidines, Single-Cell Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review