CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 177Ocular Oncology and TreatmentsOcular Diseases and Behçet’s SyndromeCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The PEMDAC phase 2 study of pembrolizumab and entinostat in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma

Open access
Ny, Lars, Jespersen, Henrik, Karlsson, Joakim, Alsén, Samuel, Filges, Stefan, All-Eriksson, Charlotta, Andersson, Bengt, Carneiro, Ana, Helgadottir, Hildur, Levin, Max, Ljuslinder, Ingrid, Olofsson Bagge, Roger, Sah, Vasu R., Stierner, Ulrika, Ståhlberg, Anders, Ullenhag, Gustav, Nilsson, Lisa M., Nilsson, Jonas A.·2021·Nature Communications
DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-25332-wPMC PMC8397717
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Preclinical studies have suggested that epigenetic therapy could enhance immunogenicity of cancer cells. We report the results of the PEMDAC phase 2 clinical trial ( n = 29; NCT02697630) where the HDAC inhibitor entinostat was combined with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (UM). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), and was met with an ORR of 14%. The clinical benefit rate at 18 weeks was 28%, median progression free survival was 2.1 months and the median overall survival was 13.4 months. Toxicities were manageable, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Objective responses and/or prolonged survival were seen in patients with BAP1 wildtype tumors, and in one patient with an iris melanoma that exhibited a UV signature. Longer survival also correlated with low baseline ctDNA levels or LDH. In conclusion, HDAC inhibition and anti-PD1 immunotherapy results in durable responses in a subset of patients with metastatic UM. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT02697630 (registered 3 March 2016). EudraCT registration number: 2016–002114-50.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-021-25332-w

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Clinical outcome data from the PEMDAC trial at data cutoff in December 2019. a Waterfall plot showing maximum change in sum of target lesion diameter from baseline to data cutoff. One patient did not have a response assessment after baseline and is not included in the figure. Dotted lines represent thresholds for progressive disease (+20%) and partial response (−30%), respectively, according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. b Spider plot showing change in the sum of target lesion diameter over time for all patients with at least one follow-up scan. c Swimmer’s plot showing time on treatment, time to best response, and duration of response in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. In panels (a,b), n = 28 and in (c) n = 29 patients are shown, respectively. d Kaplan–Meier analysis showing overall survival (OS) of all patients. e Kaplan–Meier analysis showing progression-free survival (PFS) of all patients except one. f Circulating tumor DNA levels in patients with UM. Plasma from twenty-five patients was analyzed for the presence of mutated reads in either GNA11 (Q209L) or GNAQ (Q209L/P). Variant allele frequencies (VAF) in percent compared with reads with wildtype alleles are plotted. g Kaplan–Meier analysis comparing OS between patients with high or low (relative to median) levels of total detected ctDNA copies, n = 14 and n = 15 patients, respectively. h Kaplan–Meier analysis comparing OS between patients with lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) baseline greater or lower than the upper limit of normal (ULN), n = 17 and n = 12 patients, respectively. In (g, h), p-values for survival associations were calculated using log-rank tests. No adjustments for multiple comparisons were made. All statistical tests were two-sided. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 1 Clinical outcome data from the PEMDAC trial at data cutoff in December 2019. a Waterfall plot showing maximum change in sum of target lesion diameter from baseline to data cutoff. One patient did not have a response assessment after baseline and is not included in the figure. Dotted lines represent thresholds for progressive disease (+20%) and partial response (−30%), respectively, according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. b Spider plot showing change in the sum of target lesion diameter over time for all patients with at least one follow-up scan. c Swimmer’s plot showing time on treatment, time to best response, and duration of response in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. In panels (a,b), n = 28 and in (c) n = 29 patients are shown, respectively. d Kaplan–Meier analysis showing overall survival (OS) of all patients. e Kaplan–Meier analysis showing progression-free survival (PFS) of all patients except one. f Circulating tumor DNA levels in patients with UM. Plasma from twenty-five patients was analyzed for the presence of mutated reads in either GNA11 (Q209L) or GNAQ (Q209L/P). Variant allele frequencies (VAF) in percent compared with reads with wildtype alleles are plotted. g Kaplan–Meier analysis comparing OS between patients with high or low (relative to median) levels of total detected ctDNA copies, n = 14 and n = 15 patients, respectively. h Kaplan–Meier analysis comparing OS between patients with lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) baseline greater or lower than the upper limit of normal (ULN), n = 17 and n = 12 patients, respectively. In (g, h), p-values for survival associations were calculated using log-rank tests. No adjustments for multiple comparisons were made. All statistical tests were two-sided. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Genetic analyses of pretreatment biopsies from patients recruited to the PEMDAC trial. a Mutations in genes that are either recurrently altered in UM or listed among COSMIC Cancer Gene Census driver genes. Responses in the trial are indicated. b Copy number profiles of each tumor inferred from exome sequencing data of tumors and matched normal tissue. Differences in color intensity depend on copy number amplitude and tumor purity. c, d OS and PFS analyses comparing patients with GNAQ- or GNA11-mutated UM (n = 21). e Fisher’s exact test of BAP1 mutational status versus responses in the PEMDAC trial. PD: progressive disease; SD: stable disease; PR: partial response. f Number of detected mutations from exome-sequencing data. g CT scans of patient 4–022 at baseline and at best response (22 months post therapy). Arrows show PET-positive lesions that disappeared from the dorsal neck region and left gluteus. h, i Comparison of OS and PFS to assess if UM patients with a wild-type BAP1 status or a UV-damaged genome survive longer than the other patients (n = 24). In (c, d) and (h, i), p-values for survival associations were calculated using log-rank tests. No adjustments for multiple comparisons were made. All statistical tests were two-sided. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 2 Genetic analyses of pretreatment biopsies from patients recruited to the PEMDAC trial. a Mutations in genes that are either recurrently altered in UM or listed among COSMIC Cancer Gene Census driver genes. Responses in the trial are indicated. b Copy number profiles of each tumor inferred from exome sequencing data of tumors and matched normal tissue. Differences in color intensity depend on copy number amplitude and tumor purity. c, d OS and PFS analyses comparing patients with GNAQ- or GNA11-mutated UM (n = 21). e Fisher’s exact test of BAP1 mutational status versus responses in the PEMDAC trial. PD: progressive disease; SD: stable disease; PR: partial response. f Number of detected mutations from exome-sequencing data. g CT scans of patient 4–022 at baseline and at best response (22 months post therapy). Arrows show PET-positive lesions that disappeared from the dorsal neck region and left gluteus. h, i Comparison of OS and PFS to assess if UM patients with a wild-type BAP1 status or a UV-damaged genome survive longer than the other patients (n = 24). In (c, d) and (h, i), p-values for survival associations were calculated using log-rank tests. No adjustments for multiple comparisons were made. All statistical tests were two-sided. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Immune profiles of pre- and post-treatment (one cycle) blood samples. a–c Flow cytometry analyses of changes in circulating cell populations in shorter and longer survivors following treatment with entinostat and pembrolizumab. Gating strategies can be found in Supplementary Fig. 5. (a) Graphs showing the frequency of CD3 + lymphocytes (left), CD14 + monocytes (middle), and CD33 + neutrophils (right) among patients with shorter (n = 12) and (b) longer (n = 12) survival prior to (circles) or after (squares) one cycle of treatment. (c) Analysis of CD8 + cytotoxic T cells in patients with shorter and longer survival. Statistical analysis was performed using multiple paired t-tests correct for multiple comparisons using a two-stage step-up (Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli) with test between all groups in (a–b), where * indicates adjusted p-values < 0.05. d White blood cells from three patients were analyzed by 10x Genomics TCR and gene expression analysis. Statistically altered genes in different cell types after treatment in the categories antigen presentation, immune-checkpoint receptors, and transcriptional regulation. n = 3 patient samples were compared pre- and post treatment. Genes shown were significant at q < 0.05. p-values were calculated with Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and adjusted for multiple comparisons with the Benjamini–Hochberg method. All statistical tests were two-sided. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 3 Immune profiles of pre- and post-treatment (one cycle) blood samples. a–c Flow cytometry analyses of changes in circulating cell populations in shorter and longer survivors following treatment with entinostat and pembrolizumab. Gating strategies can be found in Supplementary Fig. 5. (a) Graphs showing the frequency of CD3 + lymphocytes (left), CD14 + monocytes (middle), and CD33 + neutrophils (right) among patients with shorter (n = 12) and (b) longer (n = 12) survival prior to (circles) or after (squares) one cycle of treatment. (c) Analysis of CD8 + cytotoxic T cells in patients with shorter and longer survival. Statistical analysis was performed using multiple paired t-tests correct for multiple comparisons using a two-stage step-up (Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli) with test between all groups in (a–b), where * indicates adjusted p-values < 0.05. d White blood cells from three patients were analyzed by 10x Genomics TCR and gene expression analysis. Statistically altered genes in different cell types after treatment in the categories antigen presentation, immune-checkpoint receptors, and transcriptional regulation. n = 3 patient samples were compared pre- and post treatment. Genes shown were significant at q < 0.05. p-values were calculated with Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and adjusted for multiple comparisons with the Benjamini–Hochberg method. All statistical tests were two-sided. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 177

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ny, L., Jespersen, H., Karlsson, J., Alsén, S., Filges, S., All-Eriksson, C., Andersson, B., Carneiro, A., Helgadottir, H., Levin, M., Ljuslinder, I., Olofsson Bagge, R., Sah, V. R., Stierner, U., Ståhlberg, A., Ullenhag, G., Nilsson, L. M., & Nilsson, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • Akershus University Hospital (NO)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • University Hospital of Umeå (SE)
  • Uppsala University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
  • Ny, Lars
  • Nilsson, Jonas A.
ORCID
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2021-08-27
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
5155-5155
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/s41467-021-25332-w
PMC
PMC8397717
OpenAlex
W3196177384
Cited by
177
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 9
FWCI
27.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Merck
  • Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
  • Cancerfonden
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Familjen Erling-Perssons Stiftelse
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Oncology and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Keywords
pembrolizumab, entinostat, metastatic uveal melanoma, histone deacetylase inhibitors, PD-1 inhibitors, epigenetic therapy, combination immunotherapy, objective response rate, circulating tumor DNA, lactate dehydrogenase, iris melanoma, progression-free survival, overall survival
MeSH terms
Progression-Free Survival, Uveal Melanoma, Benzamides, Humans, Melanoma, Pyridines, Uveal Neoplasms, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, Ubiquitin Thiolesterase, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review