Cited by 102CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseCAR-T cell therapy research

Predicting base editing outcomes with an attention-based deep learning algorithm trained on high-throughput target library screens

Open access
Marquart, Kim F., Allam, Ahmed, Janjuha, Sharan, Sintsova, Anna, Villiger, Lukas, Frey, Nina, Krauthammer, Michael, Schwank, Gerald·2021·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Base editors are chimeric ribonucleoprotein complexes consisting of a DNA-targeting CRISPR-Cas module and a single-stranded DNA deaminase. They enable transition of C•G into T•A base pairs and vice versa on genomic DNA. While base editors have great potential as genome editing tools for basic research and gene therapy, their application has been hampered by a broad variation in editing efficiencies on different genomic loci. Here we perform an extensive analysis of adenine- and cytosine base editors on a library of 28,294 lentivirally integrated genetic sequences and establish BE-DICT, an attention-based deep learning algorithm capable of predicting base editing outcomes with high accuracy. BE-DICT is a versatile tool that in principle can be trained on any novel base editor variant, facilitating the application of base editing for research and therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-021-25375-z

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Editing efficiency of both ABEs and CBEs relies on factors such as the editing position within the protospacer and the tri-nucleotide sequence around the editing site.

    “It has been previously shown that the editing efficiency of both ABEs and CBEs relies on factors such as the editing position within the protospacer and the tri-nucleotide sequence around the editing site49.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [1]Rees, H. A. & Liu, D. R. Base editing: precision chemistry on the genome and transcriptome of living cells. Nat. Rev. Genet.19, 770–788 (2018). PMC6535181 30323312
  2. [4]Anzalone, A. V., Koblan, L. W. & Liu, D. R. Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors. Nat Biotechnol38, 824–844 (2020). 32572269
  3. [5]Wang T Wei JJ Sabatini DM Lander ES Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system Science (80-.). 2014 343 80 84 10.1126/science.1246981 PMC3972032 24336569 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [9]Koblan LW Improving cytidine and adenine base editors by expression optimization and ancestral reconstruction Nat. Biotechnol. 2018 36 843 848 10.1038/nbt.4172 29813047 PMC6126947 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [10]Arbab, M. et al. Determinants of base editing outcomes from target library analysis and machine learning. Cell182, 463–480.e30 (2020). PMC7384975 32533916
  6. [11]Saraconi G Severi F Sala C Mattiuz G Conticello SG The RNA editing enzyme APOBEC1 induces somatic mutations and a compatible mutational signature is present in esophageal adenocarcinomas Genome Biol. 2014 15 417 10.1186/s13059-014-0417-z 25085003 PMC4144122 · DOI
  7. [12]Kang BC Precision genome engineering through adenine base editing in plants Nat. Plants 2018 4 427 431 10.1038/s41477-018-0178-x 29867128 · DOI
  8. [13]Song M Sequence-specific prediction of the efficiencies of adenine and cytosine base editors Nat. Biotechnol. 2020 38 1037 1043 10.1038/s41587-020-0573-5 32632303 · DOI
  9. [14]Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pp. 5998-6008 (2017).
  10. [15]Komor AC Improved base excision repair inhibition and bacteriophage Mu Gam protein yields C:G-to-T:A base editors with higher efficiency and product purity Sci. Adv. 2017 3 eaao4774 10.1126/sciadv.aao4774 28875174 PMC5576876 · DOI
  11. [18]Landrum MJ ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 42 980 985 10.1093/nar/gkt1113 PMC3965032 24234437 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [20]Stewart SA Lentivirus-delivered stable gene silencing by RNAi in primary cells RNA 2003 9 493 501 10.1261/rna.2192803 12649500 PMC1370415 · DOI
  13. [21]Grünewald J CRISPR DNA base editors with reduced RNA off-target and self-editing activities Nat. Biotechnol. 2019 37 1041 1048 10.1038/s41587-019-0236-6 31477922 PMC6730565 · DOI
  14. [22]Balciunas D Harnessing a high cargo-capacity transposon for genetic applications in vertebrates PLoS Genet. 2006 2 1715 1724 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020169 PMC1635535 17096595 · DOI
  15. [23]Sanjana, N. E., O. Shalem, O & Zhang, F. Improved vectors and genome-wide libraries for CRISPR screening. Nat. Methods11, 783–784 (2014). PMC4486245 25075903
  16. [24]Villiger L Treatment of a metabolic liver disease by in vivo genome base editing in adult mice Nat. Med. 2018 24 1519 1525 10.1038/s41591-018-0209-1 30297904 · DOI
  17. [25]Martin M Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads EMBnet. J. 2011 17 10 10.14806/ej.17.1.200 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [26]Langmead B Salzberg SL Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2 Nat. Methods 2012 9 357 359 10.1038/nmeth.1923 22388286 PMC3322381 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [27]Shen MW Predictable and precise template-free CRISPR editing of pathogenic variants Nature 2018 563 646 651 10.1038/s41586-018-0686-x 30405244 PMC6517069 · DOI · Paper page
  20. [28]Kim HK SpCas9 activity prediction by DeepSpCas9, a deep learning–based model with high generalization performance Sci. Adv. 2019 5 eaax9249 10.1126/sciadv.aax9249 31723604 PMC6834390 · DOI
  21. [31]Ba, J. L., Kiros, J. R. & Hinton, G. E. Layer normalization. Preprint at arXiv:1607.06450 (2016). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marquart, K. F., Allam, A., Janjuha, S., Sintsova, A., Villiger, L., Frey, N., Krauthammer, M., & Schwank, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
Corresponding author
  • Krauthammer, Michael
  • Schwank, Gerald
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2021-08-25
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
5114-5114
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3194369599
Cited by
102
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection (cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (185293, 310030)
  • Helmut Horten Stiftung
  • Functional Genomics Center Zurich
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
Keywords
base editing, attention-based deep learning, adenine base editors, cytosine base editors, editing efficiency, genome editing
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Deep Learning, Algorithms, Humans, Gene Library, Genome, Base Pairing, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review