Cited by 91Receptor Mechanisms and SignalingAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsEnzyme Structure and Function

Fusion protein strategies for cryo-EM study of G protein-coupled receptors

Open access
Zhang, Kaihua, Wu, Hao, Hoppe, Nicholas, Manglik, Aashish, Cheng, Yifan·2022·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Single particle cryogenic-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) is used extensively to determine structures of activated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in complex with G proteins or arrestins. However, applying it to GPCRs without signaling proteins remains challenging because most receptors lack structural features in their soluble domains to facilitate image alignment. In GPCR crystallography, inserting a fusion protein between transmembrane helices 5 and 6 is a highly successful strategy for crystallization. Although a similar strategy has the potential to broadly facilitate cryo-EM structure determination of GPCRs alone without signaling protein, the critical determinants that make this approach successful are not yet clear. Here, we address this shortcoming by exploring different fusion protein designs, which lead to structures of antagonist bound A 2A adenosine receptor at 3.4 Å resolution and unliganded Smoothened at 3.7 Å resolution. The fusion strategies explored here are likely applicable to cryo-EM interrogation of other GPCRs and small integral membrane proteins.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-022-32125-2

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, K., Wu, H., Hoppe, N., Manglik, A., & Cheng, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Manglik, Aashish
  • Cheng, Yifan
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2022-07-28
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
4366-4366
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4288077437
Cited by
91
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 3
FWCI
5.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Human Frontier Science Program
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
G protein-coupled receptors, fusion protein, single-particle cryo-EM, adenosine A2A receptor, Smoothened, unliganded receptor, integral membrane proteins, image registration
MeSH terms
Crystallography, Protein Structure, Secondary, GTP-Binding Proteins, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review