Cited by 28Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsEnzyme Structure and FunctionProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Automatic and accurate ligand structure determination guided by cryo-electron microscopy maps

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Advances in cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) and deep-learning guided protein structure prediction have expedited structural studies of protein complexes. However, methods for accurately determining ligand conformations are lacking. In this manuscript, we develop EMERALD, a tool for automatically determining ligand structures guided by medium-resolution cryoEM density. We show this method is robust at predicting ligands along with surrounding side chains in maps as low as 4.5 Å local resolution. Combining this with a measure of placement confidence and running on all protein/ligand structures in the EMDB, we show that 57% of ligands replicate the deposited model, 16% confidently find alternate conformations, 22% have ambiguous density where multiple conformations might be present, and 5% are incorrectly placed. For five cases where our approach finds an alternate conformation with high confidence, high-resolution crystal structures validate our placement. EMERALD and the resulting analysis should prove critical in using cryoEM to solve protein-ligand complexes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-023-36732-5

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Yip, K. M., Fischer, N., Paknia, E., Chari, A. & Holger, S. Atomic-resolution protein structure determination by cryo-EM. Nature 587, 157–161 (2020). · DOI
  2. Nakane, T. et al. Single-particle cryo-EM at atomic resolution. Nature 587, 152–156 (2020). · DOI
  3. Merk, A. et al. 1.8 Å resolution structure of β-galactosidase with a 200 kV CRYO ARM electron microscope. IUCrJ 7, 639–643 (2020). · DOI
  4. Wang, R. Y. R. et al. De novo protein structure determination from near-atomic-resolution cryo-EM maps. Nat. Methods 12, 335–338 (2015). · DOI
  5. Terwilliger, T. C., Adams, P. D., Afonine, P. V. & Sobolev, O. V. Cryo-EM map interpretation and protein model-building using iterative map segmentation. Protein Sci. 29, 87–99 (2020). · DOI
  6. Terashi, G. & Kihara, D. De novo main-chain modeling for EM maps using MAINMAST. Nat. Commun. 9, 1618 (2018). · DOI
  7. He, J. & Huang, S. Y. Full-length de novo protein structure determination from cryo-EM maps using deep learning. Bioinformatics 37, 3480–3490 (2021). · DOI
  8. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Cryst. D60, 2126–2132 (2004).
  9. Oldfield, T. J. X-LIGAND: an application for the automated addition of flexible ligands into electron density. Acta Cryst. D57, 696–705 (2001).
  10. Zwart, P. H., Langer, G. G. & Lamzin, V. S. Modelling bound ligands in protein crystal structures. Acta Cryst. D60, 2230–2239 (2004).
  11. Terwilliger, T. C., Klei, H., Adams, P. D., Moriarty, N. W. & Cohn, J. D. Automated ligand fitting by core-fragment fitting and extension into density. Acta Cryst. D62, 915–922 (2006).
  12. Evrard, G. X., Langer, G. G., Perrakis, A. & Lamzin, V. S. Assessment of automatic ligand building in ARP/wARP. Acta Cryst. D63, 108–117 (2007).
  13. Casañal, A., Lohkamp, B. & Emsley, P. Current developments in Coot for macromolecular model building of electron cryo-microscopy and crystallographic data. Protein Sci. 29, 1069–1078 (2020). · DOI
  14. Chojnowski, G., Sobolev, E., Heuser, P. & Lamzin, V. S. The accuracy of protein models automatically built into cryo-EM maps with ARP/wARP. Acta Cryst. D77, 142–150 (2021).
  15. van Zundert, G. C. P., Moriarty, N. W., Sobolev, O. V., Adams, P. D. & Borrelli, K. W. Macromolecular refinement of X-ray and cryoelectron microscopy structures with Phenix/OPLS3e for improved structure and ligand quality. Structure 29, 913–921 (2021). · DOI
  16. Robertson, M. J., van Zundert, G. C. P., Borrelli, K. & Skiniotis, G. GemSpot: a pipeline for robust modeling of ligands into cryo-EM maps. Structure 28, 707–716 (2020). · DOI
  17. Vant, J. W. et al. Flexible fitting of small-molecules into electron microscopy maps using molecular dynamics simulations with neural network potentials. J. Chem. Inf. Model 60, 2591–2604 (2020). · DOI
  18. Park, H., Zhou, G., Baek, M., Baker, D. & DiMaio, F. Force field optimization guided by small molecule crystal lattice data enables consistent sub-angstrom protein–ligand docking. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 2000–2010 (2021). · DOI
  19. Lawson, C. L. et al. EMDataBank unified data resource for 3DEM. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D396–D403 (2016). · DOI
  20. Yu, J. et al. Hippocampal AMPA receptor assemblies and mechanism of allosteric inhibition. Nature 594, 448–453 (2021). · DOI
  21. Sobolevsky, A. I., Rosconi, M. P. & Gouaux, E. X-ray structure of AMPA-subtype glutamate receptor: symmetry and mechanism. Nature 462, 745–756 (2009). · DOI
  22. Zhang, D., Watson, J. F., Matthews, P. M., Cais, O. & Greger, I. H. Gating and modulation of a hetero-octameric AMPA glutamate receptor. Nature 594, 454–458 (2021). · DOI
  23. Garvie, C. W. et al. Structure of PDE3A-SLFN12 complex reveals requirements for activation of SLFN12 RNase. Nat. Commun. 12, 4375 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  24. Yin, Y. et al. Structural basis for aggregate dissolution and refolding by the Mycobacterium tuberculosis ClpB-DnaK bi-chaperone system. Cell Rep. 35, 109166 (2021). · DOI
  25. Krintel, C. et al. Thermodynamics and structural analysis of positive allosteric modulation of the ionotropic glutamate receptor GluA2. Biochem. J. 441, 173–178 (2012). · DOI
  26. Park, Y. J. et al. Structures of MERS-CoV spike glycoprotein in complex with sialoside attachment receptors. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26, 1151–1157 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  27. Sauer, M. M. et al. Structural basis for broad coronavirus neutralization. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 28, 478–486 (2021). · DOI
  28. Lyu, M. et al. Cryo-EM structures of a gonococcal multidrug efflux pump illuminate a mechanism of drug recognition and resistance. mBio 11, e00996–20 (2020). · DOI
  29. Yin, Y. et al. Structural basis of cooling agent and lipid sensing by the cold-activated TRPM8 channel. Science 363, eaav9334 (2019). · DOI
  30. Nakanishi, H. et al. Transport cycle of plasma membrane flippase ATP11C by cryo-EM. Cell Rep. 32, 108208 (2020). · DOI
  31. Ozorowski, G., Torres, J. L., Santos-Martins, D., Forli, S. & Ward, A. B. A strain-specific inhibitor of receptor-bound HIV-1 targets a pocket near the fusion peptide. Cell Rep. 33, 108428 (2020). · DOI
  32. Wang, L., Wu, D., Robinson, C. V., Wu, H. & Fu, T. M. Structures of a complete human V-ATPase reveal mechanisms of its assembly. Mol. Cell 80, 501–511 (2020). · DOI
  33. Xiao, P. et al. Ligand recognition and allosteric regulation of DRD1-Gs signaling complexes. Cell 184, 943–956 (2021). · DOI
  34. Hao, J. et al. Synthesis and pharmacological characterization of 2-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)-1-((1S,3R)-5-(3-hydroxy-3-methylbutyl)-3-(hydroxymethyl)-1-methyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2(1H)-yl)ethan-1-one (LY3154207), a potent, subtype selective, and orally available positive allosteric modulator of the human dopamine D1 receptor. J. Med. Chem. 62, 8711–8732 (2019). · DOI
  35. Li, J. et al. Cryo-EM structures of Escherichia coli cytochrome bo3 reveal bound phospholipids and ubiquinone-8 in a dynamic substrate binding site. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2106750118 (2021). · DOI
  36. Toelzer, C. et al. Free fatty acid binding pocket in the locked structure of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Science 370, 725–730 (2020). · DOI
  37. Frenz, B., Walls, A., Egelman, E., Veesler, D. & DiMaio, F. RosettaES: a sampling strategy enabling automated interpretation of difficult cryo-EM maps. Nat. Methods 14, 797–800 (2017). · DOI
  38. Frenz, B. et al. Automatically fixing errors in glycoprotein structures with Rosetta. Structure 27, 134–139 (2019). · DOI
  39. Moriarty, N. W., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W. & Adams, P. D. electronic Ligand Builder and Optimization Workbench (eLBOW): a tool for ligand coordinate and restraint generation. Acta Cryst. D65, 1074–1080 (2009).
  40. O’Boyle, N. M. et al. Open Babel: an open chemical toolbox. J. Cheminform. 3, 33 (2011). · DOI
  41. Ropp, P. J., Kaminsky, J. C., Yablonski, S. & Durrant, J. D. Dimorphite-DL: an open-source program for enumerating the ionization states of drug-like small molecules. J. Cheminform. 11, 14 (2019). · DOI
  42. Wang, J., Wang, W., Kollman, P. A. & Case, D. A. Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 25, 247260 (2006). · DOI
  43. Jakalian, A., Bush, B. L., Jack, B. D. & Bayly, C. I. Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC Model: I. Method. J. Comp. Chem. 21, 132–146 (2000). · DOI
  44. Greer, J. Three-dimensional pattern recognition: an approach to automated interpretation of electron density maps of proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 82, 279–301 (1974). · DOI
  45. Vilas, J. L. et al. MonoRes: automatic and accurate estimation of local resolution for electron microscopy maps. Structure 26, 337–344 (2018). · DOI
  46. Meng, E. C., Pettersen, E. F., Couch, G. S., Huang, C. C. & Ferrin, T. E. Tools for integrated sequence-structure analysis with UCSF Chimera. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 339 (2006). · DOI
  47. Terwilliger, T. C., Sobolev, O. V., Afonine, P. V. & Adams, P. D. Automated map sharpening by maximization of detail and connectivity. Acta Cryst. D74, 545–559 (2018).
  48. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004). · DOI
  49. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis (Springer-Verlag New York, 2016). https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Muenks, A., Zepeda, S., Zhou, G., Veesler, D., & DiMaio, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
DiMaio, Frank
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2023-03-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
1164-1164
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4322733414
Cited by
28
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (T32GM008268, 1762114)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1156262)
  • University of Washington (1762114)
  • Fast Grants
  • Defense Threat Reduction Agency (GRANT13030960)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (DGE-1762114, T32GM008268, R01GM123089)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (DP1AI158186, 75N93022C00036, DP1AI158186 and 75N93022C00036, F31AI174573, OPP1156262)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
cryo-electron microscopy maps, protein-ligand complex, emerald, protein structure prediction
MeSH terms
Ligands, Mental Processes, Running, Cryoelectron Microscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review